Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Nutrition & Food Science

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4013
ISSN (Online): 2212-3881

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

Effect of Flour Extraction Rate on the Sensory Evaluation of Iraqi Flatbread

Author(s): Abeer S. Alhendi*, Dhafer Z. Al-Shalchi, Rana T. Alsallami and Zahraa S. Alobaidy

Volume 17, Issue 2, 2021

Published on: 30 May, 2020

Page: [204 - 209] Pages: 6

DOI: 10.2174/1573401316999200530213123

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Increasing cereal fiber consumption is a trend worldwide nowadays because of the health benefits of fiber. Increasing the flour extraction rate is a way to increase fiber consumption.

Methods: Three high extraction rate flours were produced (80%, 85%, and 92%) to make Iraqi flatbread. The produced flour was obtained from a big scale technical mill (10 tons/h, Altaji mill) by changing roll adjustment or merging bran output with the flour from the production line. The bread samples were evaluated for sensory acceptability using 9-points hedonic scale for palatability, flavor, and freshness, and using the just-about-right scale for color and texture attributes for three sequencing days.

Results: Significant differences for palatability, color, and flavor attributes between slices of bread produced from 80% and 92% extraction rates flours were observed. There were no significant differences between the treatments for other attributes for the first day. On the second day, there were significant differences in color attribute between 92% extraction rate flour and other treatments. While the third day, there were no significant differences between the treatments for all attributes. The results also indicated that there were no significant differences in the studied attributes within the same treatment on different days.

Conclusion: Iraqi consumers preferred bread prepared from lower extraction rates compared to higher, and it is mostly because of the color factor.

Keywords: Bran, bread acceptability, extraction rate, flatbread, hedonic scale, just-about-right scale.

« Previous Next »
Graphical Abstract

[1]
Shewry PR, Halford NG, Belton PS, et al. The structure and properties of gluten: an elastic protein from wheat grain. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2002; 357(1418): 133-42.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2001.1024] [PMID: 11911770]
[2]
Belderok B, Mesdag J, Mesdag H, et al. Bread-making quality of wheat: a century of breeding in Europe Springer Netherlands. 2000.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0950-7]
[3]
Šramková Z, Gregová E, Šturdík E. Chemical composition and nutritional quality of wheat grain. Acta Chim Slov 2009; 2(1): 115-38.
[4]
Cornell HJ. The chemistry and biochemistry of wheat. In: Cauvain SP, Ed.Breadmaking. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing 2012; pp. 35-76.
[5]
Noort MW, van Haaster D, Hemery Y, et al. The effect of particle size of wheat bran fractions on bread quality-evidence for fibre-protein interactions. J Cereal Sci 2010; 52(1): 59-64.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2010.03.003]
[6]
Shewry PR, Hey SJ. The contribution of wheat to human diet and health. Food Energy Secur 2015; 4(3): 178-202.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fes3.64] [PMID: 27610232]
[7]
Al‐Dmoor HM. Flatbread: ingredients and fortification. Qual Assur Saf Crops Foods 2012; 4(1): 2-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-837X.2011.00121.x]
[8]
Alhendi A, Almukhtar BQ, Al-haddad FM. Changes in flour quality of four Iraqi wheat varieties during storage. Pertanika, J Trop Agric Sci 2019; 42(1): 15-25.
[9]
Posner ES, Deyoe CW. Changes in milling properties of newly harvested hard wheat during storage. Cereal Chem 1986; 63(5): 451-6.
[10]
Hassan EG, Mustafa AMI, Elfaki AA. Effect of different starches on dough rheological properties of wheat flour. J Agri-Food App Sci 2015; 3(4): 110-7.
[11]
Hemdane S, Jacobs PJ, Dornez E, Verspreet J, Delcour JA, Courtin CM. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) bran in bread making: a critical review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2016; 15(1): 28-42.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12176]
[12]
Methods AACC. Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists 10th ed American Association of Cereal Chemists St Paul, MN, USA. 2000.
[13]
Standards ICC. Standard Methods of the International Association for Cereal Science and Technology International Association for Cereal Science and Technology Vienna, Austria. 1996.
[14]
Annett LE, Muralidharan V, Boxall PC, et al. Influence of health and environmental information on hedonic evaluation of organic and conventional bread. J Food Sci 2008; 73(4): H50-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00723.x] [PMID: 18460130]
[15]
Alhendi A, Yang W, Goodrich‐Schneider R, et al. Sensory evaluation and flavour analysis of soymilk produced from lipoxygenase‐free soya beans after modified processes and pulsed light treatment. Int J Food Sci Technol 2018; 53(6): 1434-41.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.13721]
[16]
Azizi MH, Seyedin S, Peyghambardoust SH. Effect of flour extraction rate on flour composition, dough rheological characteristics and quality of flatbread. J Agric Sci Technol 2006; 8: 323-30.
[17]
Ramírez‐Wong B, Walker CE, Ledesma‐Osuna AI, et al. Cereal Chem 2007; 84(3): 207-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM-84-3-0207]
[18]
Mueen-ud-Din G, Rehman S, Anjum FM, et al. Effect of wheat flour extraction rates on flour composition, farinographic characteristics and sensory perception of sourdough naans. Int J Biol Biomol Agric Food Biotechnol Eng 2010; 4(8): 668-74.
[19]
Zhang D, Moore WR. Wheat bran particle size effects on bread baking performance and quality. J Sci Food Agric 1999; 79(6): 805-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(19990501)79:6<805:AID-JSFA285>3.0.CO;2-E]
[20]
Majzoobi M, Farahnaky A, Nematolahi Z, et al. Effect of different levels and particle sizes of wheat bran on the quality of flatbread. J Agric Sci Technol 2013; 15(1): 115-23.
[21]
Wang RW, Zhou W, Isabelle M. Comparison study of the effect of green tea extract (GTE) on the quality of bread by instrumental analysis and sensory evaluation. Food Res Int 2007; 40(4): 470-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2006.07.007]
[22]
Nicolas L, Marquilly C, O’Mahony M. The 9-point hedonic scale: are words and numbers compatible? Food Qual Prefer 2010; 21(8): 1008-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.05.017]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
13
1
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy