Abstract
Background: The new tetrandrine derivative is an anti-human liver cancer cell inhibitor which can be used to design and develop anti-human-liver-cancer drugs.
Objective: A quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model was established to predict the physical properties of new tetrandrine derivatives using their chemical structures.
Methods: The best descriptors were selected through CODESSA software to build a multiple linear regression model. Then, gene expression programming (GEP) was used to establish a nonlinear quantitative QSAR model with descriptors to predict the activity of a series of novel tetrandrine chemotherapy drugs. The best active compound 31 was subjected to molecular docking experiments through SYBYL software with a small fragment of the protein receptor (PDB ID:2J6M).
Results: Four descriptors were selected to build a multiple linear regression model with correlation coefficients R2, R2CV and S2 with the values of 0.8352, 0.7806 and 0.0119, respectively. The training and test sets with a correlation coefficient of 0.85 and 0.83 were obtained via an automatic problem-solving program (APS) using the four selected operators as parameters, with a mean error of 1.49 and 1.08. Compound 31 had a good docking ability with an overall score of 5.8892, a collision rate of -2.8004 and an extreme value of 0.9836.
Conclusion: The computer-constructed drug molecular model reveals the factors affecting the activity of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells, which provides directions and guidance for the development of highly effective anti-humanhepatocellular- carcinoma drugs in the future.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41571-018-0073-4] [PMID: 30061739]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2015.04.004] [PMID: 25979220]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.8315] [PMID: 27027348]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jphp.13339] [PMID: 32696989]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8190] [PMID: 29849794]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2009.01.007] [PMID: 19619927]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1875-5364(16)30062-0] [PMID: 27507203]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/or.2013.2352] [PMID: 23525490]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/or.2017.5988] [PMID: 29048631]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.370585] [PMID: 22927446]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11050611]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13046-018-0678-6] [PMID: 29334999]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2009.06.009] [PMID: 19586712]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm4004285] [PMID: 24351051]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1568026614666141130092853] [PMID: 25434357]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1570163817666200316104404] [PMID: 32178612]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.01.008] [PMID: 28109948]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0792-66]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1871520622666220822010953] [PMID: 36017845]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2007.10.003]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2014.07.035]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11517-018-1811-6] [PMID: 29546505]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCI.2017.2708618]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/15734099113099990019] [PMID: 24010932]