Abstract
Background: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a chronic and prevalent neurodegenerative disease that leads to memory loss, especially in the elderly. AD is caused by a lack of acetylcholine in the brain and oxidative stress. The Cyamopsis tetragonoloba, also known as Guar or cluster bean, is a legume that belongs to the family Fabaceae. It is cheap, widely consumed as a seasoned vegetable, and reported to counteract chronic diseases linked to oxidative stress, such as diabetes, dyslipidemia, inflammation, and ulcer.
Objective: The present study was undertaken to assess the anti-alzheimer’s activity of a tender green pod extract of Cyamopsis tetragonoloba on learning and memory impairment induced by scopolamine.
Methods: The extract's total phenolic and flavonoid content was determined using a UV-visible spectrophotometer. The Cyamopsis tetragonoloba methanolic pod extract (CTMPE) at a dose of 100 and 200 mg/kg and donepezil 2.5 mg/kg was administered orally for 7 successive days. On the seventh day, a single intraperitoneal injection of scopolamine was used to induce dementia. The behavioral experiments included an elevated plus maze, step-through passive avoidance, radial arm maze, and Y-maze tests were conducted. The mice were sacrificed and acetylcholine, acetylcholinesterase, and oxidative stress markers were measured in brain homogenate.
Results: The total phenolic and flavonoid content was found as 12.9 mg of GAE/g and 1.71 mg of QE/g, respectively. Scopolamine caused memory deterioration, as well as changes in acetylcholine, acetylcholinesterase, and increased oxidative stress in the brain. Mice pretreatment with CTMPE at both doses attenuated scopolamine-induced behavioral, neurochemical, and oxidative changes in a similar way to donepezil.
Conclusion: The CTMPE showed an anti-amnesic effect that makes it a promising candidate targeting multiple events as a potential strategy to curb the progression of cognitive impairment.
Keywords: Amnesia, anti-Alzheimer’s, cyamopsis tetragonoloba, scopolamine, donepezil, antioxidant.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/121.4.611] [PMID: 9577389]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.06.022] [PMID: 27343850]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0197-4580(98)00052-9] [PMID: 9661992]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2016.04.005] [PMID: 27108053]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2161-0460.1000116]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pharep.2015.07.006] [PMID: 26721364]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1423-0127-18-8] [PMID: 21251245]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00153-2] [PMID: 26213339]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.180.2.135] [PMID: 11823323]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573401315666181130103456]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-160763] [PMID: 27662322]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/mol.53.3.555] [PMID: 9495824]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/hta16210] [PMID: 22541366]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1992.tb10990.x] [PMID: 1402908]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-161088] [PMID: 28059794]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-014-0169-0] [PMID: 25179671]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1871527319666200214104331]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2011.11.050] [PMID: 22173129]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2016.06.010] [PMID: 27346436]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-014-3728-6] [PMID: 25189792]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/E-EPCS-120010422]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12892-009-0106-8]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5530/pj.2016.5.2]
[PMID: 15623233]
[PMID: 3666887]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.06.066]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2004.01.011] [PMID: 15099845]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13880209409082988]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(99)99017-1]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-015-0820-3] [PMID: 26283543]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2014.05.003] [PMID: 24836869]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1254/jphs.93.129] [PMID: 14578579]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2012.02.002] [PMID: 22402245]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-015-0864-4] [PMID: 26400617]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/znc-2005-11-1220] [PMID: 16402558]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-2952(61)90145-9] [PMID: 13726518]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6] [PMID: 14907713]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1968.tb00428.x] [PMID: 4387188]
[PMID: 6490072]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(59)90090-6] [PMID: 13650640]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1570159X13666150716165726] [PMID: 26813123]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1567205012666150701103107] [PMID: 26412218]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1479262107672335]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2012.08.015] [PMID: 22971592]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22010107] [PMID: 33374338]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1389557516666161130100947] [PMID: 27903226]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13596-019-00393-x]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113278] [PMID: 33662757]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2020.601603] [PMID: 33192493]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.238714] [PMID: 30136699]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom10010059] [PMID: 31905923]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbt.22319] [PMID: 30897277]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2019.00197] [PMID: 31620438]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/0929867324666170705123509] [PMID: 28685687]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35067589] [PMID: 11283752]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573401313666170427123623]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.11.037] [PMID: 17222983]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2006.09.035] [PMID: 17101250]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4401528] [PMID: 15592360]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2017.09.008] [PMID: 29157831]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.02.016] [PMID: 18348871]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19020363] [PMID: 29370115]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.09.022] [PMID: 15708432]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/157015909787602823] [PMID: 19721819]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2015.07.025] [PMID: 26349970]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjpp-2013-0082] [PMID: 24144053]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19390211.2016.1207002] [PMID: 27486053]