Abstract
Introduction: The feasibility of preparing the “in-house” generators and the Th- DTPA(DOTA)-Nimotuzumab radioimmunoconjugate was evaluated. 226Th is perspective for TAT, however, due to short half-life it is preferable to apply this radionuclide for readily available epithelial malignancies. Nimotuzumab being specific for EGFR expressing cells as a targeting moiety is considered to be suitable for thorium delivery.
Methods: TEVA extraction chromatographic resin and anion exchange resin AG 1x8 were used as sorbents for 226Th generator. In order to determine features of labeling by Th4+ we applied 234Th as a longer-lived analog of short-lived 226Th and the immunoconjugates DTPA(DOTA)-Nimotuzumab were used for radiolabeling.
Results: The generator on the base of TEVA resin has shown higher volume activity of the product compared to the AG 1x8. The 226Th volume concentration was up to 80%/mL. The radiolabeling of BFCA by thorium radioisotopes reached 95% at the MR(Th:p-SCN-Bn-DTPA) = 1:100 and 86% for MR(Th:p-SCN-Bn-DOTA) = 1:5000 at 90°C. The procedure of Nimotuzumab labeling with Th4+ for radiotherapy of EGFR-overexpressing carcinomas was established. The overall labeling yield in both radioimmunoconjugates - DTPA and DOTA functionalized - was in the range of 45-50%. The immunoconjugate Nimotuzumab-p-SCN-Bn-DTPA was obtained with a molar ratio 1:25 (Nimotuzumab: BFCA), within 1 hour of conjugation at 25°C and labelled via postconjugation approach. Whereas Nimotuzumab-p-SCN-Bn-DOTA was obtained at the same conditions, but radiolabeled by the method of pre-conjugation.
Conclusion: Thorium-234 incorporation into both radioimmunoconjugates reached 45-50%. It has been shown that Th-DTPA-Nimotuzumab radioimmunoconjugate specifically bound with EGFR overexpressing epidermoid carcinoma A431 cells.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11523-018-0550-9] [PMID: 29423595]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ract-2019-0005]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2020.09.006] [PMID: 33068963]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jlcr.3875] [PMID: 32812275]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ract-2015-2486]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07366299.2022.2088059]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2019.03.051]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S1066362219020140]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2dt30230f] [PMID: 22678751]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2011.12.011] [PMID: 22388013]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13040779] [PMID: 33668474]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05632-5] [PMID: 34837103]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-011-0286-y] [PMID: 22143940]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2018.04.008] [PMID: 30318080]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07366299.2014.896582]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2014.02.010] [PMID: 24681438]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0969-8043(99)00068-8]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(84)90517-7] [PMID: 6440451]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-219X-1-18] [PMID: 22214432]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-169-8:15]
[PMID: 16269603]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-2670(95)00144-O]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2013.04.019] [PMID: 23680558]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07366299.2020.1846892]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2020.02.003] [PMID: 32172796]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/6548668]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0969-8043(98)00151-1] [PMID: 10214708]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ract-2020-0113]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-009-1120-2] [PMID: 19350237]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cbr.2006.321] [PMID: 17651051]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2005.12.004] [PMID: 16546683]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3476] [PMID: 31064781]