Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Nutrition & Food Science

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4013
ISSN (Online): 2212-3881

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

Radiological Risks Assessment Due to Natural Radioactivity in Mediterranean Sea Fishes

Author(s): F. Caridi* and G. Belmusto

Volume 18, Issue 1, 2022

Published on: 08 September, 2021

Page: [69 - 74] Pages: 6

DOI: 10.2174/1573401317666210908163356

Price: $65

conference banner
Abstract

Background and Objectives: A comprehensive study was carried out for the determination of natural radioactivity in Mediterranean sea fishes and the evaluation of radiological health risks due to their ingestion. All analyzed samples came from the Calabria region, southern Italy, and, in particular, from the district of Reggio Calabria.

Method: A total of seventy representative samples, five for each investigated species (Sardina Pilchardus, Mugil Cephalus, Scomber Scombrus, Sparus Aurata, Dicentrarchus Labrax, Tonnus Thynnus, Thunnus Alalunga, Xiphaias Gladius, Pagellus Erythrinnus, Engraulis Encrasicholus, Belone Belone, Solea Solea, Merluccius Merluccius, Mullus Surmuletus) were analyzed through HPGe gamma spectrometry. The evaluation of dose levels and lifetime cancer risks for adult members of the population due to the fishes ingestion was also performed.

Results: The specific activity of 40K was investigated and its mean value was found to be: (157 ± 17) for Sardina Pilchardus, (138 ± 14) for Mugil Cephalus, (118 ± 13) for Scomber Scombrus, (128 ± 14) for Sparus Aurata, (146 ± 17) for Dicentrarchus Labrax, (93 ± 11) for Tonnus Thynnus, (137 ± 15) for Thunnus Alalunga, (98 ± 10) for Xiphaias Gladius, (105 ± 12) for Pagellus Erythrinnus, (132 ± 14) for Engraulis Encrasicholus, (113 ± 12) for Belone Belone, (34 ± 5) for Solea Solea, (76 ± 9) for Merluccius Merluccius and (96 ± 11) for Mullus Surmuletus, respectively.

Conclusion: The committed effective dose and the lifetime cancer risks for adult members of the population due to the consumption of the investigated samples are lower than the average world value, the maximum acceptable level and the allowed range, respectively. It can then be concluded that the Mediterranean sea fishes consumed in the study area pose no significant health risks to the population from a radiological point of view.

Keywords: Mediterranean sea fishes, natural radioactivity, radiological risk, committed effective dose, cancer risk, gammaspectrometry.

« Previous Next »
Graphical Abstract

[1]
Eisenbud M. Environmental radioactivity. USA: Academic Press 1987.
[2]
Madruga MJ. Environmental radioactivity monitoring in Portugal. Appl Radiat Isot 2008; 66(11): 1639-43.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.04.008] [PMID: 18501617]
[3]
Giri S, Singh G, Jha VN, Tripathi RM. Natural radionuclides in fish species from surface water of Bagjata and Banduhurang uranium mining areas, East Singhbhum, Jharkhand, India. Int J Radiat Biol 2010; 86(11): 946-56.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09553002.2010.492490] [PMID: 20670110]
[4]
Sam A, Eriksson A. Radium-226 uptake by vegetation grown in western Sudan. J Environ Radioact 1995; 29(1): 27-38.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0265-931X(95)90935-R]]
[5]
F. Caridi , M. D’Agostino , A. Belvedere , S. Marguccio , G. Belmusto , M.F. Gatto . Diagnostics techniques and dosimetric evaluations for environmental radioactivity investigations. J Instrum 2016; 11(10)C10012
[6]
Caridi F, D’Agostino M, Messina M, et al. Lichens as environmental risk detectors. Eur Phys J Plus 2017; 132: 189.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2017-11459-y]
[7]
Caridi F, D’Agostino M, Belvedere A, Marguccio S, Belmusto G. Radon radioactivity in groundwater from the Calabria region, south of Italy. J Instrum 2016; 11(5)
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/11/05/P05012]
[8]
Tzortzis M, Tsertos H, Christofides S, Christodoulides G. Gamma-ray measurements of naturally occurring radioactive samples from Cyprus characteristic geological rocks. Radiat Meas 2003; 37(3): 221-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(03)00028-3]
[9]
Caridi F, Messina M, Belvedere A, et al. Food salt characterization in terms of radioactivity and metals contamination. Appl Sci (Basel) 2019; 9: 2882.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app9142882]
[10]
Caridi F, Messina M, D’Agostino M. An investigation about natural radioactivity, hydrochemistry, and metal pollution in groundwater from Calabrian selected areas, southern Italy. Environ Earth Sci 2017; 76: 668.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-7031-9]
[11]
Ademola JA, Ehiedu SI. Radiological analysis of 40K, 226Ra and 232Th in fish, Crustacean and sediment samples from fresh and marine water in oil exploration area of Ondo state, Nigeria. Afr J Biomed Res 2010; 13: 99-106.
[12]
Aswood MS, Al-Hamzawi AA, Khadayeir AA. Natural radionuclides in six selected fish consumed in south Iraq and their committed effective doses. SN Appl Scie 2019; 1(1): 21.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42452-018-0019-6]
[13]
Adamu R, Zakari YI, Ahmed AY. Analysis of activity concentrations due to natural radionuclides in the fish of Kainji lake. Adv Appl Sci Res 2013; 4(4): 283-7.
[14]
Caridi F, Marguccio S, Belvedere A, D’Agostino M, Belmusto G. The natural radioactivity in food: a comparison between different feeding regimes. Curr Nutr Food Sci 2019; 15(5): 493-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874609811666180223155529]
[15]
Ramachandran TV, Mishra UC. Measurement of natural radioactivity levels in Indian foodstuffs by gamma spectrometry. Int J Rad Appl Instrum [A] 1989; 40(8): 723-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0883-2889(89)90085-3] [PMID: 2548981]
[16]
Mlwilo NA, Mohammed NK, Spyrou NM. Radioactivity levels of staple foodstuffs and dose estimates for most of the Tanzanian population. J Radiol Prot 2007; 27(4): 471-80.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/27/4/008] [PMID: 18268378]
[17]
ISPRA RESORAD Network Manual 2016.
[18]
Caridi F, D’Agostino M, Belvedere A. Radioactivity in Calabrian (Southern Italy) wild boar meat. Appl Sci (Basel) 2020; 10: 3580.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app10103580]
[19]
Advanced Gamma-Spectrometry Software Efficiency calculations for semiconductor and scintillation detectors Angle user guide 2018. Available from: https://www.ortec-online.com/-/media/ametekortec/manuals/angle-mnl.pdf?la=en&revision=735a4dc6-825e-4162-b8c2-79309ec76842
[20]
Ortec Gamma Vision-32 v. 8.0. 2017 Available from: https://www.ortec-online.com/-/media/ametekortec/manuals/a66-mnl.pdf
[21]
Italian Accreditation Body (ACCREDIA). 2019. Available from: https://www.accredia.it/
[22]
Billa J, Han F, Didla S, et al. Radioactivity studies on farm raised and wild catfish produced in Mississippi, USA. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 2016; 307(1): 203-10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10967-015-4159-5]
[23]
Jibiri NN, Isinkaye MO, Bello IA, Olaniyi PG. Dose assessments from the measured radioactivity in soil, rock, clay, sediment and food crop samples of an elevated radiation area in south-western Nigeria. Environ Earth Sci 2016; 75(2): 107.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4819-3]
[24]
2020. Available from: http://www.fao.org/fishery/facp/ITA/en
[25]
International Atomic Energy Agency. Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards, IAEA Safety Standards Series No GSR Part 3 (Interim), STI/PUB/1531. Vienna: IAEA 2011; pp. 190-219.
[26]
Annamalai SK, Arunachalam KD, Selvaraj R. Natural radionuclide dose and lifetime cancer risk due to ingestion of fish and water from fresh water reservoirs near the proposed uranium mining site. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2017; 24(18): 15427-43.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9111-5] [PMID: 28508337]
[27]
El-Gamal A, Nasr S, El-Taher A. Study of the spatial distribution of natural radioactivity in the upper Egypt Nile river sediments. Radiat Meas 2007; 42: 457-65.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2007.02.054]
[28]
UNSCEAR Sources and effects of ionizing radiationReport of the united nations scientific committee on the effects of atomic radiation to the general assembly. New York, USA: United Nations 2000.
[29]
ICRP. The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection (ICRP).ICRP publication 103,Ann. ICRP In: 2007.
[30]
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Risk assessment guidance for superfund, 1: human health evaluation manual. Washington, DC 1991. EPA/540 TR-92/003 Publication 9285.7-01B In:

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
16
2
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy