摘要
美国一项针对黑色素瘤,滑膜肉瘤和多发性骨髓瘤患者的在美国进行的第一阶段CRISPR基因编辑试验的前瞻性研究提供了希望,即基因编辑工具可以有效治疗人类疾病。然而,首先在人类第一阶段临床试验中,首要的伦理挑战是知道什么时候在从临床前研究获得的安全性和有效性数据的基础上启动此类试验在伦理上是可接受的。如果通知试验设计的临床前研究本身设计得不好,导致临床前证据的质量不足,那么对临床研究的科学有效性的伦理要求可能就不能满足。反过来,这可能意味着1期临床试验将是不安全的,试验参与者将面临无潜在风险的风险。为了帮助申办者,研究人员,临床研究者和审稿人决定什么时候在伦理上接受启动人类第一阶段CRISPR基因编辑临床试验,已经开发了结构化的过程来评估和最小化临床前和临床研究之间的翻译距离。这些过程引起人们对内部有效性,结构有效性和外部效度的各种特征的关注。支持性证据的可信度也需要特别注意乐观偏见,财务利益冲突和发表偏倚。我们批判性地研究了使用这些工具来验证美国第一阶段CRISPR基因编辑癌症试验的临床前证据。我们的结论是,所提出的试验不能满足科学有效性的伦理要求,因为用于通知试验设计的辅助临床前证据是有缺陷的。
关键词: CRISPR,第一阶段,癌症,基因编辑,研究伦理,科学有效性。
Current Gene Therapy
Title:First-in-human Phase 1 CRISPR Gene Editing Cancer Trials: Are We Ready?
Volume: 17 Issue: 4
关键词: CRISPR,第一阶段,癌症,基因编辑,研究伦理,科学有效性。
摘要: A prospective first-in-human Phase 1 CRISPR gene editing trial in the United States for patients with melanoma, synovial sarcoma, and multiple myeloma offers hope that gene editing tools may usefully treat human disease. An overarching ethical challenge with first-in-human Phase 1 clinical trials, however, is knowing when it is ethically acceptable to initiate such trials on the basis of safety and efficacy data obtained from pre-clinical studies. If the pre-clinical studies that inform trial design are themselves poorly designed – as a result of which the quality of pre-clinical evidence is deficient – then the ethical requirement of scientific validity for clinical research may not be satisfied. In turn, this could mean that the Phase 1 clinical trial will be unsafe and that trial participants will be exposed to risk for no potential benefit. To assist sponsors, researchers, clinical investigators and reviewers in deciding when it is ethically acceptable to initiate first-in-human Phase 1 CRISPR gene editing clinical trials, structured processes have been developed to assess and minimize translational distance between pre-clinical and clinical research. These processes draw attention to various features of internal validity, construct validity, and external validity. As well, the credibility of supporting evidence is to be critically assessed with particular attention to optimism bias, financial conflicts of interest and publication bias. We critically examine the pre-clinical evidence used to justify the first-inhuman Phase 1 CRISPR gene editing cancer trial in the United States using these tools.
We conclude that the proposed trial cannot satisfy the ethical requirement of scientific validity because the supporting pre-clinical evidence used to inform trial design is deficient.
Export Options
About this article
Cite this article as:
First-in-human Phase 1 CRISPR Gene Editing Cancer Trials: Are We Ready?, Current Gene Therapy 2017; 17 (4) . https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1566523217666171121165935
DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1566523217666171121165935 |
Print ISSN 1566-5232 |
Publisher Name Bentham Science Publisher |
Online ISSN 1875-5631 |
Call for Papers in Thematic Issues
Programmed Cell Death Genes in Oncology: Pioneering Therapeutic and Diagnostic Frontiers (BMS-CGT-2024-HT-45)
Programmed Cell Death (PCD) is recognized as a pivotal biological mechanism with far-reaching effects in the realm of cancer therapy. This complex process encompasses a variety of cell death modalities, including apoptosis, autophagic cell death, pyroptosis, and ferroptosis, each of which contributes to the intricate landscape of cancer development and ...read more
Related Journals
- Author Guidelines
- Graphical Abstracts
- Fabricating and Stating False Information
- Research Misconduct
- Post Publication Discussions and Corrections
- Publishing Ethics and Rectitude
- Increase Visibility of Your Article
- Archiving Policies
- Peer Review Workflow
- Order Your Article Before Print
- Promote Your Article
- Manuscript Transfer Facility
- Editorial Policies
- Allegations from Whistleblowers
- Announcements
Related Articles
-
Angiogenesis Inhibitors and Vascular Disrupting Agents in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Current Medicinal Chemistry Radionuclide Antibody-Conjugates, a Targeted Therapy Towards Cancer
Current Radiopharmaceuticals Material-Based Engineering Strategies for Cardiac Regeneration
Current Pharmaceutical Design Disease-Modifying Therapies in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration
Current Medicinal Chemistry Role of the Endosomal ESCRT Machinery in HIV-1 Vpu-Induced Down- Regulation of BST2/Tetherin
Current HIV Research Antibody-Drug Conjugate Targets
Current Cancer Drug Targets Quercetin in Cancer Treatment, Alone or in Combination with Conventional Therapeutics?
Current Medicinal Chemistry Review of Clinic Trials: Agents Targeting c-Met
Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials Alkylphospholipids are Signal Transduction Modulators with Potential for Anticancer Therapy
Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry Reversing Agents for ATP-Binding Cassette (ABC) Transporters: Application in Modulating Multidrug Resistance (MDR)
Current Medicinal Chemistry - Anti-Cancer Agents Oxidative Stress and Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Neurotrophic Approach
Current Drug Targets Inflammation and Age-Related Iron Accumulation in F344 Rats
Current Aging Science Vesicles: A Recently Developed Novel Carrier for Enhanced Topical Drug Delivery
Current Drug Delivery Targeting Focal Adhesion Kinase in Neuroblastoma
Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry A Natural Membrane Vesicle Exosome-based Sinomenine Delivery Platform for Hepatic Carcinoma Therapy
Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry Radiopharmaceutical Tracking of Particles Injected into Tumors: A Model to Study Clearance Kinetics
Current Drug Delivery Signaling Intermediates (MAPK and PI3K) as Therapeutic Targets in NSCLC
Current Pharmaceutical Design Breaking the Barrier of Cancer Through Liposome Loaded with Phytochemicals
Current Drug Delivery The Cancer Preventive Effects of Edible Mushrooms
Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry Emerging Breast Cancer Biomarkers
Current Cancer Therapy Reviews