Abstract
Background: Cardiovascular diseases correspond to the highest risk of sudden death worldwide, and obesity is largely related to be an increased risk factor. There is a higher prevalence of arterial hypertension in obese individuals, including the presence of cardiac hypertrophy. It is already known the role of toll-like receptors [TLR], mainly 2 and 4 in heart cells, as fundamental to the process of cardiac hypertrophy. Obesity has been studied as an activator of damage-associated molecular patterns [DAMPs], which use the TLR signaling pathway to increase the nuclear factor of inflammation, NF-kB, increasing cytokine expression in heart tissue. It’s already known that FVB/N and C57BL/6 mouse strains have different behaviors in relation to metabolism, but the difference in cardiac tropism and innate immune system modulation are not clear.
Methods: The present study aimed to evaluate the contribution of innate immune factors to cardiac hypertrophy induced by an experimental model of obesity comparing two mouse strains: C57BL/6 and FVB/N. Both strains were submitted to a high-fat diet containing 23% protein, 35.5% carbohydrate, and 35.9% fat for 68 days. Hearts were collected, weighed, and submitted to RT-qPCR, and the serum was analyzed by Bioplex.
Results: We observed an increase in heart mass after 68 days in both strains. This was followed by an increase of α-actin only in C57BL/6 while ANF was increased in FVB/N. Gene expression of innate immune components and inflammatory cytokines were only increased in C57BL/6, but not in FVB/N.
Conclusion: Based on the results obtained, we verified that C57BL/6 mice had a more robust action of innate immune system then FVB/N.
Keywords: Cardiac hypertrophy, obesity, high-fat diet, immune response, TLR, C57BL/6, FVB/N.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.20396/conex.v8i3.8637727]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2017.05.013] [PMID: 28532816]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1566524033479735] [PMID: 12776988]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10528-016-9751-z] [PMID: 27313173]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-52732006000100009]
[PMID: 11273255]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2016.209] [PMID: 28053336]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2008.01.006] [PMID: 18304834]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139350] [PMID: 26448184]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ars.2016.6746] [PMID: 27225042]
[PMID: 8044192]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.14129] [PMID: 30648807]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13271] [PMID: 28483861]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2003000700004] [PMID: 12886433]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2015.04.010] [PMID: 25982698]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000212758] [PMID: 19365105]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nri2921] [PMID: 21252989]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2119/2007-00119.Tilg] [PMID: 18235842]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/39335] [PMID: 9335502]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141126] [PMID: 12524386]