Abstract
Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for about 80% of lung cancers. Cisplatin is a broad-spectrum anti-cancer drug and is often used in combination with other drugs. Research suggests that dendrobine, a pyrrolizidine derivative alkaloid, exhibits antitumor activity in various cancers. This study explores the effect of dendrobine combined with cisplatin on NSCLC and its underlying molecular mechanism.
Methods: The effects of dendrobine combined with cisplatin on tumor progression were evaluated by xenograft model (in vivo) and clonogenic survival assay (in vitro) using H1299 cell line. Annexin V staining was used for detecting apoptotic cells. The population of T cells, B cells and other subpopulations in the peripheral blood was determined by flow cytometry.
Results: Dendrobine combined with cisplatin prolonged the survival of mice implanted with H1299 cells and reduced tumor volume compared with single drug application. However, dendrobine exhibited no effect on H1299 cells in clonal survival assays with or without cisplatin treatment and did not promote cisplatin-induced apoptosis in vitro.
Importantly, dendrobine suppressed the regulatory T cells (Treg cells) and enhanced the T helper 17 cells (Th17 cells). Treatment of dendrobine significantly reduced Foxp3, and increased the level of IL-17 in serum.
Conclusion: Dendrobine displayed a synergistic effect with cisplatin to exert anti-tumor effect in vivo, which might be achieved by modulating the balance of Treg/Th17 cells rather than regulating cell apoptosis.
Keywords: Synergistic effect, dendrobine, cisplatin, non-small cell lung cancer, H1299 cell line, Treg/Th17 cells.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660] [PMID: 33538338]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.11.019] [PMID: 29183778]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.74.6065] [PMID: 28806116]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy275]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1987.5.8.1281] [PMID: 3040920]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.03.014] [PMID: 27105947]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12734] [PMID: 28748556]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2020.5079] [PMID: 32626938]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2013.03.013] [PMID: 23548823]
[PMID: 25753874]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2015.09.007] [PMID: 26590477]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2013.08.008] [PMID: 24042064]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b00276] [PMID: 28417634]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.13524] [PMID: 33119198]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-021-11534-1] [PMID: 34463801]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2020.122017] [PMID: 32050157]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2018.06.018] [PMID: 30668397]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0837-8_1] [PMID: 24818717]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10753-015-0198-x] [PMID: 26077695]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132710] [PMID: 19132915]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2012.09.010] [PMID: 23123060]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.03.053] [PMID: 26996126]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2017.12.013]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.37175/stemedicine.v1i3.47]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.08.041] [PMID: 23159950]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mc.20453] [PMID: 18459128]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/COH.0b013e3283364846] [PMID: 20543590]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-07-409755] [PMID: 23043072]