Abstract
Background: Low-dose prasugrel (5 mg) has been proposed for patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) and advanced age or low body weight. However, the routine use of dose-adjusted prasugrel in this high-risk subset of patients is still debated.
Aim: This study aimed to assess the prevalence and predictors of HRPR among elderly patients treated with low-dose (5 mg) prasugrel to evaluate the routine use of dose-adjusted prasugrel in this high-risk subset of patients.
Methods: We included 59 elderly patients (≥75 years) treated with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT: acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 100-160 mg + prasugrel 5 mg) after Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (PCI) and undergoing platelet function assessment (by whole blood impedance aggregometry) 30-90 days post-discharge.
Results: At a median follow-up of 43 days (interquartile range-IQR: 32-54), high-on treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) occurred in 25 patients (42.4%), who displayed a greater body mass index (BMI) (p=0.02), lower levels of vitamin D (p=0.05) and were more frequently treated with nitrates (p=0.03). After multivariate analysis, BMI was the only independent predictor of prasugrel HRPR, and a BMI >26 was the best cut-off for predicting HRPR (adjusted Odds Ratio - OR=8.6, 95%CI: 2.2-33.9, p=0.002).
Conclusion: Among elderly patients receiving DAPT after PCI, HRPR is common with low-dose prasugrel. A greater BMI, especially for values ≥26, is the only independent predictor of HRPR with prasugrel 5 mg.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12052082] [PMID: 36902869]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac515] [PMID: 36477865]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.063] [PMID: 21070918]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2021.5244] [PMID: 35234821]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.10.039] [PMID: 24388624]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.02.064] [PMID: 27079334]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0706482] [PMID: 17982182]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03644.x] [PMID: 19818001]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr407] [PMID: 22067090]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jth.13177] [PMID: 26512550]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.101] [PMID: 24076493]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2016.08.010] [PMID: 27823681]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.023] [PMID: 23747759]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002303] [PMID: 23852610]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032180] [PMID: 29459361]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11239-010-0531-z] [PMID: 21080031]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2010.08.005] [PMID: 21186110]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vph.2015.04.014] [PMID: 25956733]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MBC.0b013e32835d546e] [PMID: 23412353]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-553X.2012.01428.x] [PMID: 22613071]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.10.005] [PMID: 30522897]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv698] [PMID: 26757786]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2014.02.008] [PMID: 24952397]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv304] [PMID: 26163482]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.07.033] [PMID: 35907504]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2014.06.026] [PMID: 25262263]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186961] [PMID: 29059255]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.17312] [PMID: 23117779]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.08.002] [PMID: 25139323]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31323-X] [PMID: 27581531]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.09.011] [PMID: 24182762]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2014.05.019] [PMID: 25022828]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09537104.2013.863857] [PMID: 24433187]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.04.015] [PMID: 25897998]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2020.01.001] [PMID: 32127336]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.294.24.3108] [PMID: 16380591]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000072771.11429.83] [PMID: 12796140]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1309/AJCPTE3K1SGAPOIZ] [PMID: 19461090]