Abstract
Background: The role of minerals in preventing the generation of oxidative stress in obese individuals has been evaluated. Magnesium is an antioxidant nutrient and a cofactor of enzymes involved in the cell membrane stabilization, attenuating the effects of oxidative stress.
Objective: To evaluate the association between magnesium and concentrations of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) in patients with obesity and eutrophic women.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 73 women, divided into two groups: case group (patients with obesity, n=27) and control group (eutrophic women, n=46). Measurements of body mass index and waist circumference were performed. Dietary magnesium intake was assessed by the three-day food record using the NutWin software. Urinary magnesium concentration was measured by atomic absorption spectrophotometry method. Plasma concentrations of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) were also determined.
Results: Mean values of dietary magnesium intake were 161.59 ± 60.04 and 158.73 ± 31.96 for patients with obesity and control group, respectively, with no significant difference between the groups studied (p >0.05). The value of urinary excretion of magnesium was lower than the reference values in both groups, with no significant difference between the groups studied (p >0.05). The plasma concentration of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances was significantly higher in patients with obesity compared to the control group (p <0.001). There was no correlation between levels of magnesium biomarkers and the concentration of TBARS (p >0.05).
Conclusion: Patients with obesity showed a reduced dietary magnesium intake which seems to induce hypomagnesuria as a compensatory mechanism. The marker of oxidative stress evaluated in this study was not influenced by magnesium.
Keywords: Biomarkers, magnesium, nutritional status, obesity, oxidative stress, women.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ars.2012.4875] [PMID: 22900819]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.63.02.156] [PMID: 28355377]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.63.03.229] [PMID: 28489128]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2359-3997000000227] [PMID: 27901184]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2014.05.011] [PMID: 25264334]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00012.2014] [PMID: 25540137]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12011-016-0793-1] [PMID: 27444303]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12011-016-0797-x] [PMID: 27406212]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.15373/22778179/MARCH2014/77]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114366]
[PMID: 1914186]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000456329803500401] [PMID: 9681049]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(79)90738-3] [PMID: 36810]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12011-015-0358-8] [PMID: 25982004]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12011-014-0044-2] [PMID: 24984789]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2016.12.012] [PMID: 27986549]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cmi.12336] [PMID: 25073615]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2014.12.018] [PMID: 25558793]