Abstract
Background: An accurate measurement of the target volume is of primary importance in theragnostics of hyperthyroidism.
Objective: Our purpose was to evaluate the accuracy of a threshold-based isocontour extraction procedure for thyroid tissue volumetry from SPECT-CT.
Methods: Cylindrical vials with a fixed volume of 99mTcO4 at different activities were inserted into a neck phantom in two different thickness settings. Images were acquired by orienting the phantom in different positions, i.e., 40 planar images and 40 SPECT-CT. The fixed values of the isocontouring threshold for SPECT and SPECT-CT were calculated by means of linear and spline regression models. Mean, Median, Standard Deviation, Standard Error, Mean Absolute Percentage Error and Root Mean-Square Error were computed. Any difference between the planar method, SPECT and SPECT-CT and the effective volume was evaluated by means of ANOVA and posthoc tests. Moreover, planar and SPECT-CT acquisitions were performed in 8 patients with hyperthyroidism, considering relevant percentage differences greater than > 20% from the CT gold standard.
Results: Concerning phantom studies, the planar method shows higher values of each parameter than the other two methods. SPECT-CT shows lower variability. However, no significant differences were observed between SPECT and SPECT-CT measurements. In patients, relevant differences were found in 7 out of 9 lesions with the planar method, in 6 lesions with SPECT, but in only one with SPECT-CT.
Conclusion: Our study confirms the superiority of SPECT in volume measurement if compared with the planar method. A more accurate measurement can be obtained from SPECT-CT.
Keywords: Thyroid, hyperthyroidism, thyroid tissue volumetry, SPECT, SPECT-CT, theragnostics.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.07.002] [PMID: 31323482]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jum.14316] [PMID: 28736947]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/105072504322880346] [PMID: 15068625]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2019.101312] [PMID: 31477522]
[PMID: 8708788]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.1567270] [PMID: 12772986]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_43_20] [PMID: 34040314]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006231-200307000-00002] [PMID: 12813191]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-002-1101-1] [PMID: 12541136]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4204-z] [PMID: 30402792]
[PMID: 10568133]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-002-0811-8] [PMID: 12192542]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39156-9]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-013-2387-x] [PMID: 23576099]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.02.013] [PMID: 24768486]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0b013e318286bbda] [PMID: 23531770]
[PMID: 18905884]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02841867809127693] [PMID: 696403]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00251989] [PMID: 3490983]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000003086] [PMID: 32433165]