Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Coronaviruses

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 2666-7967
ISSN (Online): 2666-7975

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

COVID-19 Pandemic and its Economic Impact on the Global Economy: A Computable General Equilibrium Approach

Author(s): Esambe Sone and Jong-Hwan Ko*

Volume 5, Issue 2, 2024

Published on: 14 November, 2023

Article ID: e141123223566 Pages: 15

DOI: 10.2174/0126667975269693231107072320

Price: $65

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV- 2, has been a global health crisis since its emergence in late 2019, impacting all aspects of life worldwide. It has revealed vulnerabilities in healthcare systems while also inspiring scientific advancements and cooperation in developing vaccines, highlighting the importance of preparedness and equitable healthcare for future challenges.

Method: This paper evaluates the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global economy. The study employed the Global Trade Analysis Project model using GTAP database version 10A with 2014 as the base year. The database's 141 regions and 65 sectors are aggregated into 20 regions and 29 sectors. The model used involves a baseline and two policy scenarios. The baseline scenario projected the global economy to 2020 from 2014 using macroeconomic variables, such as real GDP, population, capital stock, and labor supply. Policy scenarios 1 and 2 accounted for the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and fiscal stimulus package, respectively.

Result: The impacts of the pandemic are measured in real GDP, welfare, export and import volumes, trade balance, and output by sector. Simulation results indicate that the real GDP for all regions declined. The impact of COVID-19 on the welfare of countries, including Korea, Japan, the US, Mexico, China, Italy, and Great Britain, varied. In all these countries, the pandemic highlighted existing inequalities and vulnerabilities, affecting countries disproportionately. Government interventions, such as stimulus packages, income support programs, and vaccination campaigns, have aimed to mitigate the impact and support the welfare of the population. The pandemic disrupted global supply chains and increased trade costs, thereby negatively impacting both import and export volumes. The output of some sectors, such as tourism-related sectors, was heavily affected.

Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted real GDP, welfare, export and import volumes, trade balance, and output by sector. By examining the specific implications of the pandemic on each of these economic factors, policymakers and researchers can gain valuable insights into the challenges faced and potential avenues for recovery.

[1]
Bartik AW, Bertrand M, Cullen Z, Glaeser EL, Luca M, Stanton C. The impact of COVID-19 on small business outcomes and expectations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2020; 117(30): 17656-66.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006991117] [PMID: 32651281]
[2]
World tourism barometer and statistical annex. 2020; 18(7): 1-36. Available from: [https://www.eunwto.org/doi/abs/10.18111/wtobarometereng.2020.18.1.7]
[3]
Gössling S, Scott D, Hall CM. Pandemics, tourism and global change: A rapid assessment of COVID-19. J Sustain Tour 2021; 29(1): 1-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1758708]
[4]
Case A, Deaton A. The epidemic of despair: Will America’s mortality crisis spread to the rest of the world? Foreign Aff 2020; 99: 92. Available from: [https://searchworks.stanford.edu/articles/bth_141800744]
[5]
Pindyck R. COVID-19 and the welfare effects of reducing contagion. NBER Work Pap Ser 2020; 27121.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w27121]
[6]
Banerjee R, Duval R, Gilchrist S. The global impact of COVID-19 on firms: Evidence from firm-level surveys. IMF Working Paper 2020; 20-95.
[7]
Narayanan B, Villafuerte J. Estimating the economic impact of COVID-19: A supply side analysis. 2020. Available from: [https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/res_display.asp?RecordID=6141]
[8]
Annual GDP growth 2023. Available from: [https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ny.gdp.mktp.kd.zg]
[9]
Maliszewska M, Mattoo A, Van der Mensbrugghe D. The potential impact of COVID-19 on GDP and trade: a preliminary assessment. Policy Research Working Paper 2020. Available from: [HTTP://HDL.HANDLE.NET/10986/33605]
[10]
Yoon SH, Ko JH. The impact of COVID-19 on the world economy. IAGBT 2022; 18(2): 79-98.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.20294/jgbt.2022.18.2.79]
[11]
Wickramasinghe K, Naranpanawa A. Systematic literature review on computable general equilibrium applications in tourism. Tour Econ 2022; 28(6): 1647-68.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13548166211006988]
[12]
Keogh-Brown MR, Jensen HT, Edmunds WJ, Smith RD. The impact of COVID-19, associated behaviours and policies on the UK economy: A computable general equilibrium model. SSM Popul Health 2020; 12: 100651.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100651] [PMID: 33072839]
[13]
Aydın L, Ari I. The impact of COVID-19 on Turkey’s non-recoverable economic sectors compensating with falling crude oil prices: A computable general equilibrium analysis. Energy Exploration & Exploitation 2020; 38(5): 1810-30.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0144598720934007]
[14]
Ma X, Chen X. Scenario analysis on the macroeconomic impact of COVID-19: A computable general equilibrium approach. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 2022; 58(1): 102-15.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2021.1987213]
[15]
Jawad M, Maroof Z, Naz M. Impact of pandemic COVID‐19 on global economies (a seven‐scenario analysis). MDE Manage Decis Econ 2021; 42(7): 1897-908.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mde.3337] [PMID: 34230719]
[16]
Singh S, Chamola P, Kumar V, Verma P, Makkar N. Explaining the revival strategies of Indian MSMEs to mitigate the effects of COVID-19 outbreak. Benchmarking 2023; 30(1): 121-48.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2021-0497]
[17]
Ataguba JE. COVID-19 pandemic, a war to be won: Understanding its economic implications for Africa. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2020; 18(3): 325-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-020-00580-x] [PMID: 32249362]
[18]
Kumar V, Verma P, Mittal A, et al. Adoption of ICTs as an emergent business strategy during and following COVID-19 crisis: Evidence from Indian MSMEs benchmarking. Int J 2023; 30(6): 1850-83.
[19]
Kumar V, Nguyen HTT, Mittal A, Lai KK. The production and distribution of face masks to other countries: A strategic approach of Taiwan during COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing 2023; 16(2): 541-67.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JGOSS-11-2021-0096]
[20]
Kumar V, Ya KZ, Lai KK. Mapping the key challenges and managing the opportunities in supply chain distribution during COVID-19: A case of Myanmar pharmaceutical company. J Glob Oper Strateg Sourc 2023; 16(2): 187-223.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JGOSS-01-2022-0002]
[21]
Rose A, Walmsley T, Wei D. Spatial transmission of the economic impacts of COVID-19 through international trade. Lett Spat Resour Sci 2021; 14(2): 169-96.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12076-021-00271-8] [PMID: 34394760]
[22]
Kim E, Jin D, Lee H, Jiang M. The economic damage of COVID-19 on regional economies: An application of a spatial computable general equilibrium model to South Korea. Ann Reg Sci 2022; 1-26.
[PMID: 35990375]
[23]
Guo YM, Shi YR. Impact of the VAT reduction policy on local fiscal pressure in China in light of the COVID-19 pandemic: A measurement based on a computable general equilibrium model. Econ Anal Policy 2021; 69: 253-64.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.12.010] [PMID: 35702722]
[24]
Corong E, Thomas H, Robert MD, Tsigas M, van der Mensbrugghe D. The standard GTAP model, version 7. J Glob Econ Anal 2017; 2(1): 1-119.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.21642/JGEA.020101AF]
[25]
McDougall R. A new regional household demand system for GTAP 2002. (No. 1236-2016-101368). Available from: [https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=gtaptp]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.21642/GTAP.TP]
[26]
Armington PS. A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. In: Staff Papers-International Monetary Fund. 1969; pp. 159-78. Available from: [https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/024/1969/001/article-A007-en.xml]
[27]
Aguiar A, Chepeliev M, Corong EL, McDougall R, van der Mensbrugghe D. The GTAP data base: Version 10. J Glob Econ Anal 2019; 4(1): 1-27.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.21642/JGEA.040101AF]
[28]
Real GDP. Available from: [https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ny.gdp.mktp.kd]
[29]
Population. Available from: [https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/sp.pop.totl]
[30]
Households and NPISHS final consumption expenditure. Available from: [https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ne.con.prvt.cd/]
[31]
Labor force. Available from: [https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ sl.tlf.totl.in]
[32]
Investment and capital stock dataset 1960-2019. 2021. Available from: [https://infrastructuregovern.imf.org/content/dam/PIMA/Knowledge-Hub/dataset/IMFInvestmentandCapitalStockDataset2021.xlsx]
[33]
Database of fiscal policy responses to COVID-19. Available from: [https://www.imf.org/en/topics/imf-and-covid19/fiscal-policies-database-in-response-to-COVID-19]
[34]
Investment. Available from: [https://data.oecd.org/gdp/investment-gfcf.htm]
[35]
Statistics on unemployment and labor underutilization. Available from: [https://ilostat.ilo.org/topics/unemployment-and-labour-underutilization/]
[36]
Inbound tourism expenditure. 2023. Available from: [unwtoinbound-expenditure-data.xlsx (live.com).
[37]
Evans DK, Goldstein M, Popova A. Health-care worker mortality and the legacy of the Ebola epidemic. Lancet Glob Health 2015; 3(8): e439-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00065-0] [PMID: 26163833]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy