Abstract
Background: Demand for alcohol-based products, including gel- and aqueous-type hand sanitizers, room sprays, and mouthwashes, has rapidly increased during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic because of their microbicidal properties. However, toxic methanol can be found from the intentional addition of methanol by manufacturers and invariable production during the manufacturing of alcohol (ethanol). Although the FDA has recommended that such products should contain less than 630 ppm of methanol, it is only a temporary measure established specifically to regulate such products during the current COVID-19 pandemic and hence is not strictly regulated.
Objective: This study aims to detect and quantify the level of methanol in alcohol-based products. However, some manufacturers unethically add methanol to their products and promote them as methanol-free. Besides, they do not provide proficiency and toxicity test results. Therefore, these kinds of products need to be analyzed to determine if they are acceptable to use.
Methods: This study qualitatively and quantitatively investigates the amount of methanol in commercial alcohol-based products using a newly developed headspace gas chromatography/mass spectrometry method. Moreover, alcoholic beverages which contain methanol are analyzed to be compared with the levels of methanol in alcohol-based products and determine if their methanol levels are acceptable.
Results: Methanol concentrations in gel-type hand sanitizers (517 ppm) and mouthwashes (202 ppm) were similar to those in white wine (429 ppm) and beer (256 ppm), respectively, while that of aqueous-type hand sanitizers (1139 ppm) was 1.5 times more than that of red wine (751 ppm).
Conclusion: Methanol levels in most of the alcohol-based products did not exceed the FDArecommended limit.
Keywords: Methanol, hand-sanitizer, headspace gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, COVID-19, alcohol-based products, ethanol.
Graphical Abstract
[1]
Hao, L.T.; Lee, M.; Jeon, H.; Koo, J.M.; Hwang, S.Y.; Oh, D.X.; Park, J. Tamper-proof time-temperature indicatior for inspecting ultracold supply chain. ACS Omega, 2021, 6(12), 8598-8604.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c00404] [PMID: 33817520]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c00404] [PMID: 33817520]
[2]
WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care; World Health Organization, 2009. Available from: www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241597906
[3]
FDA. Q&A for consumers, hand sanitizers and COVID-19 2021. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/information-drugclass/qa-consumers-hand-sanitizers-and-covid-19#:~:text=A%3A%20Hand%20sanitizers%20labeled%20as,isopropanol%20or%202% 2Dpropanol.
[4]
Berardi, A.; Perinelli, D.R.; Merchant, H.A.; Bisharat, L.; Basheti, I.A.; Bonacucina, G.; Cespi, M.; Palmieri, G.F. Hand sanitisers amid COVID-19: A critical review of alcohol-based products on the market and formulation approaches to respond to increasing demand. Int. J. Pharm., 2020, 584, 119431.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119431] [PMID: 32461194]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119431] [PMID: 32461194]
[5]
Hakimi, A.A.; Armstrong, W.B. Hand sanitizer in a pandemic: Wrong formulations in the wrong hands. J. Emerg. Med., 2020, 59(5), 668-672.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.07.018] [PMID: 32921540]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.07.018] [PMID: 32921540]
[6]
Golin, A.P.; Choi, D.; Ghahary, A. Hand sanitizers: A review of ingredients, mechanisms of action, modes of delivery, and efficacy against coronaviruses. Am. J. Infect. Control, 2020, 48(9), 1062-1067.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2020.06.182] [PMID: 32565272]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2020.06.182] [PMID: 32565272]
[7]
Balkrishna, A.; Singh, K.; Singh, H.; Haldar, S.; Varshney, A.; Germi, X.; Germi, X. A skin friendly hand sanitizer with prolonged effectivity against pathogenic bacteria. AMB Express, 2020, 10(1), 210.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13568-020-01151-y] [PMID: 33259026]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13568-020-01151-y] [PMID: 33259026]
[8]
Todd, E.C.; Michaels, B.S.; Holah, J.; Smith, D.; Greig, J.D.; Bartleson, C.A. Outbreaks where food workers have been implicated in the spread of foodborne disease. Part 10. Alcohol-based antiseptics for hand disinfection and a comparison of their effectiveness with soaps. J. Food Prot., 2010, 73(11), 2128-2140.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-73.11.2128] [PMID: 21219730]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-73.11.2128] [PMID: 21219730]
[9]
Jing, J.L.J.; Pei, Yi T.; Bose, R.J.C.; McCarthy, J.R.; Tharmalingam, N.; Madheswaran, T. Hand sanitizers: A review on formulation as-pects, adverse effects, and regulations. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2020, 17(9), E3326.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093326] [PMID: 32403261]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093326] [PMID: 32403261]
[10]
Parajuli, R.R. Multidisciplinary approach to COVID-19 risk communication: A framework and tool for individual and regional risk as-sessment. Scientific Rep, 2020, 4(1), 21650.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78779-0]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78779-0]
[11]
Sato, S.; Matsumoto, N.; Hisaie, K.; Uematsu, S. Alcohol abrogates human Norovirus infectivity in a pH-dependent manner. Sci. Rep., 2020, 10(1), 15878.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72609-z]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72609-z]
[12]
FDA. FDA warns consumers not to use Durisan antimicrobial Solutions recalled Hand Sanitizer alcohol-Free due to microbial contamina-tion., 2021. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-updates-hand-sanitizers-consumers-should-not-use
[13]
Arshad, M.; Hussain, T.; Iqbal, M.; Abbas, M. Enhanced ethanol production at commercial scale from molasses using high gravity tech-nology by mutant S. cerevisiae. Braz. J. Microbiol., 2017, 48(3), 403-409.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2017.02.003] [PMID: 28279601]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2017.02.003] [PMID: 28279601]
[14]
Moorer, W.R. Antiviral activity of alcohol for surface disinfection. Int. J. Dent. Hyg., 2003, 1(3), 138-142.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1601-5037.2003.00032.x] [PMID: 16451513]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1601-5037.2003.00032.x] [PMID: 16451513]
[15]
Skrzydlewska, E. Toxicological and metabolic consequences of methanol poisoning. Toxicol. Mech. Methods, 2003, 13(4), 277-293.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713857189] [PMID: 20021153]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713857189] [PMID: 20021153]
[16]
Chan, A.P.L.; Chan, T.Y.K. Methanol as an Unlisted ingredient in supposedly alcohol-based hand rub can pose serious health risk. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2018, 15(7), E1440.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071440] [PMID: 29987197]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071440] [PMID: 29987197]
[17]
Güntner, A.T.; Magro, L.; van den Broek, J.; Pratsinis, S.E. Detecting methanol in hand sanitizers. iScience, 2021, 24(2), 102050.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102050] [PMID: 33537657]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102050] [PMID: 33537657]
[18]
U.S. Department of health and human services food and drug administration center for drug evaluation and research (CDER). Temporary policy for preparation of certain alcohol-based hand sanitizer products during the public health emergency (COVID-19) guidance for industry. 2021.
[19]
Welke, J.E.; Zanus, M.; Lazzarotto, M.; Zini, C.A. Quantitative analysis of headspace volitaile compounds using comprehensive two di-mensional gas chromatography and their contribution to the aroma of Chardonnay wine. Food Res. Int., 2014, 59, 85-99.
[20]
Lee, C.; Lee, Y.; Lee, J.G.; Buglass, A.J. Development of a reduced pressure headspace solid phase micro extraction gas chromatography mass spectrometric (rpHSSPME-GC/MS) method and application to aroma analysis. Anal. Methods, 2015, 16(7), 6504-6513.
[21]
LeBouf, R.F.; Burns, D.A.; Ranpara, A.; Attfield, K.; Zwack, L.; Stefaniak, A.B. Headspace analysis for screening of volatile organic com-pound profiles of electronic juice bulk material. Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2018, 410(23), 5951-5960.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-1215-3] [PMID: 29974153]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-1215-3] [PMID: 29974153]
[22]
Cameleyre, M.; Lytra, G.; Barbe, J.C. Static headspace analysis using low-pressure gas chromatography and mass spectrometry, applica-tion to determining multiple partition coefficients: A practical tool for understanding red wine fruity volatile perception and the sensory impact of higher alcohols. Anal. Chem., 2018, 90(18), 10812-10818.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b01896]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b01896]
[23]
Jeleń H.; Gracka, A.; Myśków, B. Static headspace extraction with compounds trapping for the analysis of volatile lipid oxidation prod-ucts. Food Anal. Methods, 2017, 10, 2729-2734.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12161-017-0838-x]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12161-017-0838-x]
[24]
Farag, M.A. Headspace analysis of volatile compounds in leaves from the Juglandaceae (walnut) family. J. Essent. Oil Res., 2008, 20(4), 323-327.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2008.9700023]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2008.9700023]
[25]
Kusano, M.; Kobayashi, M.; Iizuka, Y.; Fukushima, A.; Saito, K. Unbiased profiling of volatile organic compounds in the headspace of Allium plants using an in-tube extraction device. BMC Res. Notes, 2016, 9(133), 133.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1942-5] [PMID: 26928722]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1942-5] [PMID: 26928722]
[26]
Eilers, E.J.; Kleine, S.; Eckert, S.; Waldherr, S.; Muller, C. Flower production, headspace volatiles, pollen nutritients, and florivory in Tanacetum vulgare Chemotypes. Front. Plant Sci, 2020, 11, 611877.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.611877]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.611877]
[27]
Lin, J.; Shi, Y.; Dong, C.; Wang, X. Headspace volatiles influenced by infusion matrix and their release persistence: a case study of oolong tea. Food Sci. Biotechnol., 2019, 28(5), 1349-1358.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10068-019-00587-8] [PMID: 31695933]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10068-019-00587-8] [PMID: 31695933]
[28]
Rafson, J.P.; Bee, M.Y.; Sacks, G.L. Spatially resolved headpsace extractions of trace-level volatiles from planar surfaces for hight throughoutput quantitation and mass spectral imaging. J. Agric. Food Chem., 2019, 67(50), 13840-13847.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.9b01091] [PMID: 30945545]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.9b01091] [PMID: 30945545]
[29]
Appley, M.G.; Beyramysoltan, S.; Musah, R.A. Random forest processing of direct analysis in real-time mass spectrometric data enables species identifaction of psychoactive plants from their headspace chemical signatures. ACS Omega, 2019, 4(13), 15636-15644.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b02145] [PMID: 31572865]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b02145] [PMID: 31572865]
[30]
Shinde, A.; Ormond, R.B. Development of a headpsace sampling gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method for the anlaysis of fire-ground contaminants on firefighter turnout materials. ACS Chem. Healt. Safety, 2020, 27(6), 352-361.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chas.0c00041]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chas.0c00041]
[31]
Volatile Organic Compounds, E.P.A. Various Sample Matrices Using Equilibrium Headspace Analysis; United States Enviromental Protec-tion Agency, 2014.
[32]
Scientific Working Group for forensic toxicology (SWGTOX) standard practices for method validation in forensic toxicology; SWGTOX, 2013, p. 1.
[33]
Whitaker, D.; Oliver, K.; Shelow, D.; Turner, D.; MacGregor, I. Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air Collected in Specially Prepared Canisters and Analyzed by Gas Chromatography– Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS), in: Method TO-15A, EPA. 2019.
[34]
Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Standard data. https://www.foodsafetykorea.go.kr/portal/healthyfoodlife/alBase.do (Accessed March 9, 2021).
Article Metrics
27
1