Abstract
Introduction: Alzheimer's disease has an impact on handwriting (AD). Numerous researchers reported that fact. Therefore, examining handwriting characteristics could be a useful way to screen for AD. The aim of the article is to present the reliability and effectiveness of the AD-HS tool.
Methods: Most of the existing studies examine either linguistic manifestations of writing or certain motor functions. However, handwriting is a complex of cognitive and motor activities. Since the influence of AD on handwriting is individual, it is important to analyze the complete set of handwriting features. The AD-HS instrument is based on this principle. Validation of the AD-HS instrument for revealing cognitive impairment in AD-diagnosed persons in comparison to the control group. The study is based on the evaluation of free handwritten texts. AD-HS includes 40 handwriting and 2 linguistic features of handwritten texts. It is based on the standard protocol for handwriting analysis. The cumulative evaluation of all features builds a quantitative AD-Indicator (ADI) as a marker of possible AD conditions. The analyzed experiment includes 53 AD-diagnosed persons and a control group of 192 handwriting specimens from the existing database.
Results: AD-HS shows a distinct difference in evaluated ADI for the participants (the mean value equals 0.49) and the control group (the mean value equals 0.28).
Conclusion: The handwriting marker of AD could be an effective supplement instrument for earlier screening. It is also useful when traditional biomarkers and neurological tests could not be applied. AD-HS can accompany therapy as an indication of its effect on a person.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app9214666]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02131.x] [PMID: 22515315]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-230438] [PMID: 37718808]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000017124] [PMID: 10325451]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/b11703]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0026739]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-9457(91)90003-G]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109880] [PMID: 31390576]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13554790008402708]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/RBME.2018.2840679] [PMID: 29993722]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/094)] [PMID: 17197498]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa174] [PMID: 32929494]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2018.05.013]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-210279] [PMID: 34057089]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1520/JFS11638J] [PMID: 6142081]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(93)90064-7] [PMID: 8107977]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1935] [PMID: 9672762]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100583] [PMID: 33294808]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(96)00102-9] [PMID: 9106281]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1993.00540010075021] [PMID: 8418805]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1992.00530350065021] [PMID: 1444882]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronb/61.4.P228] [PMID: 16855035]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2003.11.005] [PMID: 15121235]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S135561779951103X] [PMID: 9989020]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13803390600611351] [PMID: 17365253]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.30629/2658-7947-2021-26-6-16-28]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-008-0977-3] [PMID: 18810601]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3083176]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1988.00520310066019] [PMID: 3390031]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781420048773]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.01.004] [PMID: 28126631]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.01.006] [PMID: 18280503]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs10010027] [PMID: 31947728]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(93)90020-R] [PMID: 8475773]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.33994/kndise.2022.67.35]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591]