Abstract
Background: The genus Thymus is one of the well-known members of the Lamiaceae, comprising about 215 species. It is a polymorphic genus in this family. Therefore, possible differences in chemical composition among polymorphs may result in differences in their biological activities.
Objective: This study was designed to specify chemical composition in order to assess antioxidant activities and to characterize active constituents of essential oil of Thymus pubescens.
Methods: Essential oil was collected by hydrodistillation and was analyzed using GC-MS and GCFID. Antioxidant activities were evaluated by ABTS radical cation scavenging and β-carotene bleaching inhibition methods. Detection and identification of antioxidant components were performed by TLC-bioautography assay using ABTS•+ reagent.
Results: GC analyses indicated the presence of 39 components, accounting for 96.64% of total constituents, with thymol (38.67%), γ-terpinene (7.46%), and p-cymene (5.54%) as the main components. The IC50 values for antioxidant activities were equal to 1.15 (1.05 – 1.25) μg/mL and 0.45 (0.33 – 0.62) μg/mL for ABTS•+ scavenging and β-carotene bleaching inhibition tests, respectively. TLC-bioautography of oil resulted in the identification of thymol as the major antioxidant compound.
Conclusion: Essential oil exhibited very potent and significant antioxidant activities correlated well with increasing dose in vitro.
Keywords: Antioxidant activity, bioautography, chemical composition, essential oil, Lamiaceae, Thymus pubescens.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203216859]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2002.9699808]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2002.9699789]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2008.04.004] [PMID: 18504076]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40995-017-0159-3]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2006.9699085]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10412905.1999.9712018]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anres.2018.02.001]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0367-326X(02)00064-3] [PMID: 12048019]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.01.020]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.08.021]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.04.025]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21114152] [PMID: 32532055]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.201900254] [PMID: 31381251]
[PMID: 24734063]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5650/jos.ess13168] [PMID: 24919477]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/1006.2016.29.4.9]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11101-014-9378-9]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10412905.1997.10554245]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ffj.1875]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.02.038]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2013.01.018] [PMID: 23357566]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.02.054] [PMID: 23265454]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00315-3] [PMID: 10381194]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02668958]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jams.2012.03.003] [PMID: 22682273]