Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Case Report

Discrepancies between Screening Sonography and Ultrasound in Emergency Department – A Case Report

Author(s): Sérgio Miravent, Teresa Figueiredo, Inna Donchenko, Manuel Duarte Lobo*, Gualter Cruz and Rui Pedro Almeida

Volume 20, 2024

Published on: 23 October, 2023

Article ID: e15734056249805 Pages: 4

DOI: 10.2174/0115734056249805231003052141

Price: $65

Abstract

Introduction: This case report presents a discrepancy in sonographic findings between a screening sonography performed by a Sonographer in the Basic Emergency Service (BES) and a subsequent ultrasound performed by a Radiologist physician in a Referral Hospital (RH). The aim of this report is to discuss the possible reasons for the discrepancy and its implications for patient care.

Case Presentation: A patient with a history of epigastric pain and vomiting underwent screening sonography in a BES, which suggested Intrahepatic Biliary Dilatation Duct (IHBD) and main pancreatic duct dilatation. The patient was subsequently referred to the RH for further evaluation. However, the Radiologist in the RH did not confirm any of the initial suspicions from BES through a normal ultrasound procedure. The discrepancy raises questions regarding the quality of the screening ultrasound, misinterpretation of the BES images, or the potential for ambiguity in the point of care ultrasound (POCUS) exam.

Conclusion: The differences in sonographic findings between BES and RH, in this case, suggest that the improvement of the patient's clinical condition and therapeutic interventions may have contributed to the discrepancy. Further investigation and standardization of POCUS training and interpretation may improve diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.

[1]
von Herbay A, Kühnel J, Frieling T, Häussinger D. Color doppler sonography avoids misinterpretation of the “parallel channel sign” in the sonographic diagnosis of cholestasis. J Clin Ultrasound 1999; 27(8): 426-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0096(199910)27:8<426::AID-JCU3>3.0.CO;2-X] [PMID: 10477884]
[2]
Ćwik G, Gierbliński IW. Errors and mistakes in the ultrasound diagnosis of the pancreas. J Ultrason 2013; 13(53): 178-91.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2013.0018] [PMID: 26674270]
[3]
Conway S. 3-Piece Suit Radiologist: Ultrasound is back in style, but does its quality match? Appl Radiol 2015; 44(3): 30-1.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.37549/AR2161]
[4]
Lobo MJCD, Tavares SCCNM, Pereira de Almeida RP. Point of care prehospital ultrasound in Basic Emergency Services in Portugal. Health Sci Rep 2022; 5(5): e847.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.847] [PMID: 36189415]
[5]
Lal N, Mehra S, Lal V. Ultrasonographic measurement of normal common bile duct diameter and its correlation with age, sex and anthropometry. J Clin Diagn Res 2014; 8(12): AC01-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/8738.5232] [PMID: 25653927]
[6]
Lahham S, Becker BA, Gari A, et al. Utility of common bile duct measurement in ED point of care ultrasound: A prospective study. Am J Emerg Med 2018; 36(6): 962-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2017.10.064] [PMID: 29162442]
[7]
Vardar BU, Dupuis CS, Goldstein AJ, Vardar Z, Kim YH. Ultrasonographic evaluation of patients with abnormal liver function tests in the emergency department. Ultrasonography 2022; 41(2): 243-62.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.14366/usg.21152] [PMID: 35026887]
[8]
Golse N, Lewin M, Rode A, Sebagh M, Mabrut JY. Gallbladder adenomyomatosis: Diagnosis and management. J Visc Surg 2017; 154(5): 345-53.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2017.06.004] [PMID: 28844704]
[9]
Katabathina VS, Dasyam AK, Dasyam N, Hosseinzadeh K. Adult bile duct strictures: Role of MR imaging and MR cholangiopancreatography in characterization. Radiographics 2014; 34(3): 565-86.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.343125211] [PMID: 24819781]
[10]
Lv Y, Liu N, Wu H, Li Z. Etiological classification and treatment strategies for secondary bile duct dilatation. Exp Biol Med 2021; 246(3): 281-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1535370220966767] [PMID: 33167690]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy