Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Research Article

Longitudinal Association between L1 Trabecular Attenuation from Chest Computed Tomography (CT) and Bone Mineral Density from Dualenergy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA)

Author(s): Jiyun Lim, Eunsun Oh*, Suyeon Park, Hyun-Joo Kim, Young Cheol Yoon, Boda Nam, Eun Ji Lee, Jiyoung Hwang, Jewon Jeong and Yun-Woo Chang

Volume 19, Issue 12, 2023

Published on: 09 March, 2023

Article ID: e130223213625 Pages: 6

DOI: 10.2174/1573405619666230213122733

Price: $65

conference banner
Abstract

Background: Many studies have shown that vertebral trabecular attenuation measured on CT scan corresponds well to DXA results for bone mineral density. These studies were based on crosssectional data. Hence, there were limitations in explaining the constantly changing vertebral trabecular attenuation from CT and T-score from DXA over time.

Objective: This study aimed to determine the longitudinal association between the vertebral trabecular attenuation measured on computed tomography (CT) and the T-score measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Methods: We performed a database search for 333 patients who underwent surgery for breast cancer, preoperative treatment, and at least one follow-up chest CT and DXA from January, 2013 through May, 2021. One musculoskeletal radiologist measured the mean vertebral trabecular attenuation of lumbar vertebra 1(L1) on axial unenhanced images at the pedicle level by manually placing the region of interest (ROI). DXA of the lumbar spine was performed, and the lowest T-score of the lumbar spine was used for the analysis. We evaluated the association between L1 trabecular attenuation from chest CT and T-score from DXA over time using the generalized estimating equations (GEE) model to analyze longitudinal corrected data.

Results: A total of 150 women (mean age, 52.4 ± 11.0 years) were included. There was a statistically significant association between L1 trabecular attenuation from chest CT and T-score from DXA in the unadjusted model (p < 0.001) and adjusted model (p < 0.001). T-score value increased by 0.172 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.145-0.200, p < 0.001) per 10 unit (HU) of L1 trabecular attenuation at time = 0 in unadjusted model and by 0.173 (95% CI: 0.143-0.203, p < 0.001) in all adjusted model.

