Abstract
Background:: Radiotherapy is a standard adjuvant therapy in patients with progressive rectal cancer, but many patients are resistant to radiotherapy, leading to poor prognosis. Our study identified microRNA-652 (miR-652) value on radiotherapy response and outcome in rectal cancer patients.
Methods: miR-652 expression was determined by qPCR in primary rectal cancer from 48 patients with and 53 patients without radiotherapy. The association of miR-652 with biological factors and the prognosis was examined. The biological function of miR-652 was identified through TCGA and GEPIA database searches. Two human colon cancer cell lines (HCT116 p53+/+ and p53-/-) were used for in vitro study. The molecular interactions of miR-652 and tumor suppressor genes were studied through a computational approach.
Results: In RT patients, miR-652 expression was significantly decreased in cancers when compared to non-radiotherapy cases (P = 0.002). High miR-652 expression in non-RT patients was with increased apoptosis marker (P = 0.036), ATM (P = 0.010), and DNp73 expression (P = 0.009). High miR-652 expression was related to worse disease-free survival of non-radiotherapy patients, independent of gender, age, tumor stage, and differentiation (P = 0.028; HR = 7.398, 95% CI 0.217-3.786). The biological functional analysis further identified the prognostic value and potential relationship of miR-652 with apoptosis in rectal cancer. miR-652 expression in cancers was negatively related to WRAP53 expression (P = 0.022). After miR-652 inhibition, the estimation of reactive oxygen species, caspase activity, and apoptosis in HCT116 p53+/+ cells was significantly increased compared with HCT116 p53-/- cells after radiation. The results of the molecular docking analysis show that the miR652-CTNNBL1 and miR652-TP53 were highly stable.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest the potential value of miR-652 expression as a marker for the prediction of radiation response and clinical outcome in rectal cancer patients.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02871] [PMID: 15372042]
[PMID: 26734642]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/2772270816666220606112727]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1568026622666220401161511] [PMID: 35366775]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.02.028]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0767-2] [PMID: 19597825]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.12.043]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-89] [PMID: 21362178]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.02.007]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2779] [PMID: 21531809]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-12-294] [PMID: 22805008]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-10-109] [PMID: 22643064]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15384047.2015.1095408] [PMID: 26528635]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ijo.15.1.53] [PMID: 10375593]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13770-022-00450-8] [PMID: 35511336]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-7188-6-26] [PMID: 22115189]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2021.729513] [PMID: 34395534]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2015.09.014] [PMID: 26410586]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8029721] [PMID: 32733559]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1568026619666181221165344] [PMID: 30582478]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032999] [PMID: 22412969]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020465] [PMID: 21694772]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12943-015-0473-3] [PMID: 26607322]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.7181] [PMID: 29344228]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.24967] [PMID: 23708520]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13092125] [PMID: 33924934]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2018.11.072] [PMID: 30472379]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0463.2006.apm_417.x] [PMID: 16948818]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0888-7543(02)00038-1] [PMID: 12659813]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5808/GI.2016.14.3.112] [PMID: 27729841]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2020.1800511] [PMID: 32752954]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdf591] [PMID: 12411481]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.01.028] [PMID: 19250907]