Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Neurovascular Research

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1567-2026
ISSN (Online): 1875-5739

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Clinical Trial

The Effect of Remote Ischemic Postconditioning on Quality of Life and Clinical Events after an Ischemic Stroke

Author(s): Thijs P. Kerstens, Thijs R.J. Landman, Yvonne Schoon, Frederick J.A. Meijer, Michiel C. Warlé, Frank-Erik de Leeuw and Dick H.J. Thijssen*

Volume 20, Issue 4, 2023

Published on: 01 December, 2023

Page: [472 - 479] Pages: 8

DOI: 10.2174/0115672026275008231120063757

Price: $65

Abstract

Objectives: Repeated remote ischemic postconditioning (rIPostC) may be an easily applicable treatment following ischemic stroke to improve quality of life (QoL) and clinical outcomes. rIPostC consists of repeated, brief periods of limb ischemia (through inflation of a blood pressure cuff), followed by reperfusion. This study investigated the 1-year follow-up of rIPostC on QoL and clinical events.

Methods: As part of a randomized controlled trial, adult patients with an ischemic stroke within 24 hours after onset of symptoms were randomized to repeated rIPostC or sham-conditioning. rIPostC was applied twice daily during hospitalization (maximum of 4 days). QoL and patientreported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed at 12-week and 1-year follow-ups. Additionally, we explored the effect of repeated rIPostC on clinical events (recurrent cerebrovascular events, hospitalization, and mortality).

Results: The trial was preliminarily stopped due to limitations in recruitment after the inclusion of 88 patients (rIPostC: 40; sham-conditioning: 48) (70 years, 68% male). Questionnaires were returned by 69 (78%) and 63 (72%) participants after 12 weeks and 1 year, respectively. The median difference of the stroke-specific QoL between rIPostC and sham-conditioning was 0.05 (p =0.986) and -0.16 (p =0.654) after 12 weeks and 1-year, respectively. No significant effect of rIPostC on the different domains of PROMs was detected. We observed no between-group differences in recurrent cerebrovascular events, hospitalization, or all-cause mortality (Hazard Ratios p >0.05).

Conclusion: In this exploratory analysis, we observed no significant difference between repeated rIPostC and usual care on QoL and clinical outcomes at 12 weeks and 1 year in patients with an ischemic stroke.

Clinical Trial Registration Number: NTR6880.

« Previous Next »
[1]
Hess DC, Blauenfeldt RA, Andersen G. et al.Remote ischaemic conditioning: A new paradigm of self-protection in the brain. Nat Rev Neurol 2015; 11(12): 698-710.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2015.223] [PMID: 26585977]
[2]
Kharbanda RK, Mortensen UM, White PA. et al.Transient limb ischemia induces remote ischemic preconditioning in vivo. Circulation 2002; 106(23): 2881-3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000043806.51912.9B] [PMID: 12460865]
[3]
Iadecola C, Anrather J. Stroke research at a crossroad: Asking the brain for directions. Nat Neurosci 2011; 14(11): 1363-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.2953] [PMID: 22030546]
[4]
Wang Y, Reis C, Applegate RII, Stier G, Martin R, Zhang JH. Ischemic conditioning-induced endogenous brain protection: Applications pre-, per- or post-stroke. Exp Neurol 2015; 272: 26-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.04.009] [PMID: 25900056]
[5]
Chen G, Ye X, Zhang J. et al.Limb remote ischemic postconditioning reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury by inhibiting NADPH oxidase activation and MyD88-TRAF6-P38MAP-kinase pathway of neutrophils. Int J Mol Sci 2016; 17(12): 1971.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms17121971] [PMID: 27898007]
[6]
Hausenloy DJ, Barrabes JA, Bøtker HE. et al.Ischaemic conditioning and targeting reperfusion injury: A 30 year voyage of discovery. Basic Res Cardiol 2016; 111(6): 70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00395-016-0588-8] [PMID: 27766474]
[7]
Landman TRJ, Schoon Y, Warlé MC, de Leeuw FE, Thijssen DHJ. Remote ischemic conditioning as an additional treatment for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2019; 50(7): 1934-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025494] [PMID: 31154944]
[8]
Meng R, Ding Y, Asmaro K. et al.Ischemic conditioning is safe and effective for octo- and nonagenarians in stroke prevention and treatment. Neurotherapeutics 2015; 12(3): 667-77.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13311-015-0358-6] [PMID: 25956401]
[9]
Chen HS, Cui Y, Li XQ. et al.Effect of remote ischemic conditioning vs usual care on neurologic function in patients with acute moderate ischemic stroke. JAMA 2022; 328(7): 627-36.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.13123] [PMID: 35972485]
[10]
Meng R, Asmaro K, Meng L. et al.Upper limb ischemic preconditioning prevents recurrent stroke in intracranial arterial stenosis. Neurology 2012; 79(18): 1853-61.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318271f76a] [PMID: 23035060]
[11]
Landman T, Schoon Y, Warlé M, De Leeuw FE, Thijssen D. The effect of repeated remote ischemic postconditioning on infarct size in patients with an ischemic stroke (REPOST): Study protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Trials 2019; 20(1): 167.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3264-0] [PMID: 30876432]
[12]
Landman TR, Schoon Y, Warle MC, Meijer FJ, Leeuw FE, Thijssen DH. The effect of repeated remote ischemic postconditioning after an ischemic stroke (REPOST): A randomized controlled trial. Int J Stroke 2022; 17474930221104710.
[PMID: 35593677]
[13]
Muus I, Williams LS, Ringsberg KC. Validation of the stroke specific quality of life scale (SS-QOL): Test of reliability and validity of the Danish version (SS-QOL-DK). Clin Rehabil 2007; 21(7): 620-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215507075504] [PMID: 17702704]
[14]
Hems M, Harkes M, Moret-Hartman M, Melis RJF, Schoon Y. Patient reported outcome measures in geriatric care: first experiences. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr 2017; 48(6): 287-96.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12439-017-0237-1] [PMID: 29119368]
[15]
Lutomski JE, Santoso AMM, Hofman CS, Olde Rikkert MGM, Melis RJF. Responsiveness of the full-length and short form of the older persons and informal caregivers survey. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2017; 18(9): 804-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2017.06.026] [PMID: 28859819]
[16]
Team RCR. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: Foundation for Statistical Computing 2019.
[17]
Pico F, Lapergue B, Ferrigno M. et al.Effect of in hospital remote ischemic perconditioning on brain infarction growth and clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke. JAMA Neurol 2020; 77(6): 725-34.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.0326] [PMID: 32227157]
[18]
Kan X, Yan Z, Wang F. et al.Efficacy and safety of remote ischemic conditioning for acute ischemic stroke: A comprehensive meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials. CNS Neurosci Ther 2023; 29(9): 2445-56.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cns.14240] [PMID: 37183341]
[19]
Gutierrez J, Turan TN, Hoh BL, Chimowitz MI. Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: Risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. Lancet Neurol 2022; 21(4): 355-68.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00376-8] [PMID: 35143758]
[20]
Blauenfeldt RA, Hjort N, Gude MF. et al.A multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial on REmote iSchemic conditioning In patients with acute STroke (RESIST): Rationale and study design. Eur Stroke J 2020; 5(1): 94-101.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2396987319884408] [PMID: 32232175]
[21]
Blauenfeldt RA, Hjort N, Valentin JB, Homburg A-M, Modrau B, Sandal B. ESOC 2023: Late breaking abstracts: Remote ischemic conditioning in patients with acute stroke: A multicenter randomised, patient-assessor blinded, sham-controlled study (RESIST). Eur Stroke J 2023; 8(2) (Suppl.): 670-711.
[22]
England T, Havard D, Haywood L, Stanyard E, Craig J, Isheanesu Mhlangra I. et al.ESOC 2023 Abstract Book: Remote ischaemic conditioning after stroke 3 (RECAST-3): A multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur Stroke J 2023; 8(2) (Suppl.): 486.
[23]
Zhao W, Hausenloy DJ, Hess DC, Yellon DM, Ji X. Remote ischemic conditioning: Challenges and opportunities. Stroke 2023; 54(8): 2204-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043279] [PMID: 37417240]
[24]
Keevil H, Phillips BE, England TJ. Remote ischemic conditioning for stroke: A critical systematic review. Int J Stroke 2023; 0(0): 17474930231191082.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17474930231191082] [PMID: 37466245]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy