Abstract
Background: Overactivation of receptors that respond to excitatory neurotransmitters can result in various harmful outcomes, such as the inability to properly modulate calcium levels, generation of free radicals, initiation of the mitochondrial permeability transition, and subsequent secondary damage caused by excitotoxicity. A non-proteinogenic amino acid of tea, L-theanine, is structurally related to glutamate, the major stimulatory neurotransmitter in the brain. Previous reports have emphasised its ability to bind with glutamate receptors.
Objective: An in-depth understanding of the binding compatibility between ionotropic glutamate receptors and L-theanine is a compelling necessity.
Methods: In this molecular docking study, the antagonistic effect of L-theanine and its possible therapeutic benefit in GluR5 kainate receptor inhibition has been evaluated and compared to the familiar AMPA and kainite receptor antagonists, cyanoquinoxaline (CNQX) and dinitroquinoxaline (DNQX), using Molegro Virtual Docker 7.0.0.
Results: The capacity of L-theanine to cohere with the GluR5 receptor was revealed to be higher than that of glutamate, although it could not surpass the high binding tendency of competitive antagonists CNQX and DNQX. Nonetheless, the drug-likeness score and the blood-brain barrier traversing potential of L-theanine were higher than CNQX and DNQX.
Conclusion: The study provides an inference to the advantage of L-theanine, which can be a safe and effective alternative natural therapy for rescuing neuronal death due to excitotoxicity.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/aps.2009.24] [PMID: 19343058]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1381612826666200113162641] [PMID: 31931694]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.579953] [PMID: 33192266]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00424-010-0809-1] [PMID: 20229265]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/neu.480230915] [PMID: 1361523]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2020.00090] [PMID: 32390802]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphs.2020.07.011] [PMID: 32807662]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40035-021-00278-7] [PMID: 35078537]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00469] [PMID: 26733784]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npp.2016.199] [PMID: 27629368]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10787-020-00751-1] [PMID: 32930914]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107749] [PMID: 33227325]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells10061309]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27134297] [PMID: 35807542]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JPD-223148] [PMID: 35527564]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25173926] [PMID: 32867388]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217604] [PMID: 36364431]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4373] [PMID: 21735448]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2012.01.011] [PMID: 22285321]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ptr.4868] [PMID: 23097345]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0008500]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2019.104478] [PMID: 31145971]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0021889892009944]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm051197e] [PMID: 16722650]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky380] [PMID: 29750256]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cns.12113] [PMID: 23638910]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2019.02.006] [PMID: 30867893]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2019.01.026] [PMID: 30703511]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(78)90967-8] [PMID: 679005]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/187152709789824606] [PMID: 19702565]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jnr.21637] [PMID: 18293419]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0471142301.ns0718s44]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/md20100645] [PMID: 36286468]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2023.121814] [PMID: 37236602]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/457079] [PMID: 21127706]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2005.tb01888.x] [PMID: 15981752]