Abstract
Background: Late preterm infants suffer from several problems after birth, and the key factor in fighting these problems is effective breastfeeding.
Objective: To determine breastfeeding self-efficacy and its relationship with perceived stress and assess breastfeeding performance in mothers with late preterm infants.
Methods: In this prospective study, 171 eligible nursing mothers with late preterm infants born in Alzahra Medical Center of Tabriz, Iran, were selected via convenience sampling. The Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form was employed to measure breastfeeding self-efficacy, and the 14-item Perceived Stress Scale was used to measure the perceived stress 24 hours after giving birth. When the child was 4 months old, breastfeeding performance was measured by the Standard Breastfeeding Performance Questionnaire. The data were analyzed by Pearson and Spearman’s correlation tests, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, and multiple linear regression analysis.
Results: The mean (standard deviation) of breastfeeding self-efficacy was 50.0 (7.8) with scores ranging from 13 to 65, and the mean (standard deviation) of perceived stress was 26.5 (8.8) with scores ranging from 0 to 56. The median (25-75 percentiles) of breastfeeding performance score equaled 2.0 (1.0 to 3.0) with scores ranging from 0 to 6. Based on multiple linear regression analysis and after adjusting the personal-social characteristics, by increasing the score of breastfeeding self-efficacy, perceived stress was significantly decreased (B=-0.1, 95 %CI=-0.3 to 0.0). However, there was no statistically significant relationship between breastfeeding self-efficacy and breastfeeding performance (p = 0.418).
Conclusion: Due to the possibility of adjusting breastfeeding self-efficacy and its role in mothers’ perceived stress, developing proper strategies seems to be essential for enhancing breastfeeding self-efficacy.
Keywords: Preterm infant, breastfeeding, self-efficacy, perceived stress, performance, Iran.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1775]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4242-8_7]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.13133] [PMID: 26192560]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802758] [PMID: 15314625]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-008-0440-3] [PMID: 19156508]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60820-4] [PMID: 22682464]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.14196/mjiri.31.78] [PMID: 29445706]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2017.035] [PMID: 29302576]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1571150] [PMID: 26788789]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/birt.12135] [PMID: 25294061]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12254] [PMID: 28646537]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.14229] [PMID: 29352489]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-S1-S12] [PMID: 23445639]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770150405] [PMID: 1496151]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0b013e31826090ac] [PMID: 22864005]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0722-7] [PMID: 27821185]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2014.12.005] [PMID: 25545453]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2018.01.005] [PMID: 29406289]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2136404] [PMID: 6668417]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4358-7-5] [PMID: 22524566]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.15296/ijwhr.2018.62]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.hnmj.27.1.27]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2019.0251] [PMID: 32503365]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12659] [PMID: 29676039]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.01.035] [PMID: 21316877]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03431-8] [PMID: 33238937]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2019.102532] [PMID: 31526969]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.12.014] [PMID: 30594613]