Abstract
Background: Avicennia alba Blume, is a well-known mangrove plant used in traditional medicinal practices for several human ailments.
Objective: The study aimed at the evaluation of antidiabetic, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and cytotoxic activities of A. alba ethanolic leaf (AAL) and bark (AAB) extract along with phytochemical investigation.
Methods: In vitro antidiabetic study was done by α-amylase, α-glucosidase enzyme inhibition assay; antioxidant study by DPPH, ABTS, superoxide, and metal chelating assays, antiinflammatory study by protein denaturation assay. The cytotoxicity study was done on TC1 murine cell line. Further, GC-MS analysis was carried out for AAL extracts.
Results: AAL exhibited better antidiabetic activities with IC50 values of 1.18 and 0.87 mg/ml against α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzymes respectively. The AAL exhibited better ABTS, superoxide scavenging and metal chelating potential with IC50 values of 0.095, 0.127 and 0.444 mg/ml. However, AAB showed higher DPPH scavenging potential with IC50 value of 0.163 mg/ml. The AAL also exhibited higher protein denaturation potential with IC50 value of 0.370 mg/ml. The bark extract exhibited better cytotoxic activity as compared to leaf extracts on the TC1 murine cell line. The phytochemical study revealed higher total phenol (25.64 mg GAE/g), flavonoid (205.09 mg QE/g), and tannin content (251.17 mg GAE/g) in AAL. The GC-MS analysis revealed the presence of several compounds in AAL extract.
Conclusion: The result of the present study highlights the antidiabetic, antioxidant and cytotoxic activities of mangrove plant Avicennia alba.
Keywords: Avicennia alba, antidiabetic, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, GC-MS analysis, cytotoxic.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021397624349]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1248/cpb.48.339] [PMID: 10726853]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/ojc/300242]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21553769.2016.1235619]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2222-1808(12)60192-3]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ptr.2176] [PMID: 17533638]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.11.032]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2006.01.003]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10496475.2015.1057352]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.06.040]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2013.09.006]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13880209.2016.1230139] [PMID: 27925471]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.03.107] [PMID: 17719342]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21553769.2015.1091386]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11738-013-1438-z]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1099-1565(200009/10)11:5<330::AID-PCA534>3.0.CO;2-G]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0163-7258(02)00298-X] [PMID: 12453566]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-2952(03)00240-5] [PMID: 12826270]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2157-2518.1000286]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/dujps.v17i2.39177]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.21010/ajtcamv15i2.6]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7061(98)00045-4] [PMID: 9683041]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf203814r] [PMID: 22220510]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.04.009] [PMID: 17499713]