Abstract
Introduction: Nasal carriers of Staphylococcus aureus are common and play an important role in the transmission of infections. The aim of this study is a phenotypic and molecular investigation of nasal methicillin- and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus in hospitalized patients.
Methods: 202 nasal swabs were collected from patients at Prince Hamzah Hospital, Jordan, through 2016-2017. Swabs were processed according to standard microbiological procedures to isolate Staphylococci. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using disk diffusion, E-test, microdilution and Vitek 2. Methicillin resistance was confirmed by testing for the mecA gene, while vancomycin resistance was screened by testing for the vanA and vanB genes.
Results: The mean age of participants was 50.17±18.18 years and 59.4% were females. Nasal Staphylococci was isolated in 64/202 (31.7%), S. aureus was isolated from 33 samples (16.3%), MRSA was isolated from 13 samples (6.4%) and constitutive Macrolide-lincosamidestreptogramin B (MLSB) was isolated from 12 samples (5.9%). All MRSA isolates harbored the mecA gene. All isolates were sensitive to vancomycin using E-test and the microdilution test and were negative for the vanA and vanB genes. The highest resistance rate was observed for benzylpenicillin (>90%), while the lowest resistance rate was for tobramycin (<5%) among all isolates. Nasal Staphylococci, S. aureus and MRSA colonization significantly correlate with increased number of family members and previous hospitalization (P<0.05), while nasal S. aureus significantly correlates with a history of skin infection (P=0.003).
Conclusion: Nasal colonization by mecA-mediated MRSA is common among hospitalized patients, while vanA- and vanB-mediated vancomycin resistance was not detected in any nasal isolates.
Keywords: S. aureus, methicillin, vancomycin, mecA, vanA, vanB.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cll.2010.01.005] [PMID: 20513547]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2013.02.004] [PMID: 23481095]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2010.05.003] [PMID: 20851011]
[PMID: 23567819]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.39.8.1772] [PMID: 7486917]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1676-2444.20150025]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-017-0206-0] [PMID: 28399856]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70295-4] [PMID: 16310147]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(15)30059-0] [PMID: 26747923]
[PMID: 29670993]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3855/jidc.9908]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_345_16] [PMID: 29915752]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ped.12060] [PMID: 23360395]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eimc.2016.07.015] [PMID: 27590877]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2017.04.001] [PMID: 28482183]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.06208-11] [PMID: 22337975]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.42.12.5578-5581.2004] [PMID: 15583284]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3855/jidc.8316] [PMID: 28459227]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2017.104] [PMID: 29021598]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature18634] [PMID: 27466123]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.201200112] [PMID: 23165978]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2014.12.006] [PMID: 25486009]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1824-7288-40-3]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2017.03.023] [PMID: 28342937]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-015-2606-5] [PMID: 26272252]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2017.7746] [PMID: 29039613]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2014.05.007] [PMID: 25002017]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268813000010] [PMID: 23340022]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2004.10.321] [PMID: 15650377]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0195-6701(91)90234-Y] [PMID: 1675651]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188940] [PMID: 29228010]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2012.02.001] [PMID: 22440670]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/597505] [PMID: 19419270]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/430910] [PMID: 15983910]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-328] [PMID: 21073755]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2013/6378.3223] [PMID: 24086856]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2668-8] [PMID: 28830510]