Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Women`s Health Reviews

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4048
ISSN (Online): 1875-6581

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Ectopic Pregnancies

Author(s): Fatimetou Abdelkader Hamad*, Nadia Lamiri, Wajih Abidi, Dekhra Trabelsi, Rim Ben Hmid and Radhouane Achour

Volume 18, Issue 4, 2022

Article ID: e261121195222 Pages: 5

DOI: 10.2174/1573404817666210803164110

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Ectopic pregnancy is the most common cause of death among women during the first trimester of pregnancy despite the progress made with early diagnosis. It occurs at a rate of 1 to 2% that of live births. In Mauritania, EP is a public health issue mostly affecting young women.

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic abilities and the management of EP.

Methods: This study is transverse descriptive and was carried out in the maternity of Nouakchott’s teaching hospital. The aim of this study was to provide data on the epidemiological profile, diagnosis, management and prognosis of ectopic pregnancy. During the period from May 2013 to April 2014, 44 cases of ectopic pregnancies were collected. The collected data were analysed by means of SPSS version 20, Microsoft Excel 2007.

Results: The incidence of EP was 0.99% coefficient to 1 EP per 100 live births. EP management represented 7.3% of emergency surgery. The average patient age was 29.84 ± 5.988 years. The most affected age group was 25-34 year olds (61.4%). Multigravida were more affected with a rate of 80%. Patients with an EP commonly presented with pelvic pain (91% of our patients), late in menstruation (86.3%), and vaginal bleeding (61.3%). Pelvic ultrasound was performed in 41 patients with a coefficient of 93%. The treatment was surgical by performing laparotomy in all of the cases. The surgical treatment was radical in 93.2%, salpingectomy was performed in 86.4% of the cases, while adnexectomy was performed in 6.8% of the cases. Conservative treatment was performed in 3 patients: 2 cases of salpingotomy and 1 case of tubal expression. In most cases, the postoperative evolution was simple.

Conclusion: Until this day, ectopic pregnancy is a severe disease. Despite the progress made in early diagnonsis, in many cases, the treatment is surgical with all its consequences and especially in the developing countries, including Mauritania. Improving the therapeutic management above all improves the diagnostic procedure in a very early period.

Keywords: Ectopic, pregnancy, diagnosis, management, prognosis, mauritania.

[1]
Randriambololona DMA, Anjaharisoaniaina NT, Rekoronirina EB, Harioly MO, Randriambelomanana JA, Andrianampanalinarivo RH. Grossesse extra-utérine à Madagascar: 107 observations. Med Sante Trop 2012; 22(4): 394-7.
[PMID: 23339863]
[2]
Nayama M, Gallais A, Ousmane N, et al. Prise en charge de la grossesse extra-utérine dans les pays en voie de développement: Exemple d’une maternité de référence au Niger. Gynécol Obstét Fertil 2006; 34(1): 14-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2005.11.001] [PMID: 16406661]
[3]
Menard J-P, Bretelle F, D’Ercole C, Boubli L. Place de la biologie parmi les stratégies diagnostiques de la grossesse extra-utérine. Immunol Anal Biol Spec 2011; 26: 13-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.immbio.2010.12.005]
[4]
Farquhar CM. Ectopic pregnancy. Lancet 2005; 366(9485): 583-91.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67103-6] [PMID: 16099295]
[5]
Stulberg DB, Cain LR, Dahlquist I, Lauderdale DS. Ectopic pregnancy rates and racial disparities in the Medicaid population, 2004-2008. Fertil Steril 2014; 102(6): 1671-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.08.031] [PMID: 25439806]
[6]
Gervaise A, Fernandez H. Prise en charge diagnostique et thérapeutique des grossesses extra-utérines. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2010; 39(3): F17-24.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jgyn.2010.02.013] [PMID: 20395072]
[7]
Benneto D, Rabischong TB, et al. Facteurs de risque de récidive des grossesses extra-utérines. J de Gynéco Obstét et Biologie de la Reprod 2012; 41: 55-61.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jgyn.2011.09.002]
[8]
Atri M, Valenti DA, Bret PM, Gillett P. Effect of transvaginal sonography on the use of invasive procedures for evaluating patients with a clinical diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound 2003; 31(1): 1-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcu.10131] [PMID: 12478646]
[9]
Bornstein E, Berg R, Santos R, Monteagudo A, Timor-Tritsch IE. Term singleton pregnancy after conservative management of a complicated triplet gestation including a heterotopic cornual monochorionic twin pair. J Ultrasound Med 2011; 30(6): 865-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7863/jum.2011.30.6.865] [PMID: 21633005]
[10]
Flores AH, et al. Frequency of utilisation of ultrasound in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy in sub-saharan africa countries: A systematic review. Afr J Emerg Med 2014; 2211-419.
[11]
Achour R, Ghades S, Neji K. Grossesse hétérotopique: à propos d’un cas et revue de la littérature. Imag Femme 2014; 24: 177-80.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.femme.2014.09.001]
[12]
Dimitry ES, Subak-Sharpe R, Mills M, Margara R, Winston R. Nine cases of heterotopic pregnancies in 4 years of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1990; 53(1): 107-10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)53225-7] [PMID: 2295328]
[13]
Ben Temime R, Mathlouthi N, et al. La grossesse hétérotopique: à propos de sept cas et revue de la littérature. Imag Femme 2012; 22: 110-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.femme.2012.04.008]
[14]
Frey C, Poncelet C. Traitement endoscopique de la grossesse extra-utérine. Gynécol Obstét Fertil 2011; 39(11): 640-3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2011.09.006] [PMID: 21996329]
[15]
van Mello NM, Mol F, Adriaanse AH, et al. The METEX study: Methotrexate versus expectant management in women with ectopic pregnancy: A randomised controlled trial. BMC Womens Health 2008; 8: 10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-8-10] [PMID: 18565217]
[16]
Sy T, Diallo Y, Toure A, et al. Prise en charge de la grossesse extra utérine à Conakry (Guinée). Med Trop (Mars) 2009; 69(6): 565-8.
[PMID: 20099670]
[17]
Canis M, Savary D, Pouly J-L, Wattiez A, Mage G. Grossesse extra-utérine: Criteres de choix du traitement médical ou du traitement chirurgical. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2003; 32(S7): 54-63.
[18]
Garbin O, DE Tayrac R. Traitement médical des grossesses extra-utérines : Un essai clinique randomisé comparant méthotrexate-mifépristone et placebo-méthotrexate. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2004; 33: 391-400.
[19]
Desroque D, Capmas P, Legendre G, Bouyer J, Fernandez H. Fertilité après grossesse extra-utérine. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2010; 39(5): 395-400.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jgyn.2010.04.002] [PMID: 20478667]
[20]
Lundorff P, Thorburn J, Lindblom B. Fertility outcome after conservative surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy evaluated in a randomized trial. Fertil Steril 1992; 57(5): 998-1002.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55015-8] [PMID: 1572493]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
22
1
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy