Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

AI-assisted Method for Efficiently Generating Breast Ultrasound Screening Reports

Author(s): Shuang Ge, Qiongyu Ye, Wenquan Xie, Desheng Sun, Huabin Zhang*, Xiaobo Zhou and Kehong Yuan*

Volume 19, Issue 2, 2023

Published on: 17 May, 2022

Article ID: e290322202728 Pages: 9

DOI: 10.2174/1573405618666220329092537

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Ultrasound is one of the preferred choices for early screening of dense breast cancer. Clinically, doctors have to manually write the screening report, which is time-consuming and laborious, and it is easy to miss and miswrite.

Aim: We proposed a new pipeline to automatically generate AI breast ultrasound screening reports based on ultrasound images, aiming to assist doctors in improving the efficiency of clinical screening and reducing repetitive report writing.

Methods: AI efficiently generated personalized breast ultrasound screening preliminary reports, especially for benign and normal cases, which account for the majority. Doctors then make simple adjustments or corrections based on the preliminary AI report to generate the final report quickly. The approach has been trained and tested using a database of 4809 breast tumor instances.

Results: Experimental results indicate that this pipeline improves doctors' work efficiency by up to 90%, greatly reducing repetitive work.

Conclusion: Personalized report generation is more widely recognized by doctors in clinical practice than non-intelligent reports based on fixed templates or options to fill in the blanks.

Keywords: AI, ultrasound, breast cancer, early screening, report generation, automatic classification, BI-RADS, and benign feature.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71(3): 209-49.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660] [PMID: 33538338]
[2]
Etzioni R, Urban N, Ramsey S, et al. The case for early detection. Nat Rev Cancer 2003; 3(4): 243-52.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc1041] [PMID: 12671663]
[3]
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 2020; 70(1): 7-30.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21590] [PMID: 31912902]
[4]
Duffy SW, Vulkan D, Cuckle H, et al. Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality (UK Age trial): Final results of a randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21(9): 1165-72.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30398-3] [PMID: 32800099]
[5]
Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 2016; 66(2): 115-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21338] [PMID: 26808342]
[6]
Madjar H. Role of breast ultrasound for the detection and differentiation of breast lesions. Breast Care (Basel) 2010; 5(2): 109-14.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000297775] [PMID: 20847824]
[7]
Brem RF, Lenihan MJ, Lieberman J, Torrente J. Screening breast ultrasound: Past, present, and future. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 204(2): 234-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.12072] [PMID: 25615743]
[8]
Jing B, Xie P, Xing E. On the automatic generation of medical imaging reports. ACL. 2018; 1: pp. 2577-86.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/P18-1240]
[9]
Ortega-Loubon C. CulquichicA3n C, Correa R. The importance of writing and publishing case reports during medical training. Cureus 2017; 9(12): e1964.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1964] [PMID: 29492353]
[10]
Bhatia SK, Tiwari S, Mishra KK, Trivedi MC. Advances in Computer Communication and Computational Sciences Proceedings of IC4S; 2018. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore Private Ltd. 2019.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6861-5]
[11]
Wei M, Du Y, Wu X. Automatic classification of benign and malignant breast tumors in ultrasound image with texture and morphological features. In: 2019 IEEE 13th International Conference on Anti- Counterfeiting, Security, and Identification (ASID). 2019 Oct 25-27; Xiamen, China. 126-30
[12]
Hijab A, Rushdi MA, Gomaa MM, Eldeib A. Breast cancer classification in ultrasound images using transfer learning. In: 2019 Fifth International Conference on Advances in Biomedical Engineering (ICABME). 2019 Oct 17-19; Tripoli, Lebanon. 1-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICABME47164.2019.8940291]
[13]
Zeimarani B, Costa MGF, Nurani NZ, Bianco SR, De Albuquerque Pereira WC, Filho CFFC. Breast lesion classification in ultrasound images using deep convolutional neural network IEEE Access 2020; 8: 133349-59
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3010863]
[14]
Minavathi M, Murali S, Dinesh MS. Classification of mass in breast ultrasound images using image processing techniques. Int J Comput Appl 2012; 42: 29-36.
[15]
Chen Y, Ling L, Huang Q. Classification of breast tumors in ultrasound using biclustering mining and neural network. In: 2016 9th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI). 2016 Oct 15-17; Datong, China. 1787-91
[16]
He Y, Yang S, Jhao Y. Breast MRIs reporting aided system. In: 2016 International Symposium on Computer, Consumer and Control (IS3C) 2016 Jul 4-6; Xi’an, China. 2016 Jul 4-6; pp. 1063-6.
[17]
Syeda-Mahmood T, Wong K, Gur Y, et al. Chest X-ray Report Generation through Fine-Grained Label Learning. In: Martel AL, Abolmaesumi P, Stoyanov D, Eds. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2020. Cham: Springer 2020; pp. 561-71.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59713-9_54]
[18]
Gale W, Oakden-Rayner L, Carneiro G, Palmer LG, Bradley AP. Producing radiologist-quality reports for interpretable artificial intelligence. In: 2019 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2019). Venice, Italy. 2019; Apr 8-11; pp. 1275-9.
[19]
Dai Y, Gao Y. TransMed: Transformers advance multi-modal medical image classification. Diagnostics 2021; 11(8): 1384.
[20]
Chen J, Lu Y. TransUNet: Transformers make strong encoders for medical image segmentation. arXiv preprint 2021; arXiv: 210204306.
[21]
He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Las Vegas, NV, USA. 2016; Jun 27-30; pp. 770-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.90]
[22]
Yoon JH, Kim MJ, Lee HS. Validation of the fifth edition BI-RADS ultrasound lexicon with comparison of fourth and fifth edition diagnostic performance using video clips. Ultrasonography 2016; 35: 318- 26.
[23]
Chen P-H, Lin C-J, Schölkopf B. A tutorial on I1/2-support vector machines. Appl Stochastic Models Data Anal 2005; 21(2): 111-36.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asmb.537]
[24]
Simonyan K, Zisserman A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv 2014.

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
8
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy