Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

A Preliminary Study of Brain Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Text Reading and Comprehension

Author(s): Qi Xie*, Huixian Chen, Wenjuan He, Zhilin Tan, Yajie Wang and Yanhui Liao

Volume 20, 2024

Published on: 13 October, 2023

Article ID: e060923220761 Pages: 8

DOI: 10.2174/1573405620666230906092301

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Few studies have focused on the changes in human brain function activities caused by reading Chinese characters with different intelligibility and whether it can reflect the understanding and cognitive ability of the human brain.

Objective: Task-fMRI based on Chinese character reading tasks with different intelligibility was used to explore activated brain regions and their cognitive changes.

Methods: Volunteers were randomly recruited using advertisements. Forty volunteers were recruited based on strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 40 volunteers were recruited. Brain function data of 40 healthy right-handed volunteers in fuzzy/clear Chinese reading tasks were collected using a Siemens Skyra 3.0T magnetic resonance scanner. Data were preprocessed and statistically analyzed using the statistical software SPM12.0 to observe the activation of the cortex and analyze its characteristics and possible changes in cognitive function.

Results: Task-fMRI analysis: (1) The main brain regions activated in fuzzy/clear reading tasks were located in the occipital visual cortex (P < 0.001); (2) a paired sample t-test suggested that there was a significant difference in BOLD signals in the brain regions activated by fuzzy/clear reading tasks (P < 0.001, equiv Z = 4.25). Compared with the fuzzy reading task, the brain regions more strongly activated in the clear reading task were mainly located in the right superior frontal gyrus and the bilateral temporal lobe. Compared with the clear reading task, the brain region that was more strongly activated in the fuzzy reading task was mainly located in the right fusiform gyrus.

Conclusion: Clear Chinese character information mainly activates the dorsal stream of the visual-spatial network. This reflects the information transmission of the brain after understanding the text content and is responsible for guiding and controlling attention. Fuzzy words that cannot provide clear text content activate the fusiform gyrus of the ventral stream of the visual-spatial network, strengthening the function of orthographic processing.

[1]
Kim YS, Kwak SM, Myung SK. Caffeine intake from coffee or tea and cognitive disorders: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Neuroepidemiology 2015; 44(1): 51-63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000371710] [PMID: 25721193]
[2]
Rosso A, Mossey J, Lippa CF. Caffeine: neuroprotective functions in cognition and Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen 2008; 23(5): 417-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533317508320083] [PMID: 19230121]
[3]
Weiner MW, Veitch DP, Aisen PS, et al. The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 3: Continued innovation for clinical trial improvement. Alzheimers Dement 2017; 13(5): 561-71.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2016.10.006] [PMID: 27931796]
[4]
Sperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, et al. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging‐Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 2011; 7(3): 280-92.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.003] [PMID: 21514248]
[5]
Park M, Moon WJ, Structural MR. Structural MR imaging in the diagnosis of alzheimer’s disease and other neurodegenerative dementia: Current imaging approach and future perspectives. Korean J Radiol 2016; 17(6): 827-45.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2016.17.6.827] [PMID: 27833399]
[6]
Zhang D, Raichle ME. Disease and the brain’s dark energy. Nat Rev Neurol 2010; 6(1): 15-28.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2009.198] [PMID: 20057496]
[7]
Binnewijzend MAA, Schoonheim MM, Sanz-Arigita E, et al. Resting-state fMRI changes in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging 2012; 33(9): 2018-28.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.07.003] [PMID: 21862179]
[8]
Bennett MR, Farnell L, Gibson WG. Quantitative relations between BOLD responses, cortical energetics, and impulse firing. J Neurophysiol 2018; 119(3): 979-89.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00352.2017] [PMID: 29187550]
[9]
Belliveau JW, Kennedy DN Jr, McKinstry RC, et al. Functional mapping of the human visual cortex by magnetic resonance imaging. Science 1991; 254(5032): 716-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1948051] [PMID: 1948051]
[10]
Buchbinder BR. Functional magnetic resonance imaging. Handb Clin Neurol 2016; 135: 61-92.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53485-9.00004-0] [PMID: 27432660]
[11]
Wang KS, Smith DV, Delgado MR. Using fMRI to study reward processing in humans: Past, present, and future. J Neurophysiol 2016; 115(3): 1664-78.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00333.2015] [PMID: 26740530]
[12]
Bookheimer S. Functional MRI of language: New approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annu Rev Neurosci 2002; 25(1): 151-88.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142946] [PMID: 12052907]
[13]
Fiez JA, Petersen SE. Neuroimaging studies of word reading. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95(3): 914-21.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.3.914] [PMID: 9448259]
[14]
Gernsbacher MA, Kaschak MP. Neuroimaging studies of language production and comprehension. Annu Rev Psychol 2003; 54(1): 91-114.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145128] [PMID: 12359916]
[15]
McCandliss BD, Cohen L, Dehaene S. The visual word form area: Expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends Cogn Sci 2003; 7(7): 293-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00134-7] [PMID: 12860187]
[16]
Vigneau M, Beaucousin V, Hervé PY, et al. Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: Phonology, semantics, and sentence processing. Neuroimage 2006; 30(4): 1414-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.002] [PMID: 16413796]
[17]
Yarkoni T, Speer NK, Balota DA, McAvoy MP, Zacks JM. Pictures of a thousand words: Investigating the neural mechanisms of reading with extremely rapid event-related fMRI. Neuroimage 2008; 42(2): 973-87.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.258] [PMID: 18554928]
[18]
Jobard G, Crivello F, Tzourio-Mazoyer N. Evaluation of the dual route theory of reading: a metanalysis of 35 neuroimaging studies. Neuroimage 2003; 20(2): 693-712.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00343-4] [PMID: 14568445]
[19]
Price CJ. The functional anatomy of word comprehension and production. Trends Cogn Sci 1998; 2(8): 281-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01201-7] [PMID: 21227210]
[20]
Turkeltaub PE, Eden GF, Jones KM, Zeffiro TA. Meta-analysis of the functional neuroanatomy of single-word reading: method and validation. Neuroimage 2002; 16(3): 765-80.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1131] [PMID: 12169260]
[21]
Bartsch AJ, Homola G, Thesen S, et al. Scanning for the scanner: FMRI of audition by read-out omissions from echo-planar imaging. Neuroimage 2007; 35(1): 234-43.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.026] [PMID: 17188900]
[22]
Barbier EL, Marrett S, Danek A, et al. Imaging cortical anatomy by high-resolution MR at 3.0T: Detection of the stripe of Gennari in visual area 17. Magn Reson Med 2002; 48(4): 735-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.10255] [PMID: 12353293]
[23]
Malikovic A, Vucetic B, Milisavljevic M, et al. Occipital sulci of the human brain: Variability and morphometry. Anat Sci Int 2012; 87(2): 61-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12565-011-0118-6] [PMID: 21993979]
[24]
Wohlschläger AM, Specht K, Lie C, et al. Linking retinotopic fMRI mapping and anatomical probability maps of human occipital areas V1 and V2. Neuroimage 2005; 26(1): 73-82.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.021] [PMID: 15862207]
[25]
Goodale MA. How (and why) the visual control of action differs from visual perception. Proc Biol Sci 2014; 281(1785): 20140337.
[26]
Milner AD. How do the two visual streams interact with each other? Exp Brain Res 2017; 235(5): 1297-308.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-4917-4] [PMID: 28255843]
[27]
Dittinger E, Valizadeh SA, Jäncke L, Besson M, Elmer S. Increased functional connectivity in the ventral and dorsal streams during retrieval of novel words in professional musicians. Hum Brain Mapp 2018; 39(2): 722-34.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23877] [PMID: 29105247]
[28]
Buchsbaum BR, D’Esposito M. The search for the phonological store: From loop to convolution. J Cogn Neurosci 2008; 20(5): 762-78.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20501] [PMID: 18201133]
[29]
Salmi J, Rinne T, Koistinen S, Salonen O, Alho K. Brain networks of bottom-up triggered and top-down controlled shifting of auditory attention. Brain Res 2009; 1286: 155-64.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.06.083] [PMID: 19577551]
[30]
Schulze K, Vargha-Khadem F, Mishkin M. Test of a motor theory of long-term auditory memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109(18): 7121-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1204717109] [PMID: 22511719]
[31]
López-Barroso D, Ripollés P, Marco-Pallarés J, et al. Multiple brain networks underpinning word learning from fluent speech revealed by independent component analysis. Neuroimage 2015; 110: 182-93.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.085] [PMID: 25620492]
[32]
Zhao L, Chen C, Shao L, et al. Orthographic and phonological representations in the fusiform cortex. Cereb Cortex 2017; 27(11): 5197-210.
[PMID: 27664959]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy