摘要
背景:临床证据表明,受阿尔茨海默氏病(AD)影响的患者尽管对旧事件的记忆完好无损,却无法形成新的记忆。这种记忆删除模式取决于对海马区AD神经神经变性的选择性脆弱性,该区域维持新记忆的形成的大脑区域,而存储远程记忆的皮质区域则被保留。 目的:确定AD小鼠模型中受损的近期记忆和完整的远程记忆的潜在细胞机制。 方法:通过膜片钳记录AD样Tg2576小鼠的急性海马和前扣带回皮层(aCC)切片以及经受情境恐惧条件(CFC)任务或处于幼稚条件下的野生型(Wt)同窝仔的谷氨酸能产生突触电流。 结果:我们在Tg2576小鼠中发现了最近记忆形成的缺陷,但没有发现远处记忆的缺陷。通过电生理学记录,我们在训练后一天检测到了Wt的CA1锥体细胞中CFC诱导的AMPA / NMDA比值的修饰,而Tg2576的小鼠中没有。训练后8天,在Wt和Tg2576小鼠的aCC中也检测到了CFC诱导的AMPA / NMDA比值的变化。 结论:我们的数据表明,在AD早期,CA1突触对形成新记忆至关重要的突触可塑性丧失,而aCC突触的可塑性却完好无损,并有助于长期记忆的持久性。
关键词: 阿尔茨海默氏病,近期记忆,远程记忆,海马,前扣带回皮层,突触可塑性,AMPA,NMDA。
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01688638908400928] [PMID: 2808661]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.01.002] [PMID: 23352159]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.04.018] [PMID: 19409401]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13803390591001043] [PMID: 16822732]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00308809] [PMID: 1759558]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.52.7.1397] [PMID: 10227624]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awp007] [PMID: 19251758]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.15.7041] [PMID: 8041742]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144130] [PMID: 15217334]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.183406] [PMID: 16882861]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2015.05.010] [PMID: 26106572]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2014.08.001] [PMID: 25132316]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2007.02.006] [PMID: 17336513]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0966-09.2009] [PMID: 19553460]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2015.05.003] [PMID: 26001597]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2018.02.011] [PMID: 29444449]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1016275108] [PMID: 21531906]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.3189] [PMID: 22885849]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1098180] [PMID: 15232109]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06951.x] [PMID: 19811531]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa5542] [PMID: 26023136]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/rns.2011.035] [PMID: 21732714]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0080-x] [PMID: 29403035]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.2709] [PMID: 21151119]
[PMID: 30528194]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.274.5284.99] [PMID: 8810256]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.09.017] [PMID: 19892321]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn1607] [PMID: 15685217]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physiol.64.092501.114547] [PMID: 11826273]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/23276] [PMID: 10458163]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-130923] [PMID: 23969995]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2015.07.001]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/963460] [PMID: 26175549]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-150722] [PMID: 26836162]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00033] [PMID: 23616754]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2004.06.005] [PMID: 15464402]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11028] [PMID: 22441246]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13725] [PMID: 25162525]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1128134] [PMID: 16931756]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1140263] [PMID: 17556551]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02752-1] [PMID: 29348512]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.794808] [PMID: 18391185]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1135801] [PMID: 17303747]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.05.001] [PMID: 21676499]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119910] [PMID: 25768013]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep20119] [PMID: 26818394]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601068] [PMID: 28275722]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2008.03.001] [PMID: 18442916]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn1301] [PMID: 14708003]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.01.015] [PMID: 19217372]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-6606-5-6] [PMID: 22304729]