Abstract
Background: Dual-Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) enables the direct measurement of iodine accumulation in the extracellular space.
Objective: To compare measures of liver fibrosis and function with Extracellular Volume (ECV) from iodine/water images using DECT.
Methods: Data was obtained from 119 consecutive patients who underwent abdominal DECT. A region of interest was set in the right lobe of the liver, pancreas, spleen, and aorta on iodine density images. ECV was calculated using the following formula: ECV = (1 − hematocrit) × [iodine concentration in the liver (or pancreas, spleen) / iodine concentration in the aorta]. The severity of liver fibrosis was estimated using the aminotransferase/platelet ratio index (APRI) and the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index. Liver function was assessed by the Child-Pugh classification and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade. Data were analyzed by the Spearman rank correlation coefficient, one-way analysis of variance, and post hoc analysis.
Results: The correlation between ECV and fibrosis indices (APRI and FIB-4) was only significant, with a weak magnitude for liver ECV quantification at the equilibrium phase (r=0.25 and r=0.20, respectively). The correlations between liver function index and ECV quantification were more robust than with fibrosis index. The highest correlations (r=0.50) were found between ALBI grade and liver ECV at the equilibrium phase. Liver ECV values at the equilibrium phase had a significant difference between ALBI grade 1 vs. 2 and grade 1 vs. 3.
Conclusion: Liver ECV quantification by DECT is more suitable for evaluating liver function than liver fibrosis severity.
Keywords: Dual-energy CT, extracellular volume fraction, liver fibrosis, liver functional reserve, aminotransferase/platelet ratio index (APRI), Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, Child-Pugh classification, albumin bilirubin (ALBI) grade.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2013.05.021] [PMID: 23746962]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000479474] [PMID: 29344514]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/rjim-2015-0039] [PMID: 26939206]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-11-201306040-00005] [PMID: 23732714]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000452846] [PMID: 28626732]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.57.9151] [PMID: 25512453]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-01089-7] [PMID: 31587181]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2018.08.018] [PMID: 30262328]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2016.10.003] [PMID: 28341030]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2014.2353044] [PMID: 25181365]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.4.434] [PMID: 22778565]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hepr.13205] [PMID: 29908040]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.10039] [PMID: 24261358]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800600817] [PMID: 4541913]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2003.50346] [PMID: 12883497]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.21178] [PMID: 16729309]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.2016150220] [PMID: 27399237]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000123] [PMID: 25493416]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2016.04.012]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.1840070527] [PMID: 3308669]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI102813] [PMID: 13096569]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14017430802691528] [PMID: 19145534]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.1840080532] [PMID: 2971015]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-12-2]