Abstract
Background: Pancreatic cancer metastasis is characterized by a higher incidence of morbidity and mortality. The present study attempts to identify phytocomponents with the potential to inhibit the secretion of MMP-2 by pancreatic cancer cells and ascertain the efficacy of individual components.
Methods: Overall survival analysis carried out revealed reduced survival of patients with high MMP-2 expression. Data analysis from TCGA revealed increased MMP-2 expression in pancreatic cancer patients compared to adjacent normal tissues. The expression of MMP-2 was reported at different stages of pancreatic cancer (Stage I-IV). To understand the relevance of phytocomponents in binding to the catalytic site of MMP-2, molecular docking studies were performed to find the effectiveness based on Glide score/energy. To substantiate the in-silico analysis, the eight components were also tested in vitro for reducing the survival in PANC-1 cells at three different time points (24, 48, and 72 hours). Finally, zymography analysis was performed using the eight components in the PANC-1 conditioned media of treated cells to ascertain the enzymatic activity of MMP-2.
Results: The obtained results suggest plumbagin, emodin, and EGCG exert potential inhibition in PANC-1 cells, among other phytocomponents tested. Therefore, as assessed using computational studies, the binding ability of plumbagin, emodin, and EGCG can be interpreted as inhibiting effects on MMP-2 activities.
Conclusion: These compounds could find potential application in preventing the progression, sustenance, and metastasis of pancreatic cancer and need to be explored further using a pre-clinical model system in order to validate the efficacy, bioavailability, and safety.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjon1166] [PMID: 30834048]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660] [PMID: 33538338]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20184504] [PMID: 31514451]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11010006] [PMID: 31861620]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000100988] [PMID: 17377415]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010146] [PMID: 35008569]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020210002e1628] [PMID: 35107490]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1381612828666220302153201] [PMID: 35236267]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11033-013-2660-x] [PMID: 24065519]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11081856] [PMID: 31405071]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M601595200] [PMID: 16624823]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molonc.2012.12.001] [PMID: 23273564]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050956] [PMID: 23300530]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules22081329] [PMID: 28820474]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01038] [PMID: 32766132]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2004.07.005]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.05.087] [PMID: 32451085]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ptr.5631] [PMID: 27188216]
[PMID: 21491088]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217676] [PMID: 31150487]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ptr.6971] [PMID: 33258205]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.apha.2019.10.004] [PMID: 32089233]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12249-021-02111-w] [PMID: 34668089]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz430] [PMID: 31114875]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2017.05.002] [PMID: 28732212]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm051256o] [PMID: 17034125]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-07860-2] [PMID: 33568081]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.764] [PMID: 26811623]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-020-00780-z] [PMID: 32988398]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e17-04-0254] [PMID: 28701342]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cddiscovery.2017.6] [PMID: 28250971]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2007.07.020] [PMID: 17764926]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.27478] [PMID: 22322442]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042146] [PMID: 22876305]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/or.2018.6301] [PMID: 29512773]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2021.145774] [PMID: 34126197]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology9040080] [PMID: 32325664]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2018.10.001] [PMID: 30466735]