Abstract
Background: Treatment-resistant bipolar depression is one of the leading problems in psychiatry with serious consequences on patients functioning, quality of life and resource utilization. Despite this, there is a lack of consensus on diagnostic criteria and treatment algorithms.
Objective: The objective of the present study is to assess the acute effectiveness and tolerability of cariprazine in the management of treatment resistant bipolar depression.
Methods: This is a four weeks retrospective multicentric observational study on patients with treatment resistant bipolar depression receiving cariprazine in augmentation to the current treatment. Cariprazine dosage changed during the follow-up period according to clinical judgment. Since data followed a non-normal distribution, non-parametric tests were used to pursue the analysis. The effectiveness of cariprazine was assessed through the mean change in Hamilton Depression rating scale (HAM-D) scores from baseline to endpoint. For missing values, a “Last Observation Carried Forward” approach was applied.
Results: Fifty-one patients were enrolled. Four patients (7.8%) discontinued cariprazine mainly due to adverse events. Mean cariprazine dose was 1.7 mg/day. The mean HAM-D score decreased significantly from baseline (T0) to week 4 (T4) at each evaluation point. Fourty-five one percent of the patients benefited of cariprazine add-on strategy: 23.5% achieved a clinical response and 21.6% were remitters. Among the completers, 70.6% experienced at least one adverse event. All side effects were mild to moderate.
Conclusion: Cariprazine seems to be an effective and well tolerated option in the management of patients with treatment resistant bipolar depression.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.59.6.530] [PMID: 12044195]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.60.3.261] [PMID: 12622659]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2006.01.032] [PMID: 16650901]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1092852919001287] [PMID: 31576791]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00467.x] [PMID: 17680925]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00324.x] [PMID: 17391355]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5618.2008.00604.x] [PMID: 18657247]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5618.2012.00991.x] [PMID: 22510035]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2018.257] [PMID: 30520709]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269881111408461] [PMID: 21940761]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.107.048504] [PMID: 19118318]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-5618.2003.00019.x] [PMID: 12680897]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4088/JCP.09r05385gre] [PMID: 21034686]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2022.110672] [PMID: 36332699]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41380-023-02045-8] [PMID: 37020049]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S100846] [PMID: 27099503]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1092852916000043] [PMID: 26956157]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00210-008-0311-x] [PMID: 18548231]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyx038] [PMID: 28531264]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.769897] [PMID: 34970166]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JCP.0000000000000064] [PMID: 24699040]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bdi.13296] [PMID: 36636839]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.03.073] [PMID: 34044256]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4088/JCP.v63n1102] [PMID: 12444808]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyz064] [PMID: 31802122]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2020-1627] [PMID: 34037084]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bdi.13036] [PMID: 33296123]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-018-0805-y] [PMID: 30357570]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-012-2906-7] [PMID: 23138433]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4088/PCC.20m02611]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2019.1580571] [PMID: 30753085]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6446(05)03491-4] [PMID: 15993811]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.03.076] [PMID: 33915374]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.098] [PMID: 31969269]