Abstract
Background: Thermoelectric (TE) materials are used to fabricate the thermoelectric generator (TEG). Thermoelectric Generator (TEG) is used to convert thermal energy into electrical energy and vice-versa. Bismuth-Telluride and Antimony Telluride (Bi/Sb)2Te3 alloys are popular in the research community due to its capability of electrical energy generation in the range of room temperature. The Phase Change Material (PCM) is a good source of thermal energy storage in thermal energy harvesting. We have reviewed patents having the information of thermal energy storage and tried to provide a better cost-effective solution in thermal energy harvesting using Phase Change Material (PCM) and material used in thermoelectric generator. Finding the most appropriate TE alloy for a particular application is a challenge in the research community.
Objective: The objective of this paper is to conduct a study and analysis of performance parameter of (Bi/Sb)-Te based TE alloy along with the effect of Phase Change Material (PCM) on energy generation.
Methods: An investigation over a wide range of temperature is performed. A Bi2Te3 based Commercial- of-the-shelf (COTS) Thermoelectric Generator (TEG) has been experimentally tested in a controlled temperature environment for the analysis of its efficiency.
Result: This is found that maximum efficiency of 2.12% is achieved at a temperature difference of 60°C.
Conclusion: This investigation will be useful for the selection of material for thermal energy harvesting techniques and helps to provide an optimized framework for the research community to decide the (Bi1-xSbx)2Te3 mixed crystal alloy for their applications.
Keywords: Thermal energy harvesting, WSN, bismuth telluride, Sb2Te3, Bi2Te3, thermoelectric generator (TEG), PCM.
Graphical Abstract
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/232438]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2014.11.002]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4948053]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/410316]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/2210327908666180417143000]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11664-011-1834-3]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sse.2008.12.011]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.02.011]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2018.2863190]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSSC.2010.2042251]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/WECON.2016.7993469]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2015.05.106]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SENSOR.2003.1215249]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/20/10/104005]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11664-011-1834-3]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/307/1/012030]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2013.2257140]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2010.2102321]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11664-011-1894-4]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2008.928405]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2009.2034686]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2918987]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4948053]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pssr.200701170]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/APEC.2010.5433546]