Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1386-2073
ISSN (Online): 1875-5402

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Meta-Analysis

Efficacy and Safety of Robot-assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS) Compare with Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) for Lung Lobectomy in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Author(s): Xun Hu and Ming Wang*

Volume 22, Issue 3, 2019

Page: [169 - 178] Pages: 10

DOI: 10.2174/1386207322666190411113040

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: In the past decade, many researchers focused on Robotic- Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (RATS), which has been introduced as an alternative minimally invasive approach, versus Video- Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) for lung lobectomy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. However, the advantage of RVATS compared to VATS is still under investigation. The results are unclear.

Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Robot-assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS) lobectomy versus Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) for lobectomy in patients with Non- Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: A systematic electronic search of online electronic databases: Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane library updated in June 2017. The meta-analysis was performed including the studies are designed as randomized or non- randomized controlled.

Results: Twenty retrospective cohort studies met our inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis of mortality showed that RATS lobectomy significantly reduced the mortality rate when compared with VATS lobectomy (RR =0.53, 95% CI 0.37 – 0.76; P = 0.0005). With the pooled result of duration of surgery indicated that RATS has a tendency towards longer surgery time (SMD= 0.52, 95% CI 0.23– 0.81; P < 0.0004=). However, the meta-analysis on the median length of hospital stay (MD =0.00, 95% CI -0.03 – 0.03; P = 0.91), number of dissected lymph nodes station (SMD =0.39, 95% CI -0.60 – 1.38; P = 0.44), the number of removed lymph nodes (SMD =0.98, 95% CI -0.61 – 2.56; P = 0.23), mean duration of drainage (SMD =0.29, 95% CI -0.15 – 0.73; P = 0.20), prolonged air leak (RR =1.01, 95% CI 0.84 – 1.21; P = 0.93), arrhythmia (RR =1.06, 95% CI 0.88 – 1.26; P = 0.54) (P= 0.54), pneumonia (RR =0.89, 95% CI 0.69 – 1.13; P = 0.33), the incidence of conversion (RR =0.82, 95% CI 0.54 – 1.26; P = 0.37) and morbidity (RR =1.05, 95% CI 0.90 – 1.23; P = 0.055) all showed no significant differences between RATS and VATS lobectomy.

Conclusions: RATS result in better mortality as compared with VATS. However, robotics seems to have longer operative time and higher hospital costs, without superior advantages in morbidity rates and oncologic efficiency. Since the advantages of RATS has been performed in some area, the continuation of a comparative investigation with VATS may be necessary. And some efforts need to be taken into consideration to reduce the operative time and cost.

Keywords: Robot-assisted thoracic surgery, video-assisted thoracic surgery, minimally invasive surgery, lung lobectomy, meta-anlysis, lung cancer.

« Previous Next »
[1]
Detterbeck, F.C.; Lewis, S.Z.; Diekemper, R.; Addrizzo-Harris, D.; Alberts, W.M. Executive summary: diagnosis and management of lung cancer 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest., 2013, 143, 7S-37S.
[2]
Berry, M.F.; D’Amico, T.A.; Onaitis, M.W.; Kelsey, C.R. Thoracoscopic approach to lobectomy for lung cancer does not compromise oncologic efficacy. Ann. Thorac. Surg., 2014, 98, 197-202.
[3]
Petersen, R.H.; Hansen, H.J. Learning curve associated with VATS lobectomy. Ann. Cardiothorac. Surg., 2012, 1, 47-50.
[4]
Arad, T.; Levi-Faber, D.; Nir, R.R.; Kremer, R. The learning curve of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung lobectomy—a single Israeli center experience. Harefuah, 2012, 151(5), 261-265, 320.
[5]
Park, B.J.; Flores, R.M.; Rusch, V.W. Robotic assistance for video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy: Technique and initial results. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 2006, 131, 54-59.
[6]
Gharagozloo, F.; Margolis, M.; Tempesta, B.; Strother, E.; Najam, F. Robot-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer: Report of 100 consecutive cases. Ann. Thorac. Surg., 2009, 88, 380-384.
[7]
Augustin, F.; Bodner, J.; Wykypiel, H.; Schwinghammer, C.; Schmid, T. Initial experience with robotic lung lobectomy: Report of two different approaches. Surg. Endosc., 2011, 25, 108-113.
[8]
Kumar, A.; Asaf, B.B.; Cerfolio, R.J.; Sood, J.; Kumar, R. Robotic lobectomy: The first Indian report. J. Minim. Access Surg., 2015, 11, 94-98.
[9]
Farivar, A.S.; Cerfolio, R.J.; Vallieres, E.; Knight, A.W.; Bryant, A.; Lingala, V.; Aye, R.W.; Louie, B.E. Comparing robotic lung resection with thoracotomy and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases entered into the society of thoracic surgeons database. Innovations (Phila.), 2014, 9, 10-15.
[10]
Moore, L.J.; Wilson, M.R.; Waine, E.; Masters, R.S.; McGrath, J.S.; Vine, S.J. Robotic technology results in faster and more robust surgical skill acquisition than traditional laparoscopy. J. Robot. Surg., 2015, 9, 67-73.
[11]
Buentzel, J.; Heinz, J.; Hinterthaner, M.; Schöndube, F.A.; Straube, C.; Roever, C.; Emmert, A. Robotic versus thoracoscopic thymectomy: The current evidence. Int. J. Med. Robot., 2017, 13(4)
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1847]
[12]
Higgins, J.P.; Thompson, S.G. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat. Med., 2002, 21, 1539-1558.
[13]
Higgins, J.P.; Thompson, S.G.; Deeks, J.J.; Altman, D.G. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 2003, 327(7414), 557-560.
[14]
Jang, H.J.; Lee, H.S.; Park, S.Y.; Zo, J.I. Comparison of the early robot-assisted lobectomy experience to video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for lung cancer: a single-institution case series matching study. Innovations (Phila.), 2011, 6(5), 305-310.
[15]
Lee, H.S.; Jang, H.J. Thoracoscopic mediastinal lymph node dissection for lung cancer. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 2012, 24, 131-141.
[16]
Augustin, F.; Bodner, J.; Maier, H.; Schwinghammer, C.; Pichler, B.; Lucciarini, P.; Pratschke, J.; Schmid, T. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive vs. thoracoscopic lung lobectomy: Comparison of perioperative results in a learning curve setting. Langenbecks Arch. Surg., 2013, 398(6), 895-901.
[17]
Adams, R.D.; Bolton, W.D.; Stephenson, J.E.; Henry, G.; Robbins, E.T.; Sommers, E. Initial multicenter community robotic lobectomy experience: Comparisons to a national database. Ann. Thorac. Surg., 2014, 97(6), 1893-1898. discussion 1899-900.
[18]
He, Y.; Coonar, A.; Gelvez-Zapata, S.; Sastry, P.; Page, A. Evaluation of a robot-assisted video- assisted thoracoscopic surgery programme. Exp. Ther. Med., 2014, 7, 873-876.
[19]
Kent, M.; Wang, T.; Whyte, R.; Curran, T.; Flores, R.; Gangadharan, S. Open, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic lobectomy: Review of a national database. Ann. Thorac. Surg., 2014, 97, 236-242. discussion 242-244.
[20]
Paul, S.; Jalbert, J.; Isaacs, A.J.; Altorki, N. K3.; Isom, O.W.; Sedrakyan, A. Comparative effectiveness of robotic- assisted vs thoracoscopic lobectomy. Chest, 2014, 146, 1505-1512.
[21]
Swanson, S.J.; Miller, D.L.; McKenna Jr, R.J.; Howington, J.; Marshall, M.B.; Yoo, A.C.; Moore, M.; Gunnarsson, C.L.; Meyers, B.F. Comparing robot-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy with conventional video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy and wedge resection: Results from a multihospital database (Premier). J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 2014, 147, 929-937.
[22]
Lee, B.E.; Shapiro, M.; Rutledge, J.R.; Korst, R.J. Nodal upstaging in robotic and video assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for clinical N0 lung cancer. Ann. Thorac. Surg., 2015, 100, 229-233. discussion 233-234.
[23]
Mahieu, J.; Rinieri, P.; Bubenheim, M.; Calenda, E.; Melki, J.; Peillon, C.; Baste, J.M. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung lobectomy: Can a robotic approach improve short-term outcomes and operative safety? Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 2016, 4, 354-362.
[24]
Yang, H.X.; Woo, K.M.; Sima, C.S.; Bains, M.S.; Adusumilli, P.S.; Huang, J.; Finley, D.J.; Rizk, N.P.; Rusch, V.W.; Jones, D.R.; Park, B.J. Long-term survival based on the surgical approach to lobectomy for clinical stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer: comparison of robotic, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and thoracotomy lobectomy. Ann. Surg., 2017, 265, 431-437.
[25]
Louie, B.E.; Wilson, J.L.; Kim, S.; Cerfolio, R.J.; Park, B.J.; Farivar, A.S.; Vallières, E.; Aye, R.W.; Burfeind, W.R., Jr; Block, M.I. Comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and robotic approaches for clinical stage I and stage II non-small cell lung cancer using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database. Ann. Thorac. Surg., 2016, 102, 917-924.
[26]
Mungo, B.; Hooker, C.M.; Ho, J.S.; Yang, S.C.; Battafarano, R.J.; Brock, M.V.; Molena, D. Robotic versus thoracoscopic resection for lung cancer: Early results of a new robotic program. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A, 2016, 26(4), 243-248.
[27]
Demir, A.; Ayalp, K.; Ozkan, B.; Kaba, E.; Toker, A. Robotic and video-assisted thoracic surgery lung segmentectomy for malignant and benign lesion. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg., 2015, 20(3), 304-309.
[28]
Bao, F.; Zhang, C.; Yang, Y.; He, Z.; Wang, L.; Hu, J. Comparison of robotic and video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer: A propensity-matched analysis. J. Thorac. Dis., 2016, 8(7), 1798-1803.
[29]
Deen, S.A.; Wilson, J.L.; Wilshire, C.L.; Vallières, E.; Farivar, A.S.; Aye, R.W.; Ely, R.E.; Louie, B.E. Defining the cost of care for lobectomy and segmentectomy: A comparison of open, video-assisted thoracoscopic, and robotic approaches. Ann. Thorac. Surg., 2014, 97(3), 1000-1007.
[30]
Lee, B.E.; Korst, R.J.; Kletsman, E.; Rutledge, J.R. Transitioning from video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy to robotics for lung cancer: are there outcomes advantages? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 2014, 147(2), 724-729.
[31]
Bodner, J.; Schmid, T.; Augustin, F. Minimally invasive approaches for lung lobectomy - From VATS to robotic and back. Eur. Surg., 2011, 43(4), 224-228.
[32]
Deen, S.A.; Wilson, J.L.; Wilshire, C.L.; Vallières, E.; Farivar, A.S.; Aye, R.W.; Ely, R.E.; Louie, B.E. Defining the cost of care for lobectomy and segmentectomy: A comparison open, video-assisteg thoracoscopic, and robotic approaches. Ann. Thorac. Surg., 2014, 97(3), 1000-1007.
[33]
Kirby, T.J.; Mack, M.J.; Landreneau, R.J.; Rice, T.W. Initial experience with video - assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Ann. Thorac. Surg., 1993, 56, 1248-1252. discussion 52-53.
[34]
Walker, W.S.; Carnochan, F.M.; Pugh, G.C. Thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy. Early operative experience and preliminary clinical results. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 1993, 106, 1111-1117.
[35]
Keenan, R.J.; Landreneau, R.J.; Maley, R.H., Jr; Singh, D.; Macherey, R.; Bartley, S.; Santucci, T. Segmental resection spares pulmonary function in patients with stage 1 lung cancer. Ann. Thorac. Surg., 2004, 78, 228-233.
[36]
Koike, T.; Yamato, Y.; Yoshiya, K.; Shimoyama, T.; Suzuki, R. Intentional limited pulmonary resection for peripheral T1 N0 M0 small-sized lung cancer. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 2003, 125, 924-928.
[37]
Wolf, A.S.; Richards, W.G.; Jaklitsch, M.T.; Gill, R.; Chirieac, L.R.; Colson, Y.L.; Mohiuddin, K.; Mentzer, S.J.; Bueno, R.; Sugarbaker, D.J.; Swanson, S.J. Lobectomy versus sublobar resection for small (2 cm or less) non-small cell lung cancers. Ann. Thorac. Surg., 2011, 95, 1819-1823.
[38]
Yan, T.D.; Black, D.; Bannon, P.G.; McCaughan, B.C. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol., 2009, 27, 2553-2562.
[39]
Kirby, T.J.; Mack, M.J.; Landreneau, R.J.; Rice, T.W. Lobectomy—video-assisted thoracic surgery versus muscle-sparing thoracotomy. A randomized trial. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 1995, 109, 997-1001. discussion 1001-1002.
[40]
McKenna, R.J., Jr; Houck, W.; Fuller, C.B. Video-assisted tho- racic surgery lobectomy: Experience with 1,100 cases. Ann. Thorac. Surg., 2006, 81, 421-425. discussion 425-426.
[41]
Veronesi, G.; Galetta, D.; Maisonneuve, P.; Melfi, F.; Schmid, R.A.; Borri, A.; Vannucci, F.; Spaggiari, L. Four-arm robotic lobectomy for the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 2010, 140, 19-25.
[42]
Pardolesi, A.; Park, B.; Petrella, F.; Borri, A.; Gasparri, R.; Veronesi, G. Robotic anatomic segmentectomy of the lung: Technical aspects and initial results. Ann. Thorac. Surg., 2012, 94, 929-934.
[43]
Cerfolio, R.J.; Bryant, A.S.; Skylizard, L.; Minnich, D.J. Initial consecutive experience of completely portal robotic pulmonary resection with 4 arms. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 2011, 142, 740-746.
[44]
Louie, B.E.; Farivar, A.S.; Aye, R.W.; Vallières, E. Early experience with robotic lung resection results in similar operative outcomes and morbidity when compared with matched video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases. Ann. Thorac. Surg., 2012, 93, 1598-1604. discussion 1604-1605.
[45]
Park, B.J.; Melfi, F.; Mussi, A.; Maisonneuve, P.; Spaggiari, L.; Da Silva, R.K.; Veronesi, G. Robotic lobectomy for non- small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Long-term oncologic re- sults. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 2012, 143, 383-389.
[46]
Veronesi, G. Robotic surgery for the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. Curr. Opin. Oncol., 2013, 25, 107-114.

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
56
7
1
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy