Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) is biologically and genetically heterogeneous with complex carcinogenesis at the molecular level. Despite the application of multiple approaches in the GC treatment, its 5-year survival is poor. A major limitation of anti-cancer drugs application is intrinsic or acquired resistance, especially to chemotherapeutical agents. It is known that the effectiveness of chemotherapy remains debatable and varies according to the molecular type of GC. Chemotherapy has an established role in the management of GC. Perioperative chemotherapy or postoperative chemotherapy is applied for localized ones. Most of the advanced GC patients have a poor response to treatment and unfavorable outcomes with standard therapies.
Resistance substantially limits the depth and duration of clinical responses to targeted anticancer therapies. Through the use of complementary experimental approaches, investigators have revealed that cancer cells can achieve resistance through adaptation or selection driven by specific genetic, epigenetic, or microenvironmental alterations. Ultimately, these diverse alterations often lead to the activation of MAPK, AKT/mTOR, and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways that, when co-opted, enable cancer cells to survive drug treatments. We have summarized the mechanisms of resistance development to cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and multidrug resistance in the GC management. The complexity of molecular targets and components of signaling cascades altered in the resistance development results in the absence of significant benefits in GC treatment, and its efficacy remains low. The universal process responsible for the failure in the multimodal approach in GC treatment is autophagy. Its dual role in oncogenesis is the most unexplored issue. We have discussed the possible mechanism of autophagy regulation upon the action of endogenous factors and drugs. The experimental data obtained in the cultured GC cells need further verification. To overcome the cancer resistance and to prevent autophagy as the main reason of ineffective treatment, it is suggested the concept of the direct influence of autophagy molecular markers followed by the standard chemotherapy. Dozen of studies have focused on finding the rationale for the benefits of such complex therapy. The perspectives in the molecular-based management of GC are associated with the development of molecular markers predicting the protective autophagy initiation and search for novel targets of effective anticancer therapy.
Keywords: Molecular diagnosis and therapeutics, chemotherapy, tumor markers, autophagy, anticancer therapy, gastric cancer (GC).
Graphical Abstract
[PMID: 27775797]
[PMID: 23564763]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wo.2014.47136] [PMID: 25691825]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tgh.2019.05.02] [PMID: 31231709]
[PMID: 28255193]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i26.2818] [PMID: 30018477]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5582/bst.2016.01078] [PMID: 27251446]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12943-019-0944-z] [PMID: 30678689]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2018.01.09] [PMID: 29357975]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/aps.2013.131] [PMID: 24317012]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03009734.2012.659294] [PMID: 22376239]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7868/S0026898417020197] [PMID: 28537244]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/thy.2010.1646] [PMID: 20578891]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10555-010-9208-5] [PMID: 20111893]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13475] [PMID: 27888811]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123950] [PMID: 30544835]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules21070965] [PMID: 27455225]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/13816128112092464] [PMID: 22372504]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2015.08.009] [PMID: 26349984]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1248] [PMID: 26392071]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14728222.2017.1389900] [PMID: 28994330]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.09.040] [PMID: 27622325]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2018.4593] [PMID: 30320370]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2017.04.111] [PMID: 28578256]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.12356] [PMID: 27708226]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-2361] [PMID: 27013200]
[PMID: 29028095]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/or.2015.3898] [PMID: 25846650]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2016.11.139] [PMID: 28012924]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13046-017-0528-y] [PMID: 28407783]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2015.11.013] [PMID: 26589846]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.9.5231] [PMID: 24175806]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2016.3371] [PMID: 26847910]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-012-2381-3] [PMID: 23010741]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.903134] [PMID: 28759561]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-015-3668-8] [PMID: 26136123]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2017.04.008] [PMID: 28847472]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mc.22793] [PMID: 29436749]
[PMID: 23852891]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2013.2211] [PMID: 24337061]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2017.1278786] [PMID: 28110575]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2018.8661] [PMID: 29512733]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep20502] [PMID: 26846307]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2018.8664] [PMID: 29512712]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2016.05.004] [PMID: 27269920]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-015-4392-0] [PMID: 26563373]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2009.12.004] [PMID: 20056399]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2015.00022] [PMID: 25741318]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2019.03.010] [PMID: 30940605]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2007.08.014] [PMID: 17928127]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18091865] [PMID: 28846632]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.80] [PMID: 19322194]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162977] [PMID: 27627761]
[PMID: 26171139]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2018.11.028] [PMID: 30472237]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00005] [PMID: 29403459]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.7508] [PMID: 26910278]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.5674] [PMID: 26497999]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41419-019-1314-x] [PMID: 30760701]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2017.07.003] [PMID: 28728293]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcp.26190] [PMID: 28926094]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.01.013] [PMID: 28254439]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12943-017-0743-3] [PMID: 29162158]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2017.09.035] [PMID: 28965855]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1169] [PMID: 28857517]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000488742] [PMID: 29635244]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/CBM-160613] [PMID: 27314289]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins10100398] [PMID: 30274213]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ERC-18-0502]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.6101] [PMID: 28693184]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/102735] [PMID: 23840208]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.10.034] [PMID: 28029600]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphs.2016.03.001] [PMID: 27032906]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2017.02.008] [PMID: 28478808]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2017.7716] [PMID: 28990095]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2017.4134] [PMID: 29048624]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.09.031] [PMID: 28947133]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-015-2104-y] [PMID: 26658914]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.037] [PMID: 21962518]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2014.2313] [PMID: 24585095]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18091959] [PMID: 28895911]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2014.05.004] [PMID: 24879905]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.12] [PMID: 21326174]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BSR20140141] [PMID: 26182361]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mc.22777] [PMID: 29278657]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70436-4] [PMID: 24176572]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i8.2403] [PMID: 26937129]