Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Research Article

Evaluation of CT Scan Diagnostic Value in the Novel Coronavirus Disease and Presenting a Corona CT Severity Index

Author(s): Abdolmajid Taheri, Majid Asadi-Samani, Ebrahim Saedi Dezaki*, Soleiman Kheiri and Elham Taheri

Volume 19, Issue 5, 2023

Published on: 07 September, 2022

Article ID: e150622206039 Pages: 8

DOI: 10.2174/1573405618666220615150052

Price: $65

conference banner
Abstract

Background: Several diagnostic methods were proposed and evaluated for the COVID-19 disease. However, published studies have reported different diagnostic values for these methods.

Aims: The present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and accuracy of CT in the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and developed and presented a Corona CT severity index.

Methods: In this retrospective study, CT diagnostic performance was measured based on sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy, and RT-PCR was regarded as a standard. Patients’ CT reports were evaluated by a radiologist, and scoring and calculating of the CT severity index were performed.

Results: Of 208 patients, 82 showed positive, and 126 showed negative RT-PCR results with a positive frequency of 39.4% (95% CI, 32.7-46.4). The chest CT scan related to 136 patients indicated COVID- 19, whereas the initial RT-PCR assays of 56 patients were negative. Considering RT-PCR results as the reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of chest CT to indicate COVID-19 infection were 100%, 55.6% (95% CI 46.4-64.4%), and 72.8% (95% CI 66.2-78.8%), respectively. The severity of pulmonary involvement was assigned with different grades. For 60.7% of patients with severity grades of 2 to 6, who showed the involvement of at least one lung lobe in CT, PCR retrieved negative results.

Conclusion: CT scan shows an acceptable sensitivity as well as a consistently better specificity to identify COVID-19 pneumonia than PCR. It may be considered a major method to identify COVID-19 in epidemic locations.

Keywords: COVID-19, Pneumonia, Diagnosis, Imaging, Lung computed tomography, Severity index, RT-PCR.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Kaur SP, Gupta V. COVID-19 Vaccine: A comprehensive status report. Virus Res 2020; 288: 198114.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2020.198114] [PMID: 32800805]
[2]
Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 2020; 382(18): 1708-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2002032] [PMID: 32109013]
[3]
Zhang JJ, Dong X, Cao YY, et al. Clinical characteristics of 140 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan, China. Allergy 2020; 75(7): 1730-41.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/all.14238] [PMID: 32077115]
[4]
Yang W, Yan F. Patients with RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 and Normal Chest CT. Radiology 2020; 295(2): E3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200702] [PMID: 32142398]
[5]
Committee GOoNH Office of state administration of traditional Chinese medicine Notice on the issuance of a program for the diagnosis and treatment of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infected pneumonia (trial version 6). 2020.
[6]
Chung M, Bernheim A, Mei X, et al. CT Imaging Features of 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Radiology 2020; 295(1): 202-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200230] [PMID: 32017661]
[7]
Ai T, Yang Z, Hou H, et al. Correlation of chest CT and RT-PCR testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A report of 1014 cases. Radiology 2020; 296(2): E32-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200642] [PMID: 32101510]
[8]
Xie X, Zhong Z, Zhao W, Zheng C, Wang F, Liu J. Chest CT for typical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia: Relationship to negative RT-PCR testing. Radiology 2020; 296(2): E41-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200343] [PMID: 32049601]
[9]
Fang Y, Zhang H, Xie J, et al. Sensitivity of Chest CT for COVID-19: Comparison to RT-PCR. Radiology 2020; 296(2): E115-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200432] [PMID: 32073353]
[10]
Song F, Shi N, Shan F, et al. Emerging 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Pneumonia. Radiology 2020; 297(3): E346.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020209021] [PMID: 33196374]
[11]
Pan F, Ye T, Sun P, Gui S, Liang B, Li L, et al. Time course of lung changes on chest CT during recovery from 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia. Radiology 2020; 200370.
[12]
Güneyli S, Atçeken Z. Doğan H, Altınmakas E, Atasoy KÇ. Radiological approach to COVID-19 pneumonia with an emphasis on chest CT. Diagn Interv Radiol 2020; 26(4): 323-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/dir.2020.20260] [PMID: 32352917]
[13]
Xu B, Xing Y, Peng J, et al. Chest CT for detecting COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy. Eur Radiol 2020; 30(10): 5720-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06934-2] [PMID: 32415585]
[14]
Pan Y, Guan H. Imaging changes in patients with 2019-nCov. Eur Radiol 2020; 30(7): 3612-3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06713-z] [PMID: 32025790]
[15]
Corman VM, Landt O, Kaiser M, et al. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill 2020; 25(3)
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045] [PMID: 31992387]
[16]
Rubin EJ, Baden LR, Morrissey S, Campion EW. Medical journals and the 2019-nCoV outbreak. N Engl J Med 2020; 382(9): 866.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe2001329] [PMID: 31986242]
[17]
Yang Y, Yang M, Yuan J, et al. Laboratory diagnosis and monitoring the viral shedding of 2019-nCoV infections. Innovation (N Y) 2020; 1(3): 100061.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2020.100061] [PMID: 33169119]
[18]
Çinkooğlu A, Bayraktaroğlu S, Savaş R. Lung Changes on Chest CT During 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pneumonia. Eur J Breast Health 2020; 16(2): 89-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/ejbh.2020.010420] [PMID: 32285028]
[19]
Bollineni VR, Nieboer KH, Döring S, Buls N, de Mey J. The role of CT imaging for management of COVID-19 in epidemic area: Early expe-rience from a University Hospital. Insights Imaging 2021; 12(1): 10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00957-5] [PMID: 33512601]
[20]
Inui S, Fujikawa A, Jitsu M, et al. Chest CT findings in cases from the cruise ship diamond princess with Coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging 2020; 2(2): e200110.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/ryct.2020200110] [PMID: 33778566]
[21]
Huang P, Liu T, Huang L, et al. Use of chest CT in combination with negative RT-PCR assay for the 2019 novel coronavirus but high clini-cal suspicion. Radiology 2020; 295(1): 22-3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200330] [PMID: 32049600]
[22]
Caruso D, Zerunian M, Polici M, et al. Chest CT Features of COVID-19 in Rome, Italy. Radiology 2020; 296(2): E79-85.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020201237] [PMID: 32243238]
[23]
Wen Z, Chi Y, Zhang L, et al. Coronavirus Disease 2019: Initial Detection on Chest CT in a Retrospective Multicenter Study of 103 Chinese Patients. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging 2020; 2(2): e200092.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/ryct.2020200092] [PMID: 33778564]
[24]
Mehta V, Jyoti D, Guria RT, Sharma CB. Correlation between chest CT and RT-PCR testing in India’s second COVID-19 wave: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Evid Based Med 2022.
[25]
Rubin GD, Ryerson CJ, Haramati LB, et al. The role of chest imaging in patient management during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multinational consensus statement from the Fleischner Society. Chest 2020; 158(1): 106-16.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.04.003] [PMID: 32275978]
[26]
Long C, Xu H, Shen Q, et al. Diagnosis of the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): rRT-PCR or CT? Eur J Radiol 2020; 126: 108961.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108961] [PMID: 32229322]
[27]
Karam M, Althuwaikh S, Alazemi M, et al. Chest CT versus RT-PCR for the detection of COVID-19: Systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. JRSM Open 2021; 12(5): 20542704211011837.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20542704211011837] [PMID: 34035931]
[28]
Bernheim A, Mei X, Huang M, et al. Chest CT findings in coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19): Relationship to duration of infection. Radiology 2020; 295(3): 200463.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200463] [PMID: 32077789]
[29]
Rong Y, Wang F, Tian J, et al. Clinical and CT features of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 cases after two sequential negative nucleic acid test-ing results: A retrospective analysis. BMC Infect Dis 2021; 21(1): 333.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06013-x] [PMID: 33832444]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy