Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Research Article

The Radiological Evaluation of Posterior Superior Alveolar Artery by Using CBCT

Author(s): Hazal Karslioglu, Mesude Çitir*, Kaan Gunduz and Pelin Kasap

Volume 17, Issue 3, 2021

Published on: 28 June, 2020

Page: [384 - 389] Pages: 6

DOI: 10.2174/1573405616666200628134308

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Evaluation of the maxillary sinus anatomy prior to sinus lift procedures is important to avoid surgical complications due to the close anatomical relationship between the posterior maxillary region and the maxillary sinüs.

Introduction: In order to avoid traumatizing the posterior superior alveolar artery and to prevent perioperative bleeding, locating the exact position of the artery is imperative before the surgical procedures.

Methods: 150 CBCT scans were evaluated. The distance from the inferior border of the PSAA to the alveolar crest (the vertical line from the artery to the crest) and floor of the maxillary sinus, the distance from PSAA to medial sinus wall, nasal septum, zygomatic arch, position, the distance from the floor of maxillary sinüs to the alveolar crest and diameter of the PSAA were assessed. Locations of the artery were classified.

Results: The artery diameters were mostly ≥ 1 mm. The artery was mostly intraosseous (59.7%), 21.7% was superficial and only 18.7% was intra-sinuscular.

Conclusion: The location of PSAA is intraosseous in most patients. The artery diameters were mostly ≥ 1 mm and we can say that increasing the size also increases the risk of complications.

Keywords: Cone beam computed tomography, maxillary sinus, maxillofacial radiologist, nasal septum, superior alveolar artery, third molar permanent teeth.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Jensen OT, Shulman LB, Block MS, Iacono VJ. Report of the sinus consensus conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13(Suppl.): 11-45.
[2]
Tong DC, Rioux K, Drangsholt M, Beirne OR. A review of survival rates for implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses using meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13(2): 175-82.
[3]
Rahpeyma A, Khajehahmadi S. Alveolar antral artery: Review of surgical techniques involving this anatomic structure. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 26(75): 73-8.
[4]
Park W, Choi S, Kim S. Study on the position of the posterior superior alveolar artery in relation to the performance of the maxillary sinus bone graft procedure in a Korean population. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 38: 71-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2012.38.2.71]
[5]
Ilgüy D, Ilgüy M, Dolekoglu S, Fisekcioglu E. Evaluation of the posterior superior alveolar artery and the maxillary sinus with CBCT. Braz Oral Res 2013; 27(5): 431-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242013000500007]
[6]
Santos German IJ, Buchaim DV, Andreo JC, et al. Identification of the bony canal of the posterior superior alveolar nerve and artery in the maxillary sinus: tomographic, radiographic, and macroscopic analyses. ScientificWorldJourna l 2015; 2015: 878205.
[7]
Bailoor D, Handa H, Raghuvanshi V, Shrivstava K. Evaluation of relationship of root to sinus in maxillary sinusitis patients – a comparative assessment of conventional radiographs and CBCT. J Adv Med Dent Sci 2014; 2(2): 197-204.
[8]
Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998; 8(9): 1558-64.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s003300050586]
[9]
Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, et al. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol 2009; 71(3): 461-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.002]
[10]
Dobele I, Kise L, Apse P, Kragis G, Bigestans A. Radiographic assessment of findings in the maxillary sinus using cone-beam computed tomography. Stomatologija 2013; 15(4): 119-22.
[11]
Okano T, Harata Y, Sugihara Y, et al. Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38(2): 79-85.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/14769929]
[12]
Mardinger O, Abba M, Hirshberg A, Schwartz-Arad D. Prevalence, diameter and course of the maxillary intraosseous vascular canal with relation to sinus augmentation procedure: a radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 36(8): 735-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2007.05.005]
[13]
Khojastehpour L, Dehbozorgi M, Tabrizi R, Esfandnia S. Evaluating the anatomical location of the posterior superior alveolar artery in cone beam computed tomography images. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 45(3): 354-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.09.018]
[14]
Güncü GN, Yildirim YD, Wang HL, Tözüm TF. Location of posterior superior alveolar artery and evaluation of maxillary sinus anatomy with computerized tomography: a clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22(10): 1164-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02071.x]
[15]
Kim JH, Ryu JS, Kim KD, Hwang SH, Moon HS. A radiographic study of the posterior superior alveolar artery. Implant Dent 2011; 20(4): 306-10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e31822634bd]
[16]
Ding WG, Yan WH, Wei ZX, Liu JB. Difference in intraosseous blood vessel volume and number in osteoporotic model mice induced by spinal cord injury and sciatic nerve resection. J Bone Miner Metab 2012; 30(4): 400-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00774-011-0328-y]
[17]
Tehranchi M, Taleghani F, Shahab S, Nouri A. Prevalence and location of the posterior superior alveolar artery using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent 2017; 47(1): 39-44.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2017.47.1.39]
[18]
Shahidi S, Zamiri B, Momeni Danaei S, Salehi S, Hamedani S. Evaluation of anatomic variations in maxillary sinus with the aid of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in a population in South of Iran. J Dent (Shiraz) 2016; 17(1): 7-15.
[19]
Pandharbale AA, Gadgil RM, Bhoosreddy AR, et al. Evaluation of the posterior superior alveolar artery using cone beam computed tomography. Pol J Radiol 2016; 81: 606-10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.899221]
[20]
Solar P, Geyerhofer U, Traxler H, Windisch A, Ulm C, Watzek G. Blood supply to the maxillary sinus relevant to sinus floor elevation procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10(1): 34-44.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100105.x]
[21]
Traxler H, Windisch A, Geyerhofer U, Surd R, Solar P, Firbas W. Arterial blood supply of the maxillary sinus. Clin Anat 1999; 12(6): 417-21.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1999)12:6<417:AID-CA3>3.0.CO;2-W]
[22]
Elian N, Wallace S, Cho SC, Jalbout ZN, Froum S. Distribution of the maxillary artery as it relates to sinus floor augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20(5): 784-7.
[23]
Velasco-Torres M, Padial-Molina M, Alarcón JA. OʼValle F, Catena A, Galindo-Moreno P. Maxillary sinus dimensions With respect to the posterior superior alveolar artery decrease with tooth loss. Implant Dent 2016; 25(4): 464-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000445]
[24]
Avila G, Wang HL, Galindo-Moreno P, et al. The influence of the bucco-palatal distance on sinus augmentation outcomes. J Periodontol 2010; 81(7): 1041-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.090686]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy