Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Pediatric Reviews

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-3963
ISSN (Online): 1875-6336

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
General Research Article

Cost and Time Reduction of Industrial Mold Design and Manufacturing by Implementing Additive Manufacturing for Premature Neonatal Prong

Author(s): Kayvan Mirnia*, Atousa Kialashaki, Mohammad Heidarzadeh, Amid Maghsoudi, Zahra Pourashouri and Abbas Abaei Kashan

Volume 20, Issue 4, 2024

Published on: 24 January, 2024

Page: [532 - 539] Pages: 8

DOI: 10.2174/0115733963253344231214070824

Price: $65

Abstract

Introduction: For a long time, molding was one of the most important methods of producing metal, ceramic, and polymer materials. The two essential factors in this method were always cost and time. Technology advancements have made it possible to design in 3D using a computer and additive manufacturing. This article covers methods for using 3D printers to save time and money in the process of creating the final product. The “Prong” molds for premature neonatal respiratory aid were designed and produced based on neonatologists' considerations.

Methods: The study was conducted on fifteen very low birth neonates at Alzahra Hospital in Tabriz University from September 2017 to September 2019. In the first section, we described dental plaster material for molding. When using this material, the printing material must be selected and the parameters, like melting temperature and printer speed, must be controlled to achieve acceptable quality for the final sample. CAD software can be used to print various objects if the final 3D design is appropriate.

Results: We used additive manufacturing technology to create a new design and successfully resolved bubble issues at a low cost through a combination of creativity and experimentation. The new mold has cavities that allow the silicon to occupy the entire space and escape any bubbles.

Conclusion: The use of 3D printers allows us to achieve the best design for the prong mold while reducing both production costs and time. The ultimate mold made of aluminum was finally produced by the CNC machine. The final product was tested at Al-Zahra Hospital in Tabriz, Iran, and the results were satisfactory, with no reports of necrosis on the babies' noses.

« Previous Next »
Graphical Abstract

[1]
Assif D, Fenton A, Zarb G, Schmitt A. Comparative accuracy of implant impression procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992; 12(2): 112-21.
[PMID: 1521993]
[2]
Faria ACL, Rodrigues RCS, Macedo AP, Mattos MGC, Ribeiro RF. Accuracy of stone casts obtained by different impression materials. Braz Oral Res 2008; 22(4): 293-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242008000400002] [PMID: 19148382]
[3]
Heshmati RH, Nagy WW, Wirth CG, Dhuru VB. Delayed linear expansion of improved dental stone. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88(1): 26-31.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.127653] [PMID: 12239476]
[4]
Ellis B, Lamb DJ. The setting characteristics of alginate impression materials. Br Dent J 1981; 151(10): 343-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4804698] [PMID: 6946800]
[5]
Inoue K, Song YX, Fujii K, Kadokawa A, Kanie T. Consistency of alginate impression materials and their evaluation. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26(3): 203-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00382.x] [PMID: 10194727]
[6]
Murata H, Kawamura M, Hamada T, Chimori H, Nikawa H. Physical properties and compatibility with dental stones of current alginate impression materials. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31(11): 1115-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01343.x] [PMID: 15525391]
[7]
Thomas DS, Gilbert SW. Costs and cost effectiveness of additive manufacturing. NIST Special Publication 2014; 1176: 12.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1176]
[8]
Ventola CL. Medical applications for 3D printing: current and projected uses. P&T 2014; 39(10): 704-11.
[PMID: 25336867]
[9]
Furlow B. Medical 3-D Printing. Radiol Technol 2017; 88(5)
[10]
Rybicki FJ. Medical 3D printing and the physician-artist. Lancet 2018; 391(10121): 651-2.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30212-5] [PMID: 29617259]
[11]
Morrison RJ. Mitigation of tracheobronchomalacia with 3D-printed personalized medical devices in pediatric patients. Sci Translat Med 2015; 285(7): 285.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3010825]
[12]
Lu L, Sharf A, Zhao H, et al. Build-to-last. ACM Trans Graph 2014; 33(4): 1-10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2601097.2601168]
[13]
Canessa E. Low--cost 3D printing for science, education and sustainable development. Low-Cost 3D Print 2013; 11
[14]
Farhadi R, Yaghobian M, Saravi BM. Clinical findings leading to the diagnosis of sepsis in neonates hospitalized in Imam Khomeini and Bu Ali hospitals, Sari, Iran: 2011-2012. Glob J Health Sci 2014; 6(4): 298-303.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v6n4p298] [PMID: 24999128]
[15]
Zhou W. Human olfactory perception and olfactory communications of social information. Rice University 2009.
[16]
Gregory GA, Kitterman JA, Phibbs RH, Tooley WH, Hamilton WK. Treatment of the idiopathic respiratory-distress syndrome with continuous positive airway pressure. N Engl J Med 1971; 284(24): 1333-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197106172842401] [PMID: 4930602]
[17]
Lundstrøm KE. Early nasal continuous positive airway pressure for preterm neonates: the need for randomized trials. Acta Paediatr 2003; 92(10): 1124-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2003.tb02470.x] [PMID: 14632324]
[18]
Subramaniam P, Henderson-Smart DJ, Davis PG. Prophylactic nasal continuous positive airways pressure for preventing morbidity and mortality in very preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 3
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001243.pub2]
[19]
Prisa Mohagheghi ea. Textbook of neonatal respiratory care. Islamic Repulic of Iran: Eide Pardazan Fan va Honar 2016.
[20]
Imbulana DI. A randomized controlled trial of a barrier dressing to reduce nasal injury in preterm infants receiving binasal noninvasive respiratory support. J Pediatr 2018; 201: 34-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.05.026]
[21]
Imbulana DI, Manley BJ, Dawson JA, Davis PG, Owen LS. Nasal injury in preterm infants receiving non-invasive respiratory support: A systematic review. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2018; 103(1): F29-35.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-313418] [PMID: 28970314]
[22]
Donovan T, Chee WW. Preliminary investigation of a disinfected gypsum die stone. Int J Prosthodont 1989; 2(3): 245-8.
[PMID: 2634410]
[23]
Neuenfeldt-Junior A. Additive and subtractive rapid prototyping techniques: A comparative analysis of FDM & CNC processes. Int J Ind Eng Manag 2021; 4: 262.

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy