Abstract
Introduction: Cucurbitacins are one of the most important components of Ecballium elaterium. Among the cucurbitacins, Cucurbitacin E was the first to be isolated. This study focused on screening the anticancer and insecticidal potential of Cucurbitacin E by the in-vitro, invivo, and in-silico methods.
Methods: In the study, toxicity analysis of Cucurbitacin E was determined on HeLa, Caco 2 cancer cell lines and D. melanogaster. While the expression levels of the BAD, BCL-2, AKT-1 and H-purine genes of cancer cell lines were determined, the CG15530, BUFFY, AKT-1 and Purine genes of D. melanogaster were determined by RT-PCR. Besides, molecular docking and dynamic properties of Cucurbitacin E with human and insectoid enzymes were presented in silico.
Results: The IC50 value of Cucurbitacin E in the HeLa ovarian and Caco 2 colon cancer cell lines was determined to be 42 ug/ml and 85 ug/ml, respectively. The LC50 and LC99 doses for fruit flies were determined to be 47,693 μg/ml and 133,251 μg/ml, respectively. Gene expression analysis revealed that Cucurbitacin E showed the greatest effect on Purine and AKT-1 genes in D. melanogaster. We analyzed all genes by Western blot but did not detect significant changes in genes other than H-purine. In silico studies revealed that the Purine protein of D. melanogaster had the highest bonding energy with Cucurbitacin E as a ligand. Similarly, Cucurbitacin E showed great affinity towards H-purine (-10.2 kcal/mol). Molecular dynamics simulation studies were also performed to determine the stability of the dynamic process.
Conclusion: As a result of our in vivo, in vitro and bioinformatic analyzes, it has been seen that Cucurbitacin E is effective against the cancer types and model insects studied.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/em.2860060206] [PMID: 6423380]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.66.1699.84]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2014.976284] [PMID: 25358738]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-437X(00)00190-8] [PMID: 11377963]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2011.09.002] [PMID: 22285073]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1211/jpp.61.01.0002] [PMID: 19126291]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7301.1528] [PMID: 11420276]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15563650601158834] [PMID: 18344108]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja01536a046]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/np50057a008] [PMID: 3404148]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ptr.2650090211]
[PMID: 13946249]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2731] [PMID: 24240321]
[PMID: 22433384]
[PMID: 19499576]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2019.126981]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5488/CMP.22.33301]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2] [PMID: 34265844]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(63)80023-6] [PMID: 13990617]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky473] [PMID: 29860391]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20090] [PMID: 15264259]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct900549r] [PMID: 26617301]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prot.22711] [PMID: 20408171]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00174] [PMID: 27391578]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep42717] [PMID: 28256516]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(96)00423-1]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cc9800071] [PMID: 10746014]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm020017n] [PMID: 12036371]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00412]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.01.001] [PMID: 30665854]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10585-007-9109-3] [PMID: 17952613]