Abstract
Background: Protein supplements have become a widespread practice amongst athletes and gym users worldwide. However, studies on the use of protein supplements among female gym users in Saudi Arabia are lacking.
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of protein supplement usage among female gym users and their attitudes towards protein supplementation in Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 502 female gym users aged ≥18 years completed a structured, self-administered online questionnaire on the usage of protein supplementation. Socio- demographic information, anthropometry, health status, exercise frequency, attitudes and knowledge regarding protein supplements were obtained.
Results: The overall prevalence rate of protein supplement use among the study respondents was 36.3%. There were significant associations between the use of protein supplements and educational level (p< 0.05), the duration of being a gym member (p< 0.05) and frequency of gym visits per week (p< 0.05). Whey protein was the predominantly used supplement (57.8%), and the reason attributed to the use of protein supplement was muscle building (53.9%). The main sources of information regarding protein supplement use included the internet (30.2%) followed by gym coaches (25.3%).
Conclusion: Our findings demonstrated that a considerable number of females exercising in gyms use protein supplements, and most rely on unreliable sources for decision-making of protein supplements use. Nutritional education and consultations regarding protein supplement use are warranted.
Keywords: Protein supplements, prevalence, attitudes, whey protein, gym users, questionnaire.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00394-007-0650-2] [PMID: 17377829]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/ijsnem.2018-0020] [PMID: 29589768]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000187332.92169.e0] [PMID: 16531906]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/ijsnem.2017-0429] [PMID: 29580114]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1550-2783-8-25] [PMID: 22206347]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/72.2.551S] [PMID: 10919959]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2010.29274] [PMID: 20668050]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0387-7] [PMID: 26442916]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.01026.x] [PMID: 19895385]
[PMID: 19296032]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00060.2005] [PMID: 15914508]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2015.12.006] [PMID: 26920240]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/NRR2006122] [PMID: 19079882]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2012.37] [PMID: 22510792]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5FO01530H] [PMID: 26797090]
[PMID: 19593480]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/ijsnem.14.4.481] [PMID: 15467105]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12970-019-0294-7] [PMID: 31272457]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12367] [PMID: 28748643]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0363546509344071] [PMID: 19812387]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9219361] [PMID: 28480079]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12970-020-00342-z] [PMID: 32093724]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/703490] [PMID: 22506105]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.09.011] [PMID: 23017466]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19390211.2017.1326430] [PMID: 28557663]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.04.020] [PMID: 27103061]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2009.06.021] [PMID: 20004078]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.112.036350] [PMID: 22434603]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jn/133.6.1978S] [PMID: 12771349]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306541] [PMID: 25021423]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2007.10719651] [PMID: 18187437]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-097608] [PMID: 28698222]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2230-8229.197175] [PMID: 28163569]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2011.12.008] [PMID: 22212388]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S136898000733406X] [PMID: 17381921]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1504267] [PMID: 26465986]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6386(96)90099-2] [PMID: 8629624]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2052-1847-6-29] [PMID: 25089201]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2004.015842] [PMID: 16118303]