Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Signal Transduction Therapy

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1574-3624
ISSN (Online): 2212-389X

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

Computational Model for Prediction of Foxo Protein Employing Ensemble Learning Algorithm

Author(s): Shruti Jain*

Volume 17, Issue 3, 2022

Published on: 02 August, 2022

Article ID: e270522205320 Pages: 9

DOI: 10.2174/1574362417666220527091755

Price: $65

Abstract

Aims: In this paper, Forkhead box O (FOXO) protein using the ensemble learning algorithm is predicted. When FOXO is in excess in the human body, it leads to LNCap prostate cancer cells, and if deficit leading neurodegenerative diseases.

Objective: Neurodegenerative diseases, like Alzheimer's and Parkinson's, are neurological illnesses that are caused by damaged brain cells. For prediction of FOXO protein, Gradient Boosted Machine (GBM) and Random forest (RF) techniques are used.

Method: The main idea of using GBM is its non-linear nature but it is difficult for any single decision tree to fit all training. To overcome this, an RF algorithm is used. RF combines the results at the end of the process by average or majority rules, while the GBM algorithm combines the results along the way.

Results: A total of 29.16% improvement has been observed by RF over GBM. Average square error is also evaluated to check the testing and training of data for 100 trees on 100 tree sizes.

Conclusion: In this paper, a computational model for the prediction of FOXO protein using ensemble learning techniques (Random Forest and GBM) has been proposed. If the dataset has many variable features and the prediction accuracy is not as important then RF can be considered. On the other hand, GBMs are better suited for datasets that have very few or fewer input features and where high accuracy predictions are required. However, there are instances when either GBM or RF can perform equally well depending on how they are tuned.

Keywords: System biology, degenerative diseases, diabetes, FKHR, random forest, boosted tree.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Zou Y, Laubichler MD. From systems to biology: A computational analysis of the research articles on systems biology from 1992 to 2013. PLoS One 2018; 13(7): e0200929.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200929] [PMID: 30044828]
[2]
Pollutri D, Gramantieri L, Bolondi L, Fornari F. TP53/microRNA interplay in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci 2016; 17(12): 2029.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms17122029] [PMID: 27918441]
[3]
Jain S. Communication of signals and responses leading to cell survival/cell death using Engineered Regulatory Networks 2012.
[4]
Furuyama T, Nakazawa T, Nakano I, Mori N. Identification of the differential distribution patterns of mRNAs and consensus binding sequences for mouse DAF-16 homologues. Biochem J 2000; 349(Pt 2): 629-34.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/bj3490629] [PMID: 10880363]
[5]
Baitaluk M. System biology of gene regulation. Methods Mol Biol 2009; 569: 55-87.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-524-4_4] [PMID: 19623486]
[6]
Jain S. System modeling of AKT using linear and robust regression analysis. Curr Trends Biotechnol Pharm 2018; 12(2): 177-86.
[7]
Gao F, Yang J, Wang D, et al. Mitophagy in Parkinson’s disease: Pathogenic and therapeutic implications. Front Neurol 2017; 8: 527.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00527] [PMID: 29046661]
[8]
Kieburtz K, Wunderle KB. Parkinson’s disease: Evidence for environmental risk factors. Mov Disord 2013; 28(1): 8-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.25150] [PMID: 23097348]
[9]
Klivenyi P, Vecsei L. Novel therapeutic strategies in Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2010; 66(2): 119-25.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-009-0742-4] [PMID: 19834698]
[10]
Chavoshi MS, Staveley BE. Inhibition of foxo and minibrain in dopaminergic neurons can model aspects of Parkinson Disease in dro-sophila melanogaster. Advances in Parkinson’s Disease 2016; 5(01): 1-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/apd.2016.51001]
[11]
Kim JJ, Li P, Huntley J, Chang JP, Arden KC, Olefsky JM. FoxO1 haploinsufficiency protects against high-fat diet-induced insulin re-sistance with enhanced peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma activation in adipose tissue. Diabetes 2009; 58(6): 1275-82.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/db08-1001] [PMID: 19289458]
[12]
Burgering BM. A brief introduction to FOXOlogy. Oncogene 2008; 27(16): 2258-62.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/onc.2008.29] [PMID: 18391968]
[13]
Anderson MJ, Viars CS, Czekay S, Cavenee WK, Arden KC. Cloning and characterization of three human forkhead genes that comprise an FKHR-like gene subfamily. Genomics 1998; 47(2): 187-99.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/geno.1997.5122] [PMID: 9479491]
[14]
Lalmansingh AS, Karmakar S, Jin Y, Nagaich AK. Multiple modes of chromatin remodeling by Forkhead box pro-teins.BiochimicaetBiophysicaActa (BBA)-. Gene Regulatory Mechanisms 2012; 1819(7): 707-15.
[15]
Jacobs FM, van der Heide LP, Wijchers PJ, Burbach JPH, Hoekman MF, Smidt MP. FoxO6, a novel member of the FoxO class of tran-scription factors with distinct shuttling dynamics. J Biol Chem 2003; 278(38): 35959-67.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M302804200] [PMID: 12857750]
[16]
Chen S, Villalta SA, Agrawal DK. FOXO1 Mediates Vitamin D deficiency-induced insulin resistance in skeletal muscle. J Bone Miner Res 2016; 31(3): 585-95.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2729] [PMID: 26462119]
[17]
Arden KC. FOXO animal models reveal a variety of diverse roles for FOXO transcription factors. Oncogene 2008; 27(16): 2345-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/onc.2008.27] [PMID: 18391976]
[18]
Jain S, Naik PK, Bhooshan SV. Mathematical modeling deciphering balance between cell survival and cell death using Insulin. New Biol 2011; 1(1): 46-58.
[19]
Battiprolu PK, Hojayev B, Jiang N, et al. Metabolic stress-induced activation of FoxO1 triggers diabetic cardiomyopathy in mice. J Clin Invest 2012; 122(3): 1109-18.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI60329] [PMID: 22326951]
[20]
Chong ZZ, Hou J, Shang YC, Wang S, Maiese K. EPO relies upon novel signaling of Wnt1 that requires Akt1, FoxO3a, GSK-3β, and β-catenin to foster vascular integrity during experimental diabetes. Curr Neurovasc Res 2011; 8(2): 103-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/156720211795495402] [PMID: 21443457]
[21]
Jain S. Regression analysis on different mitogenic pathways. New Biol 2016; 6(2): 40-6.
[22]
Jain S, Bhooshan SV, Naik PK. Model of mitogen-activated protein kinases for cell survival/death and its equivalent bio-circuit. Current Research Journal of Biological Sciences 2010; 2(1): 59-71.
[23]
Gaudet S, Janes KA, Albeck JG, Pace EA, Lauffenburger DA, Sorger PK. A compendium of signals and responses triggered by prodeath and prosurvival cytokines. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005; 4(10): 1569-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M500158-MCP200] [PMID: 16030008]
[24]
Weiss R. Cellular computation and communications using engineered genetic regulatory networks 2001.
[25]
Roberto C, Marcello F, Diego L, Del FA, Eduardo M. Balance between cell survival and death: A minimal quantitative model of tumor necrosis factor alpha cytotoxicity BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES. Biophysics and Computational Biology 2009; 1-31.
[26]
Jaitovich A, Angulo M, Lecuona E, et al. High CO2 levels cause skeletal muscle atrophy via AMP-activated kinase (AMPK), FoxO3a pro-tein, and muscle-specific Ring finger protein 1 (MuRF1). J Biol Chem 2015; 290(14): 9183-94.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.625715] [PMID: 25691571]
[27]
Yuan Z, Lehtinen MK, Merlo P, Villén J, Gygi S, Bonni A. Regulation of neuronal cell death by MST1-FOXO1 signaling. J Biol Chem 2009; 284(17): 11285-92.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M900461200] [PMID: 19221179]
[28]
Jain S. Parametric and non-parametric distribution analysis of AKT for cell survival/death. International Intl J Artificial Intel. Soft Comput 2017; 6(1): 43-55.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJAISC.2017.084232]
[29]
Langlet F, Haeusler RA, Lindén D, et al. Selective inhibition of foxo1 activator/repressor balance modulates hepatic glucose handling. Cell 2017; 171(4): 824-835.e18.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.045] [PMID: 29056338]
[30]
Jain S. Design of survival-hazard and mathematical model for high osmolarity glycerol protein using parametric and nonparametric meth-ods. Int J Emerging Technologies 2019; 10(3): 01-9.
[31]
Kwon M-S, Kim M-H, Kim S-H, et al. Erythropoietin exerts cell protective effect by activating PI3K/Akt and MAPK pathways in C6 Cells. Neurol Res 2014; 36(3): 215-23.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1743132813Y.0000000284] [PMID: 24512015]
[32]
Sanese P, Forte G, Disciglio V, Grossi V, Simone C. FOXO3 on the road to longevity: Lessons from SNPs and chromatin hubs. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2019; 17: 737-45.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2019.06.011] [PMID: 31303978]
[33]
Park J, Ko YS, Yoon J, et al. The forkhead transcription factor FOXO1 mediates cisplatin resistance in gastric cancer cells by activating phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt pathway. Gastric Cancer 2014; 17(3): 423-30.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-013-0314-2] [PMID: 24202965]
[34]
Arimoto-Ishida E, Ohmichi M, Mabuchi S, et al. Inhibition of phosphorylation of a forkhead transcription factor sensitizes human ovari-an cancer cells to cisplatin. Endocrinology 2004; 145(4): 2014-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/en.2003-1199] [PMID: 14701673]
[35]
Hellaboina V, Bhat SP, Haddad WM, Bernstein DS. Modeling and analysis of mass-action kinetics. IEEE Control Syst 2009; 29(4): 60-78.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCS.2009.932926]
[36]
Bonab R, Can F. Less is more: A comprehensive framework for the number of components of ensemble classifiers. IEEE Trans Neu Net Learn Sys 14(8)2018;
[37]
Motamedi F, Sanchez H, Mehri A, Ghasemi F. Accelerating big data analysis through LASSO-random forest algorithm in QSAR studies. Bioinformatics 2021; 37(19): 1-7.
[PMID: 34979024]
[38]
Amit Y, Geman D. Shape quantization and recognition with randomized trees. Neural Comput 1997; 9(7): 1545-88.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.7.1545]
[39]
Smith PF, Ganesh S, Liu P. A comparison of random forest regression and multiple linear regression for prediction in neuroscience. J Neurosci Methods 2013; 220(1): 85-91.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.08.024] [PMID: 24012917]
[40]
Shoham R, Permuter H. Amended Cross-Entropy Cost: An Approach for Encouraging Diversity in Classification Ensemble (Brief Announcement). Cyber Security Cryptography and Machine Learning. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2019; 11527: 202-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20951-3_18]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
3
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy