Abstract
Background: The inhibitory GABAergic system has shown an association with multiple psychiatric disorders. The type A GABA receptors are an integral component of this system, and in recent years, evidence has accumulated to support an essential role in disease etiology for one of the receptor genes GABRB2 which encodes for the receptor β2 subunit.
Objective: To summarize the different lines of evidence supporting the important role of GABRB2 in psychiatric disorders, with a particular focus on schizophrenia, and evaluate the recently-proposed GABRB2-origin of schizophrenia hypothesis.
Results: In terms of genetics, Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in GABRB2 have been associated with a number of psychiatric disorders, and some of the associations have remained significant following meta-analysis. Importantly, expression and alternative splicing of the gene was shown to be dependent on the genotypes of the associated SNPs, and receptors containing the long isoform displayed functional differences compared to those containing the short isoform. Moreover, differential epigenetic regulation and imprinting imbalance of the gene were observed in schizophrenic patients compared to healthy subjects. Finally, recent findings from a Gabrb2-knockout mouse model demonstrated that knockout of the gene alone was sufficient to induce a wide range of schizophrenia- like symptoms and comorbid phenotypes.
Conclusion: The different lines of evidence coalesce to strongly support the recentlyproposed GABRB2-origin of schizophrenia hypothesis, and GABRB2 may also have a potential role in cognition, the dysfunction of which is common to many psychiatric disorders.
Keywords: Alternative splicing, epigenetic regulation, Gabrb2-knockout mouse, GABRB2, psychiatric disorders, single nucleotide polymorphisms.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073858411422114] [PMID: 21952258]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40263-015-0252-0] [PMID: 26104862]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.57] [PMID: 27256556]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1214395] [PMID: 19434561]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-5949.2010.00223.x] [PMID: 21199447]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0435] [PMID: 23440468]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18081689] [PMID: 28771182]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.12.006] [PMID: 28063469]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.02.002.2008] [PMID: 18946535]
[PMID: 4663826]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963721410377601] [PMID: 25414548]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2015.07.017] [PMID: 26255083]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.jcp.0000095349.32154.a5] [PMID: 14624191]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.2447] [PMID: 19915563]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.03.010] [PMID: 25863358]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10897-005-1622-4] [PMID: 16195940]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2010.05.004] [PMID: 20579747]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011351] [PMID: 20613869]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18081813] [PMID: 28825683]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12264-014-1478-4] [PMID: 25370443]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-011613-135947] [PMID: 24160694]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1615/CritRevNeurobiol.v14.i1.20] [PMID: 11253954]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npp.2014.95] [PMID: 24759129]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12534] [PMID: 24628861]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10409230601146219] [PMID: 17364682]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.07.045] [PMID: 18760291]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msl188] [PMID: 17135332]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.mp.4001461] [PMID: 14699426]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.06.167] [PMID: 16023997]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000462] [PMID: 17520021]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2006.01.009] [PMID: 16472798]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2007.02.023] [PMID: 17412563]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.05.002] [PMID: 15993854]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/YPG.0b013e32801118cd] [PMID: 17167345]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.171] [PMID: 18583979]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2008.06.016] [PMID: 18715757]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.mp.4001899] [PMID: 16983389]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006977] [PMID: 19763268]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009547] [PMID: 20221451]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/mp.2010.47] [PMID: 20404824]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/345463] [PMID: 12474144]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.30374] [PMID: 16958029]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00050.x] [PMID: 18783362]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gbb.12315] [PMID: 27509263]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BST0371415] [PMID: 19909288]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2012.01.013] [PMID: 22357337]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142049] [PMID: 26561861]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.1.47] [PMID: 15630072]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062322] [PMID: 23638040]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/mol.115.097998] [PMID: 25904555]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01386.x] [PMID: 21449915]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00008877-200006000-00011] [PMID: 11103882]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-13-05572.2002] [PMID: 12097508]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2004.01.008] [PMID: 15265649]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.01.022] [PMID: 21277876]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950240016004] [PMID: 7492260]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-018-0176-9] [PMID: 30013074]