Abstract
Aim: Present study was conducted to assess the knowledge and perception of men about menstruation and it’s associated problems in their female partners.
Background: Menstruation is considered a social stigma in many low- and middle-income countries.
Objectives: To assess men’s attitudes, beliefs, understandings, and knowledge about menstruation.
Methods: The study involved interviews of 80 male partners of females attending the Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department of the rural tertiary center of Southern India for various complaints over one year. Data obtained was analyzed using thematic analysis. Four themes with sub-themes reflecting responses to key questions were formed: men’s perception and knowledge about menstruation, cultural and societal issues, men’s observation and attitude towards their wives during menstruation, and the father’s role in generating awareness.
Results: Of 80 participants, 92.5% were comfortable, 6.25% uncomfortable and 1.25% were not sure about the interview. Their feelings about menstruation varied from nothing, disgusting/bad, to normal. Men’s knowledge about menstruation was restricted and the majority were hesitant to discuss it. Almost everyone was aware of cultural taboos being followed at home, with most responses revealing menstruating women as untouchable/impure. Men observed changes in mood, sleep, and sexual desire of their partners before and during menstruation. The majority wanted their children to know about menstruation, but they don’t want to teach. Overall feedback about the interview was positive.
Conclusion: Ignorance and secrecy related to menstruation, stop men from understanding the problems faced by women. Educating boys about menstruation and menstrual hygiene is the only way to uproot the long-standing stigma attached to menstruation.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.004] [PMID: 32707266]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0730-5] [PMID: 30777053]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60527-9] [PMID: 18395582]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d2994] [PMID: 21642323]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2007.11.001] [PMID: 18809118]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010290] [PMID: 26936906]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0435-x] [PMID: 29216895]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.2015.002]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12462] [PMID: 24580786]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03700.x] [PMID: 21457380]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239914] [PMID: 33112868]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0b013e3182829b26] [PMID: 23407333]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0701-3]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513X10371609]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2017.1423284] [PMID: 29355396]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1557988313497050] [PMID: 23884789]