Abstract
Background: Numerous naturally occurring and artificially synthesized flavonoids have garnered attention for their impressive ability to combat oxidative stress and scavenge free radicals when evaluated in laboratory settings. The core aim of our investigation revolved around assessing the antioxidant potential of a diverse range of synthesized flavonoids through in vitro experiments.
Method: We crafted 29 distinct flavonoids using the aldol condensation mechanism via a chalcone intermediate to accomplish this. We meticulously characterized these newly formed compounds using a variety of spectroscopic techniques. We employed the widely recognized DPPH free radical method for the crucial antioxidant evaluation, a benchmark in such studies.
Result: The radical scavenging efficacy of our synthesized flavonoids was then meticulously compared to that of the positive control, ascorbic acid, renowned for its antioxidant prowess, and the IC50 values for each compound were calculated and examined. Surprisingly, our results showed that the flavonoids we tested had a wide range of antioxidant activity, with IC50 values that ranged from 75.8 ± 8.30 to 397 ± 25.10 μg/mL.
Conclusion: Intriguingly, compounds US5, US13, US16, US17, US18, and US21 outshone even ascorbic acid in their antioxidant potential, displaying remarkable scavenging abilities against free radicals. This discovery holds promise for further exploration of these compounds as potential antioxidants with potential applications in health and wellness.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.126.2.485] [PMID: 11402179]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11101-018-9568-y]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.12526] [PMID: 24117919]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox10040587] [PMID: 33920414]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2020.1714194]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ijfe-2019-0315]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232185] [PMID: 32396536]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/162750] [PMID: 24470791]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1677/joe.0.0520299] [PMID: 5015385]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/endo-103-5-1860] [PMID: 570914]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.877525] [PMID: 3319561]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3835(96)04557-0] [PMID: 9066718]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.6474163] [PMID: 6474163]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9810685] [PMID: 9435150]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0960-0760(94)90030-2] [PMID: 8049151]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.077073] [PMID: 16760481]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox9080681] [PMID: 32751256]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox2040340] [PMID: 26784469]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4150897] [PMID: 33014269]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5335-9_13] [PMID: 9781303]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2005.03.002] [PMID: 15882656]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12291-014-0446-0] [PMID: 25646037]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25225243] [PMID: 33187049]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1871520621666210827104406] [PMID: 34455966]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i2.15928]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crgsc.2020.100041]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/ojc/280201]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2012.02.108]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2011.10.074] [PMID: 22112540]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26237177] [PMID: 34885754]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jphp.13131] [PMID: 31218685]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15376510701511448] [PMID: 20020865]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0891-5849(95)02047-0] [PMID: 8720903]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/np9904509] [PMID: 10924197]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf8006568] [PMID: 18593176]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(90)86128-I] [PMID: 2172711]