Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Research Article

Location of Early Stage Tumor Detection using Microwave Imaging in the Breast Phantom

Author(s): S. Vanaja*, R. Preetha, J. Joselin Jeya Sheela, K. Durga Devi, Gayathry Sobhanan Warrier and Rahul Krishnan

Volume 19, Issue 2, 2023

Published on: 22 August, 2022

Article ID: e210622206245 Pages: 9

DOI: 10.2174/1573405618666220621114937

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Universally, the most predominant cause of female mortality is mainly due to breast cancer. Owing to numerous constraints in the existing imaging technique, researchers are trying out an alternative tool to detect the tumor before going to the miserable stage.

Methods: This article presents a novel method to detect the mean value system for detecting the location of the tumor in different depths by shifting the antenna anywhere in the breast tissue. In addition, an algorithm to reconstruct the breast image, namely Delay-Multiply-and-Sum (DMAS) is followed to identify the tumor implanted in the breast tissue.

Results: The analysis shows that the maximum mean value occurs while the antenna moves very near to the tumor while the mean value reduces while the antenna shifts apart from the tumor location. The mean value in different locations is converted into a microwave image. The high intensity in the image exhibits the precise position of the tumor. This technique can identify the location of early-stage tumor of size 3mm. Multiple tumors of sizes 6mm and 7mm can identify at a depth of 12mm and 18mm in the homogeneous breast phantom. DMAS can provide better imaging results in the early stage tumor of size 3mm embedded in the breast phantom.

Conclusion: Microwave imaging is an efficient technique to differentiate healthy and malignant tissue in the breast. Antenna plays a major role in identifying tumors in the breast in the early stage. Hence a high-performance Ultra Wideband Dielectric Resonator Antenna (DRA-UWB) is used to identify the tumor in the breast. An antenna is sketched in different locations of the breast phantom. On account of the hemispherical structure, the mean value of the reflected signal is high at the center than at the edge. Hence, the difference in mean value is calculated with and without breast phantom for identifying the tumor location. The overall efficiency of this technique can be improved by using a high-performance UWB antenna. The image of the breast is reformed by the DMAS beamforming algorithm.

Keywords: Ultra wideband antenna, tumor, mean value, hemispherical breast phantom and homogeneous, delay-multiplyand- sum, DRA-UWB.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Iakovou I, Giannoula E, Gkantaifi A, Levva S, Frangos S. Positron emission tomography in breast cancer: 18 F-FDG and other radiopharmaceuticals. Eur J Hybrid Imaging 2018; 2(1): 20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41824-018-0039-x]
[2]
Radhakrishna S, Agarwal S, Parikh PM, et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer management. South Asian J Cancer 2018; 7(2): 69-71.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sajc.sajc_104_18] [PMID: 29721466]
[3]
Rodríguez-Ruiz A, Krupinski E, Mordang J-J, et al. Detection of breast cancer with mammography: Effect of an artificial intelligence support system. Radiology 2019; 290(2): 305-14.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018181371] [PMID: 30457482]
[4]
Sung JS, Lebron L, Keating D, et al. Performance of dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography for screening women at increased risk of breast cancer. Radiology 2019; 293(1): 81-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019182660] [PMID: 31453765]
[5]
Løberg M, Lousdal ML, Bretthauer M, Kalager M. Benefits and harms of mammography screening. Breast Cancer Res 2015; 17(1): 63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-015-0525-z] [PMID: 25928287]
[6]
Iranmakani S, Mortezazadeh T, Sajadian F, et al. A review of various modalities in breast imaging: Technical aspects and clinical outcomes. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 2020; 51(1): 1-22.
[7]
Kwon S, Lee S. Recent advances in microwave imaging for breast cancer detection. Int J Biomed Imaging 2016; 2016: 5054912.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5054912] [PMID: 28096808]
[8]
Selvaraj V, Srinivasan P. Interaction of an EM wave with the breast tissue in a microwave imaging technique using an ultra-wideband antenna. Biomed Res India 2017; 28: 3.
[9]
Sohani B, Tiberi G, Ghavami N, Ghavami M, Dudley S, Rahmani A. Microwave imaging for stroke detection: validation on headmimicking phantom. 2019 PhotonIcs & Electromagnetics Research Symposium-Spring (PIERS-Spring). In: IEEE; 2019; pp. 940-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PIERS-Spring46901.2019.9017851]
[10]
Lai JCY, Soh CB, Gunawan E, Low KS. Homogeneous and heterogeneous breast phantoms for ultra-wideband microwave imaging applications. Electromagn waves 2010; 100: 397-415.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2528/PIER09121103]
[11]
2-stage delay-multiply-and-sum beamforming for breast cancer detection using microwave imaging. 2017 Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE). In: IEEE; 2017; pp. 101-6.
[12]
Li X, Davis SK, Hagness SC, Van der Weide DW, Van Veen BD. Microwave imaging via space-time beamforming: Experimental investigation of tumor detection in multilayer breast phantoms. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech 2004; 52(8): 1856-65.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2004.832686]
[13]
Hassan NA, Mohamed MM, Tayel MB. Basic evaluation of antennas used in microwave imaging for breast cancer detection. Comput Sci Inf Technol 2016; 55: 55-63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5121/csit.2016.61005]
[14]
AlShehri SA, Khatun S, Jantan AB, Raja Abdullah RSA, Mahmud R, Awang Z. Experimental breast tumor detection using NN-based UWB imaging. Electromagn waves 2011; 111: 447-65.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2528/PIER10110102]
[15]
Jamlos MA, Mustafa WA, Husna N, et al. Ultra-wideband confocal microwave imaging for brain tumor detection. IOP Conf Series Mater Sci Eng 2019; 557(1): 012002.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/557/1/012002]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy