Abstract
Background: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a major subtype of esophageal cancers. The five-year survival rate of ESCC is low, and molecular targets for ESCC treatment and prognosis assessment are very limited. T cells are critical for the clearance of cancer cells, and blockade of co-inhibitory molecules for T cell activation has emerged as a promising therapy to treat cancer patients. However, in ESCC patients, co-inhibitory molecules regulating T cell activation are poorly documented.
Objective: We aim to evaluate how the presence of inhibitory check-point molecules in T cells could impact the survival of patients.
Methods: We performed a follow-up study of 161 patients undergoing resection of esophageal carcinoma from February 2014 to December 2015, by immunohistochemical staining of six co-inhibitory molecules for T cell activation, namely PD-1, CTLA-4, TIM-3, LAG-3, BTLA and A2AR. Expression of each of the six co-inhibitory molecules was analyzed for its correlation with patient survival by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. We also applied Kaplan-Meier analyses to evaluate the concomitant expression of co-inhibitory molecules and their correlation with patient survival.
Results: We found that levels of PD-1, TIM-3 and BTLA can be used as independent prognostic factors for the overall survival of patients with ESCC. More importantly, our study found that the co-expression of PD-1 and TIM-3, PD-1 and BTLA, TIM-3 and BTLA significantly reduced the survival of patients with ESCC (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Therefore, our results suggest the necessity of evaluating the tumor tissue expression of co-inhibitory molecules and targeting co-expressed molecules in immunotherapies for ESCC patients.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt486] [PMID: 24356640]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/acs.2017.03.03] [PMID: 28447001]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2017.155] [PMID: 28585555]
[PMID: 26889482]
[PMID: 31683393]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2016.0093] [PMID: 28443201]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.11.004] [PMID: 28007352]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2016.12.009] [PMID: 28096057]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v6.i5.112] [PMID: 24834141]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2507] [PMID: 29930885]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgh.14289] [PMID: 29802647]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21565] [PMID: 31184787]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/1547691X.2012.678021] [PMID: 22524673]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.08.002] [PMID: 24029602]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1606774] [PMID: 27718847]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2015.139] [PMID: 26260659]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm0798-844] [PMID: 9662379]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcb.26645] [PMID: 29274296]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature22395] [PMID: 28541315]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00561] [PMID: 28878676]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921445117] [PMID: 32161124]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3271] [PMID: 24714771]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.58] [PMID: 27141885]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11864-013-0268-y] [PMID: 24504486]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-018-0316-z] [PMID: 29357948]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.21873/invivo.12082] [PMID: 32871794]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4903-7] [PMID: 26464193]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aak9670] [PMID: 28404865]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.17922] [PMID: 28591697]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aak9679] [PMID: 28404866]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1852] [PMID: 21159637]