Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

General Research Article

Cone Beam CT Features and Oral Radiologist’s Decision-making of Arrested Pneumatization of the Sphenoid Sinus

Author(s): Noura Alsufyani*, Nouf Alsuayri and Raghad Alrasheed

Volume 19, Issue 8, 2023

Published on: 26 December, 2022

Article ID: e301122211392 Pages: 7

DOI: 10.2174/1573405619666221130115929

Price: $65

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the demographic and radiographic features of arrested pneumatization of the sphenoid sinus (APS) and their influence on the confidence of oral and maxillofacial radiologists (OMFRs) in diagnosing APS.

Methods: Reports of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) APS were retrieved, and the demographic and radiographic features were retrospectively analyzed. Five OMFRs assessed the CBCT images and their confidence in diagnosing APS. The OMFRs’ experience (years), expertise (skull-base CBCT cases/month) and diagnostic confidence level were analyzed for agreement and associations with demographic or radiographic features.

Results: Of 29 APS cases, 17 (58.6%) were females, and the mean age was 29.9±19 years. Twenty cases (69.0%) presented unilaterally, and 27 (93.1%) involved the sphenoid body. The most common accessory site was the pterygoid process (19, 65.5%). The vidian canal and foramen rotundum were involved in 27 (93.1%) and 17 (58.6%) cases, respectively. Most cases (28, 96.6%) were well-defined, corticated, and showed mixed attenuation. APS diagnostic confidence was higher among the expert OMFRs (72.4%-82.8% vs. 58.6%-62.1%).

Conclusion: Radiographic features differentiating APS from skull-base tumors were shown on CBCT. The confidence of OMFRs with similar experience in years depended on their frequency of examining CBCT cases involving the skull base.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Tahmasbi-Arashlow M, Barghan S, Bennett J, Katkar R, Nair M. Arrested pneumatization of the sphenoid sinus on large field-of-view cone beam computed tomography studies. Dent J 2015; 3(2): 67-76.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj3020067] [PMID: 29567926]
[2]
Welker KM, DeLone DR, Lane JI, Gilbertson JR. Arrested pneumatization of the skull base: Imaging characteristics. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190(6): 1691-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3131] [PMID: 18492926]
[3]
Arpaci T. Arrested pneumatization of the sphenoid sinus mimicking skull base tumours: MRI prevalence in children with haematologic diseases. Int J Neurosci 2018; 128(11): 1040-3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207454.2018.1473397] [PMID: 29724144]
[4]
Jalali E, Tadinada A. Arrested pneumatization of the sphenoid sinus mimicking intraosseous lesions of the skull base. Imaging Sci Dent 2015; 45(1): 67-72.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2015.45.1.67] [PMID: 25793186]
[5]
Altınbaş N, Güral G, Gunes A, Derinkuyu B, Unlu H. Arrested pneumatization in pediatric age group: Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings. J Pediatr Neuroradiol 2015; 4: 7-10.
[6]
Kuntzler S, Jankowski R. Arrested pneumatization: Witness of paranasal sinuses development? Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2014; 131(3): 167-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2013.01.008] [PMID: 24709406]
[7]
Prabhu AV, Branstetter BF IV. The CT Prevalence of arrested pneumatization of the sphenoid sinus in patients with sickle cell disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016; 37(10): 1916-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4801] [PMID: 27151749]
[8]
Duignan M, Wood A. Arrested pneumatization of the skull base: An under-recognized skull base anomaly. ANZ Journal of Surgery 2021; 91(1-2): 69-71.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.16118]
[9]
Badran K, Tarifi A, Shatarat A, Badran D. Sphenoid sinus pneumatization: The good, the bad, and the beautiful. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 279(9): 4435-41.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07297-8] [PMID: 35246749]
[10]
Bilgir E. Bayrakdar İŞ. A new classification proposal for sphenoid sinus pneumatization: A retrospective radio-anatomic study. Oral Radiol 2021; 37(1): 118-24.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11282-020-00467-6] [PMID: 32699975]
[11]
Rahmati A, Ghafari R. AnjomShoa M. Normal variations of sphenoid sinus and the adjacent structures detected in cone beam computed tomography. J Dent 2016; 17(1): 32-7.
[PMID: 26966706]
[12]
Özer CM, Atalar K, Öz II, Toprak S, Barut Ç. Sphenoid sinus in relation to age, gender, and cephalometric indices. J Craniofac Surg 2018; 29(8): 2319-26.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004869] [PMID: 30320684]
[13]
De Jong MD, Fassaert TA, Ranschaert ER. Arrested pneumatization of the skull base. JBR-BTR 2011; 94(3): 114-5.
[PMID: 21874801]
[14]
Hammer R, Butaric L. Arrested pneumatization with extramedullary hematopoiesis of the clivus/sphenoid simulating metastatic carcinoma. Austin J Anat 2014; 1: 1008.
[15]
Katz J, Underhill T. Arrested pneumatization of the sphenoid sinus. Quintessence Int 2013; 44(6): 437-41.
[PMID: 23534054]
[16]
Park SH, Hwang JH. Arrested pneumatization of the sphenoid sinus in the skull base. Brain Tumor Res Treat 2021; 9(1): 40-3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.14791/btrt.2021.9.e2] [PMID: 33913272]
[17]
Jadhav AB, Tadinada A, Rengasamy K, Fellows D, Lurie AG. Clival lesion incidentally discovered on cone-beam computed tomography: A case report and review of the literature. Imaging Sci Dent 2014; 44(2): 165-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2014.44.2.165] [PMID: 24944968]
[18]
Pekcevik Y, Arslan IB, Arslan Y. CT and MRI findings of the incidental intraosseous lipomatous lesions of the sphenoid bone. Head Neck 2016; 38(2): E41-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.24116] [PMID: 25917922]
[19]
Vallabhaneni D, Mohamed A, Badar Z, Mangla R. Enhancing mass lesion of the sphenoid: Atypical presentation of ongoing pneumatization. Case Rep Pediatr 2016; 2016: 1-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2862010] [PMID: 28058123]
[20]
Arrested pneumatization of the sphenoid sinus: A normal variant that can be confused with a pathological entity. Ulutas Med J 2019; 5: 170-4.
[21]
Peña BMG, Taylor GA. Radiologists’ confidence in interpretation of sonography and CT in suspected pediatric appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175(1): 71-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.175.1.1750071] [PMID: 10882249]
[22]
Waite S, Scott J, Gale B, Fuchs T, Kolla S, Reede D. Interpretive error in radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017; 208(4): 739-49.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.16963] [PMID: 28026210]
[23]
Jaspan O, Wysocka A, Sanchez C, Schweitzer AD. Improving the relationship between confidence and competence: Implications for diagnostic radiology training from the psychology and medical literature. Acad Radiol 2022; 29(3): 428-38.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.12.006] [PMID: 33408052]
[24]
Srubiski A, Csillag A, Timperley D, Kalish L, Qiu MR, Harvey RJ. Radiological features of the intraosseous lipoma of the sphenoid. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 144(4): 617-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0194599810392878] [PMID: 21493245]
[25]
Brady AP. Error and discrepancy in radiology: Inevitable or avoidable? Insights Imaging 2017; 8(1): 171-82.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-016-0534-1] [PMID: 27928712]
[26]
Waite S, Grigorian A, Alexander RG, et al. Analysis of perceptual expertise in radiology - current knowledge and a new perspective. Front Hum Neurosci 2019; 13: 213.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00213] [PMID: 31293407]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy