Abstract
Background: A deep analytical study was performed on two different formats based on a “competitive” ELISA-type assay to develop a suitable, sensitive and cheap immune device for chloramphenicol determination that could be advantageously applied to the analysis of real matrices (pharmaceutical, food and environmental).
Methods: To this purpose peroxidase enzyme as a marker and an amperometric electrode for hydrogen peroxide, as a transducer, were used. Through the first competitive format, chloramphenicol determination was based on the competition between chloramphenicol and conjugated with biotin-avidinperoxidase chloramphenicol, both free in solution, for anti-chloramphenicol immobilized in the membrane, while the second competitive format was based on the competition between free in solution chloramphenicol and immobilized in membrane one, for anti-chloramphenicol biotin-avidin-peroxidase conjugated free in solution. Results: The immunosensor was optimized by comparing the two used different “competitive” working formats on the basis of respective Kaff values, that were found to be about 105 and 104 (mol L-1)-1. The developed immune device displayed good selectivity for Chloramphenicol and LOD (limit of detection) was of the order of 10-9 mol L-1. The immunosensor was also used to test the presence of Chloramphenicol in real matrices such as cow milk, river wastewater and pharmaceutical formulations; recovery tests, using the standard addition method, gave satisfactory results. Conclusion: The results proved the validity of this immune device based on the competition between chloramphenicol and conjugated chloramphenicol obtained using biotin-avidin-peroxidase format, by which it is possible to carry out the analysis of chloramphenicol in milk and in river waste-waters with a % RSD ≤ 5 and with recovery values between 96% and 103%.Keywords: Chloramphenicol antibiotic, immunosensor, competitive format method optimization, cow milk, river waste-water, pharmaceutical formulation, analysis.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1953.12024290]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11274-017-2216-7] [PMID: 28168624]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2016.12.090] [PMID: 28153315]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2016.1256414] [PMID: 28085501]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2011.12.047] [PMID: 22483874]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(03)00484-9] [PMID: 12779220]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(02)01566-0]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-4376-2] [PMID: 21063686]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf030485l] [PMID: 14995092]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2004.10.059]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf2006062] [PMID: 21405145]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/68.5.1037] [PMID: 3877048]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1248/cpb.38.2290] [PMID: 2279294]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf903940h] [PMID: 20192212]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00604-015-1632-3]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf060275j] [PMID: 16881668]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0956-5663(03)00268-9] [PMID: 14709384]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac960983b] [PMID: 21639240]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.12.171]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2017.08.166]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac801301p] [PMID: 18837517]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2014.03.083]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/abio.1994.1410] [PMID: 7810865]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19991120)65:4<389::AID-BIT3>3.0.CO;2-V] [PMID: 10506414]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/bj0940023C] [PMID: 14340040]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s8106727] [PMID: 27873895]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2014.08.005] [PMID: 25178531]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s90302202] [PMID: 22574009]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a135539] [PMID: 3086297]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(97)00054-0]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2010.06.012] [PMID: 20637590]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1897/07-143.1] [PMID: 17944547]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s150510255] [PMID: 25942643]