Abstract
Background: Mature lysostaphin (~28-kDa Lss) from Staphylococcus simulans proves effective in killing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) which is endemic in hospitals worldwide. Lss is Zn2+-dependent endopeptidase, but its bacteriolytic activity could be affected by exogenously added Zn2+.
Objective: To gain greater insights into structural and functional impacts of Zn2+and Ni2+on Lss-induced bioactivity.
Methods: Lss purified via immobilized metal ion-affinity chromatography was assessed for bioactivity using turbidity reduction assays. Conformational change of metal ion-treated Lss was examined by circular dichroism and intrinsic fluorescence spectroscopy. Co-sedimentation assay was performed to study interactions between Zn2+-treated Lss and S. aureus peptidoglycans. Metal ionbinding prediction and intermolecular docking were used to locate an extraneous Zn2+-binding site.
Results: A drastic decrease in Lss bioactivity against S. aureus and MRSA was revealed only when treated with Zn2+, but not Ni2+, albeit no negative effect of diethyldithiocarbamate—Zn2+-chelator on Lss-induced bioactivity. No severe conformational change was observed for Lss incubated with exogenous Zn2+ or Ni2+. Lss pre-treated with Zn2+ efficiently bound to S. aureus cell-wall peptidoglycans, suggesting non-interfering effect of exogenous metal ions on cell-wall targeting (CWT) activity. In silico analysis revealed that exogenous Zn2+, but not Ni2+, preferably interacted with a potential extraneous Zn2+-binding site (His253, Glu318 and His323) placed near the Zn2+-coordinating Lssactive site within the catalytic (CAT) domain.
Conclusion: Our present data signify the adverse influence of exogenous Zn2+ ions on Lss-induced staphylolytic activity through the exclusive presence within the CAT domain of an extraneous inhibitory Zn2+-binding site, without affecting the CWT activity.
Keywords: Inhibitory Zn2+-binding site, peptidoglycan binding, staphylolytic activity, Zn2+-chelation, metallopeptidase, methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2200] [PMID: 19680247]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2012.08.003] [PMID: 23044073]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(94)01079-X] [PMID: 7957888]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4484-3] [PMID: 23076591]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/bj1670293] [PMID: 588262]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.47.11.3407-3414.2003] [PMID: 14576095]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1801013115] [PMID: 29760099]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw1228] [PMID: 31114804]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/abio.1994.1127] [PMID: 8203764]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00859.x] [PMID: 8890152]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/febs.12929] [PMID: 25039253]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep14833] [PMID: 26437833]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42435-z] [PMID: 30979923]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2018.06.013] [PMID: 29944958]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/abio.2000.4880] [PMID: 11112271]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404] [PMID: 17846036]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00407] [PMID: 27976886]
[PMID: 19499576]
[PMID: 5456157]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00213575] [PMID: 7805627]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560051210] [PMID: 8976556]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-1327.2001.01981.x] [PMID: 11179978]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0907444900019168] [PMID: 11223517]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qua.24506]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.179.4.1193-1202.1997] [PMID: 9023202]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2005.09.082] [PMID: 16269153]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06135-w] [PMID: 28729697]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560041001] [PMID: 8535232]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(96)01412-3] [PMID: 9009226]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi00451a012] [PMID: 2611251]