Conclusion: We demonstrated that L1 attenuation from chest CT images was longitudinally associated with T-score from DXA, and the degree of association appeared to be decreased over time in breast cancer patients regardless of their medical condition.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy. Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA 2001; 285(6): 785-95.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.6.785] [PMID: 11176917]
[2]
Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res 2007; 22(3): 465-75.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.061113] [PMID: 17144789]
[3]
Nayak S, Roberts MS, Greenspan SL. Cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155(11): 751-61.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-11-201112060-00007] [PMID: 22147714]
[4]
Bow CH, Cheung E, Cheung CL, et al. Ethnic difference of clinical vertebral fracture risk. Osteoporos Int 2012; 23(3): 879-85.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1627-9] [PMID: 21461720]
[5]
Gralow JR, Biermann JS, Farooki A, et al. NCCN task force report: Bone Health in Cancer Care. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2013; 11 (Suppl. 3): S-1-S-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2013.0215] [PMID: 23997241]
[6]
Garg MK, Kharb S. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: Pitfalls in measurement and interpretation of bone mineral density. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2013; 17(2): 203-10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.109659] [PMID: 23776890]
[7]
Lee SJ, Pickhardt PJ. Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using body CT scans obtained for other indications: The UW experience. Clin Rev Bone Miner Metab 2017; 15(3): 128-37.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12018-017-9235-7]
[8]
Pickhardt PJ, Pooler BD, Lauder T, del Rio AM, Bruce RJ, Binkley N. Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using abdominal computed tomography scans obtained for other indications. Ann Intern Med 2013; 158(8): 588-95.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00003] [PMID: 23588747]
[9]
Jang S, Graffy PM, Ziemlewicz TJ, Lee SJ, Summers RM, Pickhardt PJ. Opportunistic osteoporosis screening at routine abdominal and thoracic CT: Normative L1 trabecular attenuation values in more than 20 000 adults. Radiology 2019; 291(2): 360-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019181648] [PMID: 30912719]
[10]
Li YL, Wong KH, Law MWM, et al. Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis in abdominal computed tomography for Chinese population. Arch Osteoporos 2018; 13(1): 76.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-018-0492-y] [PMID: 29987388]
[11]
Buckens CF, Dijkhuis G, de Keizer B, Verhaar HJ, de Jong PA. Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis on routine computed tomography? An external validation study. Eur Radiol 2015; 25(7): 2074-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3584-0] [PMID: 25591750]
[12]
The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. ISCD Official Positions Adult. 2019. Available from: https://iscd.org/learn/official-positions/adult-positions/ [Accessed Nov 30, 2020].
[13]
Pickhardt PJ, Lee LJ, del Rio AM, et al. Simultaneous screening for osteoporosis at CT colonography: Bone mineral density assessment using MDCT attenuation techniques compared with the DXA reference standard. J Bone Miner Res 2011; 26(9): 2194-03.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.428]
[14]
Gausden EB, Nwachukwu BU, Schreiber JJ, Lorich DG, Lane JM. Opportunistic use of CT imaging for osteoporosis screening and bone density assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99(18): 1580-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.00749] [PMID: 28926388]
[15]
Gerety EL, Hopper MA, Bearcroft PWP. The reliability of measuring the density of the L1 vertebral body on CT imaging as a predictor of bone mineral density. Clin Radiol 2017; 72(2): 177.e9-177.e15.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2016.09.022]
[16]
Pompe E, de Jong PA, de Jong WU, et al. Inter-observer and inter-examination variability of manual vertebral bone attenuation measurements on computed tomography. Eur Radiol 2016; 26(9): 3046-53.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4145-x] [PMID: 26801161]
[17]
Cohen A, Foldes AJ, Hiller N, Simanovsky N, Szalat A. Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis and osteopenia by routine computed tomography scan: A heterogeneous, multiethnic, middle-eastern population validation study. Eur J Radiol 2021; 136109568
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109568] [PMID: 33545629]
[18]
Chen Z, Maricic M, Pettinger M, et al. Osteoporosis and rate of bone loss among postmenopausal survivors of breast cancer. Cancer 2005; 104(7): 1520-30.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21335] [PMID: 16110508]
[19]
Ramin C, May BJ, Roden RBS, et al. Evaluation of osteopenia and osteoporosis in younger breast cancer survivors compared with cancer-free women: A prospective cohort study. Breast Cancer Res 2018; 20(1): 134.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-018-1061-4] [PMID: 30424783]
[20]
Hill DA, Horick NK, Isaacs C, et al. Long-term risk of medical conditions associated with breast cancer treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014; 145(1): 233-43.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2928-4] [PMID: 24696430]
[21]
Haworth CS, Selby PL, Webb AK, et al. Low bone mineral density in adults with cystic fibrosis. Thorax 1999; 54(11): 961-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thx.54.11.961] [PMID: 10525552]
[22]
Grotz WH, Mundinger FA, Rasenack J, et al. Bone loss after kidney transplantation: a longitudinal study in 115 graft recipients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1995; 10(11): 2096-100.
[PMID: 8643174]
[23]
Rebello D, Anjelly D, Grand DJ, et al. Opportunistic screening for bone disease using abdominal CT scans obtained for other reasons in newly diagnosed IBD patients. Osteoporos Int 2018; 29(6): 1359-66.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-018-4444-6] [PMID: 29520605]
[24]
Park SH, Jeong YM, Lee HY, et al. Opportunistic use of chest CT for screening osteoporosis and predicting the risk of incidental fracture in breast cancer patients: A retrospective longitudinal study. PLoS One 2020; 15(10)e0240084
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240084] [PMID: 33052943]
[25]
Jain RK, Lee E, Mathai C, et al. Using opportunistic screening with abdominal CT to identify osteoporosis and osteopenia in patients with diabetes. Osteoporos Int 2020; 31(11): 2189-96.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-020-05521-x] [PMID: 32623489]
[26]
Lenchik L, Weaver AA, Ward RJ, Boone JM, Boutin RD. Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using computed tomography: State of the art and argument for paradigm shift. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2018; 20(12): 74.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11926-018-0784-7] [PMID: 30317448]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy