Abstract
Background: Pancreatic cancer is mostly diagnosed in advanced stages, and treatment results are not satisfactory. L3 skeletal muscle index (SMI) has emerged as a prognostic factor in pancreatic cancer patients. We aimed to assess the association between sarcopenia and overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer in this study.
Methods: Patients who were admitted to the Department of Oncology between March 2012 and December 2019 and diagnosed with pancreatic cancer were evaluated. The computerized tomography images and laboratory parameters of a total of 115 patients were included in this retrospective singlecenter study. We defined sarcopenia as an SMI <43,56 cm²/m² for females and <56,44 cm²/m² for males using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve in the study population. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by using Cox-regression modelling, and survival curves were constructed by using Kaplan-Meier method.
Results: 70% of the patients were male, and the mean age was 64.9±9.9 years (mean ± SD). 70.6% of female patients and 67.9% of male patients were diagnosed with stage 4 cancer. The prevalence of sarcopenia in the whole patient group was 29.6%. By multivariate analysis, SMI (p=0.009) and advanced stage (p=0.003) were found as poor prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was statistically significantly higher in sarcopenic patients than in nonsarcopenic patients (p=0.031).
Conclusion: Patients having sarcopenia at the time of diagnosis may demonstrate poorer overall survival of pancreatic cancer, and SMI may be considered as a potential prognostic factor.
Keywords: Cancer, computed tomography, overall survival, pancreas, sarcopenia, skeletal muscle index.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdu138] [PMID: 24759568]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2014.12.002] [PMID: 25726048]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21254] [PMID: 25559415]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1011923] [PMID: 21561347]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-3067] [PMID: 17545532]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.56.1894] [PMID: 25422490]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afq034] [PMID: 20392703]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2418-6] [PMID: 25163434]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003697] [PMID: 24384894]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.701] [PMID: 24201751]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092079] [PMID: 24642859]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i9.2807] [PMID: 25759553]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2242] [PMID: 19351764]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0b013e328363bdf9] [PMID: 23924948]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.2011.02281.x] [PMID: 21418148]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2015.04.003] [PMID: 25974750]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1525] [PMID: 19887488]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.45.2722] [PMID: 23530101]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13651820701774891] [PMID: 18345294]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000000271] [PMID: 25423560]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2009.06.017] [PMID: 19732719]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10456-011-9207-3] [PMID: 21442180]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-3216] [PMID: 22510350]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181cda097] [PMID: 20216081]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nutr.012809.104817] [PMID: 20373917]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2015.08.005] [PMID: 26411749]