Abstract
Background: Fluorine containing hexahydroquinoline-3-carbonitrile derivatives were found to have potent cytotoxicity. Furthermore, fluorine can modulate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of drugs. Hence, new derivatives containing fluorine were explored as potential cytotoxic agents.
Objective: Difluoro substituted compounds containing aromatic/heteroaromatic rings were designed, synthesized and screened for in vitro cytotoxicity on cancer cell lines. The active compounds were subjected to docking on Mcl-1 and ADME/T prediction.
Methods: The synthesized compounds were characterized using various spectral techniques like FT-IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR and Mass spectra. Compounds were screened for cytotoxicity on NCI-60 cell lines at the National Cancer Institute. The active compounds were evaluated additionally by MTT and SRB assay.
Results: Compounds (6l and 6o) showed maximum cytotoxicity with (% GI) of 69 and 63.7 at 10 μM drug concentration, respectively. Compound 6i showed potent cytotoxicity with GI50 of 7.2 μM against Ishikawa cell line. Compound 6o was nearly as active as a reference with IC50 of 9.39 μM and 13.54 μM against HT-29 and HCT-116, respectively, and compound 6l also showed equal potency to that of reference with IC50 of 9.66 μM against Caco-2. Compounds 6i, 6o and 6l showed high docking scores, suggesting their cytotoxicity. Furthermore, ADME/T prediction revealed that all the compounds had drug-likeness properties.
Conclusion: Enhanced lipophilic interaction of compounds due to the presence of fluorine in compounds 6i and 6l was revealed during the docking study. Compound 6i can be explored as a lead molecule against other endometrial cancer in futuristic drug development.
Keywords: Hexahydroquinoline-3-carbonitrile derivatives, cytotoxicity, NCI-60 cell lines, MTT assay, docking, venetoclax, imatinib.
Graphical Abstract
[PMID: 24349827]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1711_18] [PMID: 30665997]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.10.065] [PMID: 19879135]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12272-012-0803-6] [PMID: 22941476]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jhet.749]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00044-012-0272-y]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ardp.201000010] [PMID: 21290425]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00044-012-0031-0]
[PMID: 29474771]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00044-011-9693-2]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14756366.2014.960864] [PMID: 25265324]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C7NJ01962A]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2013.03.017] [PMID: 23567957]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00044-017-1850-9]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00044-010-9332-3]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2009.05.017] [PMID: 19540022]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.03.030] [PMID: 20413187]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cbic.200301023] [PMID: 15122635]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/82.13.1107] [PMID: 2359136]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ptr.5580] [PMID: 26814058]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.329] [PMID: 20066663]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep42717]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1602/neurorx.2.4.541] [PMID: 16489364]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2016.253] [PMID: 28209992]