Abstract
Background: This study was aimed to evaluate the protective effects of n-butanol extract of Chrysanthemum fontanesii against oxidative stress induced by sodium Valproate (VPA) in the brain of female mice in comparison to Vitamin E (Vit E).
Methods: Mice were divided into 5 groups and treated daily for 12 days. They received VPA (300 mg/kg i.p. injection), C. fontanesii butanolic extract (100 mg/kg), and Vit E (100 mg/kg). Glutathione Peroxidase Activity (GPx), Reduced Glutathione (GSH), and lipid peroxidation end products in the brain were measured.
Results: Subacute treatment of mice with VPA resulted in a significant increase in oxidative damage. At a dose of 100 mg/kg, both C. fontanesii and Vit E significantly reduced VPA-induced oxidative stress by inhibiting lipid peroxidation, increasing brain GSH content, and restoring the activity of GPx.
Conclusion: It may be concluded that the phytoconstituents present in the n-butanol extract of aerial parts of C. fontanesii are responsible for the ameliorative effect of brain antioxidant/oxidant status affected by VPA.
Keywords: Sodium valproate, brain, neurotoxicity, oxidative stress, chrysanthemum fontanesii, vitamin E.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.11.073] [PMID: 20006675]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.21188] [PMID: 17115396]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2011.04.044] [PMID: 21543053]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.08.060] [PMID: 22960313]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2013.205] [PMID: 23788034]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jnc.13029] [PMID: 25581256]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12017-008-8052-z] [PMID: 19191039]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573407212666160815124204]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573407214666171211154922]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/249031] [PMID: 25050332]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573407213666171024121712]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-8546-8-7] [PMID: 23557275]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10600-011-9844-1]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0076-6879(84)05015-1] [PMID: 6727659]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(59)90090-6] [PMID: 13650640]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(78)90342-1] [PMID: 655387]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.10.021] [PMID: 28490965]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10298-014-0871-5]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00709-014-0670-8] [PMID: 25000991]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/157015909787602823] [PMID: 19721819]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-514-9_2]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/963520] [PMID: 24381719]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.1320570222] [PMID: 7668334]
[PMID: 15765761]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0960327117695634] [PMID: 28988495]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.21746/ijbio.2017.9.2]